Political Risk:

Very High

Score:

31/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 25/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 25 / 100
The Kuwaiti Parliament has the right to scrutinise all Government policies, including those of the defence and security ministers, according to the constitution’s article…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Parliament regularly reviews and debates the budget and spending of the country’s defence and security sector. It discusses it least twice a year, and…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Both the Interior Minister and the Defence Minister are members of Parliament and they have the right to vote on laws, along with the…
Explore
Q2 50/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Parliament has the Defence and Interior Affairs Committee, which has the right to scrutinise every aspect of the security sector’s performance, budget, policy and…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
Only one of the five members of the committee has experience in the defence sector (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). His name is…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 75 / 100
The committee does not legally have to review defence policy every five years, but they must, like other committees, convene to discuss defence and…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The committee meets at least twice a month, according to PIL article 46 (1). The committee as a whole and its members individually, like…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
The committe does open long-term investigations but they do not usually result in public conclusions. The PIL (1) and the Kuwaiti constitution (2) do…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
Parliament rarely demands major amendments to defence policies, and all security agencies tend to ignore parliamentary recommendations, and lawmakers do not attempt to use…
Explore
Q3 19/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
Defence and security strategies are debated by the executive branch and Parliament. The public participates in these debates through traditional media outlets and social…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 0 / 100
These discussions do not include a 5-year procurement plan as that does not seem to exist in Kuwait and parliamentary discussions of defence strategy…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 25 / 100
There are public consultations on defence and security policies but only from public actors that are very supportive of the Government or ones that…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Documents on defence and security policies are not available to the public, officials and activists said (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). Kuwait’s…
Explore
Q4 17/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no policy that requires defence or security organisations to be open or cooperative with CSOs, and all civil society organisations are “not…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 25 / 100
Article 6 of Law no. 24 of 1962 (1) for civil societies does not allow CSOs to engage in politics in general and it…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
The security agencies hold sporadic, often poorly publicised meetings with civil society organisations but they are always with the ones that receive Government funding…
Explore
Q5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Kuwait signed the UNCAC in December 2003 and ratified it in February 2007 (1), but it did not sign up to the OECD convention…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
Kuwait has taken many steps to comply with UNCAC standards, especially the ones listed in Chapter IV, according to the UN’s 2015 implementation review…
Explore
Q6 38/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 50 / 100
There are regular discussions about issues of defence between journalists, academics, lawmakers and CSOs, officials, journalists and activists said (1, 2, 3, 4, 5,…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 25 / 100
The Government occasionally issues statements about topics that are being widely discussed but they do not have much meaningful information and they usually just…
Explore
Q7 63/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 75 / 100
The ACA (1) and SAB (2) all have an openly stated policies that explicitly tackle corruption and apply to all state institutions, including the…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 50 / 100
There is an action plan, officials said (1, 2, 3 and 4). The finance departments of each defence and security institution is meant to…
Explore
Q8 17/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 25 / 100
There are no special compliance and ethics units inside the interior and defence ministries but both functions are being carried out by the finance…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
These finance departments are in the chain of command of the defence and security institutions and they can easily be shut down by the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
Staff within these finance departments are aware of corruption risks facing the institutions, but they are not encouraged to deliver a strategy to combat…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Activists, journalists, officials and academics say that despite establishing the ACA, issuing new laws…
Explore
Q10 25/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 25 / 100
Corruption risks are not clearly identified and the internal financial departments of the security agencies do not have a culture of corruption risk assessment…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable because the SAB unit was created in 2017 and at the time of the GDI research…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable because the SAB unit was created in 2017 and at the time of the GDI research…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 25/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 25 / 100
Acquisition falls under the financial policies of the defence and interior ministries, which are completely shaped by the heads of these ministries, according to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Security agencies in Kuwait do not publish or announce most of the purchases they make. They only seem to announce big Western warplane deals,…
Explore
External oversight Score: 25 / 100
Parliament has the right to assess the country’s long-term acquisition plan, its legitimacy and expected efficacy, according to PIL article 76 and 147 (1),…
Explore
Q12 38/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The defence budget is released to the public and it is available on the Finance Ministry’s website (1). However, it is highly aggregated and…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 25 / 100
The general budget for all state agencies, and not just the defence and security sector, 2018/2019 was 10 days late this year (1), but…
Explore
Q13 38/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
Parliament’s Defence and Interior Affairs Committee has the right to scrutinise any aspect of the defence budget, demand information on anything it wants and…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 0 / 100
The defence committee reviews the budget and it has the means to take these institutions to task about their spending, but they often do…
Explore
Q14 25/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 25 / 100
The approved budget is published by the Finance Ministry every year in disaggregated form but often the categories that their expenses and revenues are…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Most of the budget is disclosed to the public, CSOs and the media but it does not come with a detailed breakdown of the…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
It is extremely difficult to obtain information as a citizen through formal channels, especially since there is no freedom of information act in Kuwait,…
Explore
Q15 33/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The monthly and yearly reports (1, 2 and 3) of the Finance Ministry on the budget and spending of the security agencies do tell…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
Like all other financial transactions, these practices fall under the scrutiny of the SAB, and the finance department of these agencies, which are under…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The Kuwaiti public and media seem to have no awareness of these activities, according to activists, journalists and officials (1, 2, 3, 4, 5,…
Explore
Q16 31/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
In compliance with article 76 and 147 of the PIL, the internal auditing process is subject to parliamentary oversight, which is not particularly comforting…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 25 / 100
These departments only provide oversight bodies with summary reports, Kuwaiti auditing officials said (1,2,3). In order to get more details, auditors or lawmakers would…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Internal audit reports are conducted every month and sent to state auditors at the SAB, in compliance with article 41 of Law no. 31…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The Ministry regularly addresses minor internal or external audit findings but they do not comply with major findings. These minor changes include regrading the…
Explore
Q17 25/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
At least two auditing bodies follow the military’s spending: the SAB, and Parliament’s defence committee. The SAB’s authority stems from Law no. 30 of…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The SAB’s head and the head of Parliament set the SAB’s budget, according to article 75 of the SAB’s law. If they can’t agree,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Annual audit reports are released by the SAB, but only in summary form and they do not divulge any or much information about the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The Ministry almost never incorporates the recommendations of any auditor; auditors, a member of the royal family and activists said (1, 2, 3, 4,…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Both the constitution and the laws of the police and Defence Ministry (1, 2 and 3) lack articles that forbid these institutions from having…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of defence institutions being involved in businesses that exploit the country’s natural resources, but the defence minister, Sheikh Nasser Sabah…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of individual defence personnel being involved in businesses that exploit the country’s natural resources, officials, analysts and journalists said. (1,…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there appears to be no such activities or interests to be transparent about.
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there appears to be no such activities or interests to be subjected to scrutiny.
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 88/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence through media investigations or prosecution reports that suggest that organised crime has penetrated the security agencies in Kuwait. There is…
Explore
Government response Score: 75 / 100
The internal laws of the police and the military show that the Government is aware that organised criminal networks could penetrate its agencies (1…
Explore
Q20 25/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 50 / 100
There is no unit in the military or the police whose sole job is to fight organised crime or corruption within these institutions, both…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The military prosecution, as a department, works separately, so its officers are not likely to personally know the officers whose conduct they will be…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
Cases of corruption are investigated but they almost never result in prosecutions, and the investigation is always superficial, officials and activists said (1, 2,…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
Kuwait has only one intelligence agency, State Security, which is part of the Interior Ministry, according to the Ministry’s website (1). The Parliament does…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The state auditors do not have regular access to information and officials say their requests are often denied by the ministry and the meetings…
Explore
Q22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
There is no clear criteria for the selection of high ranking officials in the intelligence services (and in the police, military and KNG in…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
Officials and activists say that intelligence posts are often given as gifts to allies of the Emir because they come with generous benefits and…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
The candidates’ profiles are examined by the General Committee for Police Affairs, which is formed by the Minister, to evaluate, promote, demote and fire…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 0/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
Kuwait has neither signed nor ratified the Arms Trade Treaty (1).
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because Kuwait has not signed up to the Arms Trade Treaty (1).
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because Kuwait is not an arms exporter. It is still worth noting that Kuwait has a very…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The country has no legal framework to regulate lobbying, officials and activists said (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been been marked Not Applicable because Kuwait does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been been marked Not Applicable because Kuwait does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector (1) (2).
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been been marked Not Applicable because Kuwait does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector (1) (2).
Explore