Personnel Risk:

Moderate

Score:

51/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 50/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 50 / 100
There is a commitment to increase transparency and integrity measures by the LAF, demonstrated by internal measures taken place (1). However, the LAF does…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 100 / 100
Though the LAF does have strict anti-corruption training (1), it has publically expressed its commitment (2) through interviews with CSOs and statements at events…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 0 / 100
Statements by senior military personnel representing the LAF commander are not made often (1). However, a few of the public statement include LAF’s commitment…
Explore
Q35 50/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Bribery and corruption are defined as offences by the Code of Military Justice, although it does not give details on giving/offering and soliciting briberies…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
This sub-indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. Information about investigations and prosecutions in the LAF are not…
Explore
Q36 33/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 25 / 100
In September 2018, the Lebanese Parliament approved a law to protect whistleblowers; it applies to all public administration employees (1). The law was originally…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 25 / 100
The government has halfheartedly encouraged whistleblowing. In September 2018, State Security with the Ministry of State for Combating Corruption launched a hotline for individuals…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
A study done by the LCPS suggests that citizens low trust in government are associated with the high perception of corruption (1). An interviewee…
Explore
Q37 33/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 50 / 100
First and second-degree posts in the LAF are allocated on a sectarian basis (1). Although competencies are looked for when picking personnel for sensitive…
Explore
Selection process Score: 0 / 100
The sectarian element overrules competencies and is a precondition to an appointment (1). Heads of political parties are continuously involved in the nomination of…
Explore
Oversight Score: 50 / 100
The Military Council is responsible for approving the promotion and appointments of military personnel before sending them to the minister of defence (1). High…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 33/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 0 / 100
Numbers of civilian and military personnel at the Ministry of Defence and in the LAF are not accurate as they vary in different sources.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The LAF does not publish official figures on the number of civilian and military personnel (1).
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of ghost soldiers being a problem within the LAF. A source denied knowledge of any previous incidents with ghost soldiers…
Explore
Q39 100/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 100 / 100
In July 2017, the Parliament passed a salary scale law public administration workers and military personnel (1). The law is available online on the…
Explore
Allowances Score: 100 / 100
The decrees indicating the allowances and its criteria for civilian and military personnel are published online. As previously mentioned in 39A, civilians at the…
Explore
Q40 92/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
From research, only on one occasion, in 2015, was there a 45-day delay in payment for personnel (1). The government then resolved the issue.…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 100 / 100
No information was found on inaccurate pay for military personnel (1). A source dismissed that these incidents have happened (2).
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
A payment and allowances system is published online including, pay brackets for all ranks (1). The NDL outlines the calculations for military personnel’s pay…
Explore
Q41 33/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 25 / 100
A formal appointment process exists; however, it is undermined by political and sectarian considerations. Section 3 of the National Defence Law lays out basic…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The LAF’s high-level appointments are divided along confessional lines and subject to sectarian political parties decisions. For instance, the Chief of Staff post is…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The National Defence Law outlines the general criteria for the appointments of senior positions except for the sectarian component (1). The sectarian distribution requirements…
Explore
Q42 50/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 50 / 100
LAF personnel promotions are conducted through formal appraisal processes that are laid out by the National Defense Law (1). However, there is little independent…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 75 / 100
In addition to the regular promotional progression, the National Defence Law (NDL) specifies exceptional cases for awarding ranks (1). The means, for instance, include,…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Depending on the ranks and positions of the promotions, information is published (1). For example, the appointment and promotion of senior ranking officers, such…
Explore
Frequency Score: 25 / 100
Promotions, whether in routine or exceptional circumstances, are irregularly published. For example, the graduating officers from the military academy who are promoted to the…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as compulsory military service was abolished in 2007 (1) based on the provisions of Law No. 665…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because, since the abolishment of mandatory conscription in 2007, the LAF has become an all-volunteer force (1).
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as Lebanon abolished compulsory conscription in 2007 (1). In this regard, enforcing sanctions or punishments for bribery…
Explore
Q44 67/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
The Code of Military Justice identifies bribery as a criminal offence. However, the law does not elaborate on the various bribery offences serving as…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Depending on the criminal offence, the sanctions range between prosecution, dismissal, and financial penalties. For example, for theft and embezzlement, sanctions can range between…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
Sanctions due to bribery are inconsistently applied. In the event of bribery prosecutions, the indicted officer(s) are discharged from the military (1). However, according…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 50/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
The chain of command and the chains of payment are not separate. The Finance Unit under the Directorate for Financial and Administrative Affairs handles…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 50/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 75 / 100
A booklet laying out the rules and principles of the LAF is given to military personnel. However, it is largely unknown because it is…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
There is a booklet given by the LAF to all military personnel but is not available to the public (1).
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as the booklet given to military personnel is not publically available – hence its enforcement is difficult…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
As previously indicated, the booklet is not publicized. Hence, it is impossible to know if training is part of the document (1). However, according…
Explore
Q47 0/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 0 / 100
There is no Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel working at the Ministry of National Defence or its departments, including the LAF (1).…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as a Code of Conduct for civilians is not available (1).
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as a Code of Conduct for civilians is not available (1).
Explore
Training Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as a Code of Conduct for civilians is not available (1).
Explore
Q48 42/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The LAF does not have specific anti-corruption training continuously conducted for the officers (1). In March 2018, the Directorate for International Humanitarian Law and…
Explore
Regularity Score: 0 / 100
Anti-corruption training is conducted in an ad-hoc manner (1) and by external parties (2). For example, the LAF (1) and the LTA (2) conducted…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 50 / 100
Since 2013, the LAF has cooperated with Basel Fleihan institute to conduct training for its officers at the Fouad Chehab Academy for Command and…
Explore
Q49 67/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
Defence service personnel are prosecuted by a military court. According to Article 55 of the Code of Military Justice, the outcomes of the prosecutions…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Military Court prosecution outcomes are published by local media outlets. The prosecutions announcements usually include information about the indicted persons, the trial process…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Cases of corrupt activities are investigated and prosecuted. For example, in July 2018, the Military Court sentenced 14 people involved in bribes acceptance to…
Explore
Q50 67/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Facilitation of Payment is illegal in Lebanon. The LPC criminalizes forms of bribery for public officials and lays down the provisions to regulate them…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
It is not clear whether the investigated cases are regularly prosecuted because the LAF does not publish information about prosecutions (1). According to a…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 50 / 100
Facilitation payments are widespread in Lebanon due to ineffective bureaucratic procedures and lack of transparency and accountabilitiy. Bribery methods to speed up the process…
Explore