Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Bangladesh Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The Bangladesh Armed Forces does not have a corruption-specific military doctrine or strategy for running its peacekeeping operations. The Overseas & Plan Directorate (OPD)…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’, as Bangladesh does not have a military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue for operations [1,2].
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There are no official or public records suggesting that Bangladesh has any known training in corruption issues for commanders [1].
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption issues are taken into account at all in forward planning for military operations.
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There are no publicly available official records suggesting that corruption issues are considered in the planning or execution of peace operations [1].
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The UN Office for Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) is mandated to provide oversight critical for increasing UN resilience against corruption risks in missions. In…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There are no official records available to suggest that Bangladesh has any formal M&E guidelines for the mission on how to monitor corruption risks.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’, as Bangladesh does not deploy any personnel for corruption monitoring.
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The assessor’s research yielded no evidence of relevant guidelines for corruption risks in contracting during peacekeeping operations [1].
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no training provided on corruption risks in procurement or on any general corruption risks during peacekeeping operations [1]. The courses offered by…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Private companies set up by retired military officials have been dominating Bangladesh’s security businesses…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence of any policies regulating PMCs in Bangladesh. It appears that…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence of any policies regulating PMCs in Bangladesh.
Explore