Q57.
Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?
57a. Legal framework
Score
SCORE: NS/100
Rubric
Philippines score: NS/100
Score: 0/100
The country has no defence legislation that covers defence and national security purchases.
Score: 50/100
The country has legislation that covers defence and national security purchases but it may be vague or there are exemptions, e.g. covering confidential/secret items.
Score: 75/100
This indicator is not scored. Please discuss conditions in the country context related to good practice (Score 4).
Score: 100/100
The country has clear and comprehensive legislation that covers all defence and national security purchases with no exemptions.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
57b. Corruption risks
Score
SCORE: 100/100
Rubric
Philippines score: 100/100
Score: 0/100
The country has no legislation covering defence and security procurement that makes reference to corruption risks. Legislation covering defence and security procurement does not make reference to corruption risks.
Score: 25/100
The legislation superficially recognises the risks of corruption or has vague provisions on how to mitigate these risks.
Score: 50/100
The legislation superficially recognises the risks of corruption or has vague provisions on how to mitigate these risks.
Score: 100/100
The legislation recognises the risks of corruption and makes clear and comprehensive provisions to mitigate these risks.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
57c. Effectiveness
Score
SCORE: 25/100
Rubric
Philippines score: 25/100
Score: 0/100
There are regular exceptions to procurement requirements outlined in legislation and they are significant either in terms of number or scale.
Score: 50/100
Defence purchases are gennerally procured in line with legislation. There are some exceptions to the processes laid out by law, but they are minor.
Score: 100/100
The legislation on defence procurement is thoroughly implemented and followed for all defence procurement.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 57a. Legal framework | 57b. Corruption risks | 57c. Effectiveness |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | NS | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Algeria | NS | 25 / 100 | NEI |
Angola | NS | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Argentina | NS | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Armenia | NS | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Australia | NS | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Bahrain | NS | NA | NA |
Bangladesh | NS | 0 / 100 | NEI |
Belgium | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | NS | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Botswana | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Brazil | NS | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Cameroon | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Canada | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Chile | NS | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
China | NS | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Colombia | NS | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Cote d'Ivoire | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Denmark | NS | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Egypt | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Estonia | NS | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Finland | NS | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
France | NS | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Germany | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Ghana | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Greece | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Hungary | NS | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
India | NS | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Indonesia | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Iran | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Iraq | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | NS | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Italy | NS | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Japan | NS | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Jordan | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Kenya | NS | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Kosovo | NS | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kuwait | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Latvia | NS | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Lebanon | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Lithuania | NS | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Malaysia | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Mali | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Mexico | NS | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Montenegro | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Morocco | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Myanmar | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Netherlands | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
New Zealand | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Niger | NS | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Nigeria | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
North Macedonia | NS | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Norway | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Oman | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Palestine | NS | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Philippines | NS | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Poland | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Portugal | NS | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Qatar | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
Russia | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Serbia | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Singapore | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Africa | NS | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
South Korea | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Sudan | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Spain | NS | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Sudan | NS | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Sweden | NS | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Switzerland | NS | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Taiwan | NS | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Tanzania | NS | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Thailand | NS | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Tunisia | NS | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Turkey | NS | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Uganda | NS | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Ukraine | NS | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | NS | 0 / 100 | NA |
United Kingdom | NS | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
United States | NS | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Venezuela | NS | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Zimbabwe | NS | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |