Procurement Risk:

High

Score:

43/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 63/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. European Union Directive 2009/81/EC modified national laws on the markets of the various member…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
France does have legislation that covers Defence and security procurement with a superficial mention of corruption risks: Article 45 of Order n°2015-899 of July…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
With secrecy applying to defence and security procurements, it is hard to say whether exceptions are a few or numerous. We can however say…
Explore
Q58 75/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
Decree n°2016-361 of March 25, 2016 on defence and security procurements [1] formalises all procedures for the entire defence procurement cycle, from assessment of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
General procurement is formalised by law and disclosed to the public at all steps of the process. Additionally, Decree n°2016-361 on defence and security…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
Decree n°2016-361 of March 25, 2016 on defence and security procurements [1] details policies and procedures for each step of the implementation process of…
Explore
Q59 67/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The “Sapin 2” law of 2016 [1] created the French Anti-corruption Agency (AFA) whose purpose is “to help the competent authorities and the persons…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
With the AFA only becoming operational in 2018, its efficiency cannot be fully evaluated. Early indications have been positive and it has conducted a…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Oversight institutions publish comprehensive evidence of their activity. The AFA publishes annual reports that give an overview of its yearly activities [1] and regularly…
Explore
Q60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
The latest white paper on defence and national security was issued in 2013. [1] It is the fourth white paper published since the beginning…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
Notice of planned acquisitions is not precise and clear enough for oversight agencies and civil society to debate the necessity of the proposed purchases…
Explore
Q61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to order n°2015-899 of July 23, 2015 [1] and Decree n°2016-361 of March 25, 2016 on defence and security procurements, [2] it is…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
There is no publcily available data on the purchase of hardware items for the armed forces for reasons of national security [1]. However, some…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 38/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
Article 45 of Order n°2015-899 of July 23, 2015 on public procurement [1] states that people/companies guilty of the following crimes – sale and…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
The implementation of the new set of policies originating from Order n°2015-899 of July 23, 2015 began in 2016. In the period since, it…
Explore
Q63 75/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
Procurement requirements are derived from the Military Programming Law (LPM), that sets strategic orientation and equipment renewal and acquisition objectives for 6 years. However,…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
Scrutiny is conducted on a regular basis by the Defence Committee of the National Assembly, by the Defence and Foreign Affairs Committee of the…
Explore
Purchases Score: 75 / 100
The MOAF bases its major purchases on the clearly identified requirements defined in both the yearly Finance Law and the LPM, [1] but there…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 50/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 50 / 100
According to order n°2015-899 of July 23, 2015 [1] and Decree n°2016-361 of March 25, 2016 on defence and security procurements, [2] it is…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 50 / 100
Members of the Defence Committees of the National Assembly and the Senate, or even parliamentarians part of an information mission, can request information about…
Explore
Q65 50/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
Officials with a role in designing tender specifications, or in tender board decisions, are subject to general regulations that are designed to prevent conflict…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 75 / 100
In its investigations, the Cour des Comptes can have access, “a posteriori” and upon request to the MOAF, to an audit trail detailing individuals…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
There is no Code of Conduct for tender boards. The existing legislation, the “Sapin 2” law [1] and order Order n°2015-899 of July 23,…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Members of the Defence Committees of the National Assembly and the Senate, or even mere parliamentarians part of an information mission can request information…
Explore
Q66 69/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Article 48 of Order n°2015-899 of July 23, 2015 defines collusion as a situation where “the persons in respect of whom the buyer has…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Since 2013, regulation concerning fraud in public procurement has been enhanced. The legislator decided in 2013 (with the law on the fight against tax…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The recent ICS case shows that it is up to judges to carry out independent investigations and prosecutions through formal processes, as the Ministry…
Explore
Training Score: 25 / 100
There is evidence that procurement officials within the Ministry of the Armed Forces receive training on ethics – including prevention of bribery and corruption…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 25/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
There is training for Ministry of the Armed Forces (MOAF) staff on how to monitor, assess and report on public procurement and outsourcing, [1]…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Information on armament contracts is rarely released. An interviewee [1] explained that contracts offered by the MOAF do not need to be publicised. The…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Procurement offices do not conduct reporting and delivery obligations. Contracts awarded by the MOAF can be handled outside of the general legal framework for…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The way subcontractors are handled is opaque to the extent that it is difficult to determine whether breaches of contract are acted upon or…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Companies can complain to the administrative court. This right is codified by articles L 551-1 and L 551-2 of the Administrative Justice Code. [1]…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 75 / 100
Not a substantial number of complaints being filed in front of the administrative justice was found, despite this mechanism being free (apart from the…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
French company Verney-Carron openly spoke out in the media [1] about its dissatisfaction on how bidding for the contract for precision rifles for the…
Explore
Q69 83/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Clear legislation does exist to exclude companies and senior company officials where there is a conviction or credible evidence of corruption-related offences. According to…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 100 / 100
Once cases are in the hands of the administrative judge or the PNF, like for the ICS case, they are investigated and prosecuted through…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 75 / 100
According to the “Sapin 2” law on transparency and anti-corruption of 2016, [1] public agents, French or foreign, corrupt or corrupting, can face up…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy or law, which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
As noted in 70A, France does not appear to have an official offset policy or law, which makes it difficult to evaluate how often…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner it engages…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner it engages…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner it engages…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner it engages…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
France does not appear to have an official offset policy which makes it difficult to evaluate how often or in what manner it engages…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NEI/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The French State works with intermediaries in the procurement cycle, especially when the buyer is a foreign country outside of the EU or NATO.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
Very little information is available on whether policies and laws on the use of agents were violated, as no monitoring by the MOAF or…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Details of the financing package are not publicly available. There may be no information on whether a financing package exists at all. According to…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. France is a major arms manufacturer and seller. As a buyer, it closely assesses…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Planned acquisitions of military equipment are listed in the LPM, which aims at detailing…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Almost no acquisitions are granted as a result of domestic political pressures. For instance,…
Explore