Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

66/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 67/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
In accordance with the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, all the laws (with a few exceptions) in Estonia pass three thorough…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Riigikogu has regularly approved and vetoed laws on security. Since 1999, it has vetoed 15 and approved 265 draft laws that had been…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There is de facto consensus amongst major Estonian parties when it comes to the overall direction of the Estonian defence policy. [1] This makes…
Explore
Q2 96/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
In accordance with the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act there are 11 permanent committees at Estonia’s Riigikogu, one being the National…
Explore
Expertise Score: 75 / 100
The National Defence Committee comprises of the members of the political fractions represented in the Estonian parliament. The members and the number of the…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
Major defence policies and decisions are revised and updated at least every four years after the new composition of the national parliament is elected.…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
In accordance with the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act [1], the standing committees – such as the National Defence Committee –…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The National Defence Committee regularly commissions Estonia’s International Centre for Defence and Security to write assessments on relevant issues and topics. [1] There have…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
Every couple of months the National Defence Committee carries out hearings with representatives of the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and…
Explore
Q3 50/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 75 / 100
In accordance with the Peacetime National Defence Act, [1] the government approves a ten-year National Defence Development Plan, after having heard the opinion of…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
The debate revolves mostly around security threats and defence spending. The security threats stemming from Russia are widely discussed both in the public as…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 25 / 100
A systematic and regular consultation process does not exist in Estonia in the defence sector. Regular Riigikogu sessions (not just on defence topics) –…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The relevant government institutions have the obligation to review relevant documents concerning defence strategy and submit their proposals to the National Defence Committee before…
Explore
Q4 58/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
According to the Public Information Act, [1] the state and local government agencies are obliged to grant citizens access to public information. However, they…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
CSOs have not seen any interference from the government when it comes to the defence sector, as pointed out by two interviewees, both from…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
Interviewed experts from the CSO sector perceive the defence and security sector in Estonia to be isolated. [1] This is also reflected in the…
Explore
Q5 100/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Estonia is not considered a significant defence exporter. For example, in 2016 Estonia exported 724 small arms and 2 light weapons, according to the…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
There is little evidence that compliance with UNCAC is examined. There has been a review of the implementation of Articles III and IV of…
Explore
Q6 50/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 50 / 100
Defence issues have historically been considered important for the Estonian public due to its geopolitical location and close proximity to Russia. The defence issues…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence regularly publishes announcements and news on their website. The Ministry of Defence may organise media briefings when a new strategy…
Explore
Q7 75/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 75 / 100
Estonia passed a general anti-corruption law. [1] In addition, there is a Civil Service Act that, in addition to the officials of state and…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. The National Security Concept [1] only emphasises that it is important to tackle corruption for Estonia’s good…
Explore
Q8 58/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence does not have a department or a position that specifically deals with corruption and integrity issues. The Ministry’s Audit and…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The internal audit unit at the Ministry of Defence directly reports to the Ministry of Defence, as stipulated by the Statutes of the Ministry…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
There have been a couple of seminars to build a better understanding of the new corruption law in 2013 for the officials at the…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Twice a year the Ministry of Defence publishes results from a public poll that…
Explore
Q10 25/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 50 / 100
There is a governmental anti-corruption action plan developed regularly for every seven years. In accordance with the State Budget Act [1] it is submitted…
Explore
Regularity Score: 0 / 100
The EISS publishes its reviews annually. [1] The reviews include risk assessments for government institutions, but not specifically for the defence sector. However, the…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. This is because there are no corruption risk assessments specifically within the defence sector, nor an anti-corruption…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 75/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
Since 2015, the Centre for Defence Investment handles all the procurement and manages property in the defence sector. Since the centre was formed, the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
All major procurements and general information about them can be found in the defence budget and the ten-year National Development Plan. [1] The budget…
Explore
External oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Riigikogu approves the basis of Estonia’s defence policy, which is the fundamental document for the course of action within the defence sector. [1]…
Explore
Q12 75/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The defence budget made up 2,11% of the GDP in 2018 [1]. Amounting to 528 million euros, it was the largest defence budget in…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
Estonia’s State Budget for the year 2019 [1] was drafted based on two laws: the Constitution Act and the State Budget Act, and results…
Explore
Q13 100/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The National Defence Committee, a standing committee of the Riigikogu, takes part in the preparation of the national budget. The committee holds consultations on…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 100 / 100
The National Defence Committee invites experts to appear before the committee. They also make amendments, but not all the members of the committee are…
Explore
Q14 67/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 75 / 100
In accordance with the State Budget Act, [1] the Ministry of Finance publishes the approved budget strategy on its website promptly following the approval.…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Most of the defence budget is available to the public, except for the expenses classified as state secrets. [1] The Procedure for Protection of…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 75 / 100
The media does not generally cover the defence budget in detail, because of lack of public interest, as pointed out by an interviewee, a…
Explore
Q15 58/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Defence income is included in the national defence budget. Besides the central government, it also includes a detailed overview of the income stemming from…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Estonia’s independent institution, the National Audit Office, regularly audits the defence sector’s financial activities. In accordance with the National Audit Office Act, [1] the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Based on interviewees with CSOs and media outlets, [1,2] there is very limited public information about sources of income in the defence sector. This…
Explore
Q16 50/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
According to the Statutes of the Ministry of Defence, [1] the Audit and Development Department in the Ministry of Defence offers an objective evaluation…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 50 / 100
The internal audit unit’s activities are scrutinised by the National Audit Office which the unit closely cooperates with. The National Audit Office annually presents…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The National Audit Office and the Ministry of Defence’s internal audit unit organise regular meetings and cooperate closely, but the Ministry of Defence’s internal…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 75 / 100
All the audit’s recommendations and the implementation of those recommendations are reviewed by the leadership of the Ministry. Either a post-audit report will be…
Explore
Q17 63/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The National Audit Office exercises economic control over the government and state authorities. The main function of the National Audit Office is to assess…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The National Audit Office is a constitutional institution. The Constitution stipulates that the National Audit Office is an independent state body that carries out…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Communication Service of the National Audit Office adheres to the underlying values of governmental communication formulated in 2002. One of the principles from…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence regularly incorporates audit recommendations. [1] The leadership of the Ministry claims to consider the recommendations by the National Audit Office.…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no law that specifically states that having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation is prohibited.…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
According to an expert’s analysis (Merili Vipper has both worked in as well as written her thesis on the field), the biggest risk to…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Until July 2018 active public servants were not allowed to conduct business activities in Estonia. [1] However, the situation is different with the Defence…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. As there have not been any cases identified, this question does not apply to Estonia’s current situation.
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored “Not Applicable” as there are no cases of defence institutions being involved in businesses related to natural resources exploitation.…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 88/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
In accordance with the Penal Code, [1] a criminal organisation is a permanent organisation consisting of at least three individuals who share the distribution…
Explore
Government response Score: 75 / 100
The Minister of Justice recently stated in front of the Riigikogu [1] that police departments and the Prosecutor’s Office have been successful in combating…
Explore
Q20 100/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
There are two police units to deal with corruption in Estonia. In accordance with the Anti-Corruption Act [1], the Estonian Internal Security Service [2,3]…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Police, the Border Guard Board as well as the Estonian Internal Security Service [1] fall under the Ministry of Interior Affairs, different from…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
A report by the Security Authorities Surveillance Select Committee, based on oversight, concludes that the Estonian Internal Security Service is doing its job with…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 88/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
Since 2017, the Security Authorities Surveillance Select Committee at the Riigikogu exercises supervision over the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service that is under the purview…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Security Authorities Surveillance Committee of the Riigikogu, whose members have access to state secret information, is required to submit an overview of the…
Explore
Q22 50/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 25 / 100
The appointment of staff at the Estonian Internal Security Service (EISS) is regulated by the Security Authorities Act [1] and Police and Border Guard…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 75 / 100
In accordance with the Security Authorities Act, [1] an official and an employee of a security authority is not allowed to work for another…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
It is difficult to evaluate the vetting procedure by the Foreign Intelligence Service as it is not public information. Based on the interviewee, a…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 67/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Estonia signed the ATT in 2013 [1] and ratified the Treaty in 2014. Urmas Paet, Estonia’s Foreign Minister at the time of the signing,…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
A report from 2015 on measures undertaken to implement the ATT concludes that Estonia’s national control system includes a risk assessment procedure. It also…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Estonia is not a major arms exporter. [1] Arms exports from Estonia are barely a subject of discussion at any level. However, at the…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Lobbying is not regulated in Estonia – there is no legislation or any other kind of normative act regarding it. [1] The responsibility is…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Estonia does not regulate lobbying of defence institutions.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Estonia does not regulate lobbying of defence institutions.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Estonia does not regulate lobbying of defence institutions.
Explore