Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

23/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This sub-indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Lebanon requires a public tender for all goods and services above $535. The Public…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
The research found no specific legislation related to corruption risks in defence and security procurement. Furthermore, only those registered and listed can access military…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
No concrete evidence was found that showed defence procurement legislation was thoroughly implemented and followed for all defence procurement contracts (1). However, a source…
Explore
Q58 42/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
As indicated in Q57, Decrees no. 11573 and 11574 from 1968 are the legal decrees that formalize the LAF’s procurement policy, without foreign military’s…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is disclosed in a very abbreviated format. Only the bidders who applied for the contract are the ones who are…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
Decrees no. 11573 and 11574 from 1968 layout the procedures for each step of the implementation process of the procurement cycle (1), (2), but…
Explore
Q59 25/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Procurement oversight does exist according to Decree no. 11573. According to Article 36, the LAF’s General Directorate of Administration is responsible for the project…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
It is unclear how effective are the LAF procurement oversight mechanisms since reports related to procurement are not made available (1). According to Decree…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Procurement oversight mechanisms are entirely non-transparent because they are not publically available (1).
Explore
Q60 38/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
Lebanon created a 5-year Capabilities Development Plan (CDP), which assesses critical mission areas, capabilities, and professionalization targets linking it to budgeting and future funding…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
In general, the LAF does not purchase weapons, with the promised $3bn aid to the LAF from Saudi being earmarked for weapons purchases. Instead,…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The LAF does not purchase defence weapons in the traditional sense. There is no portion of the defence budget that is allocated to the…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Since defence purchases are not made public, this question has been marked as NA (1), (2), (3), (4), (5).
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
Decree no. 11574 dictates the general conditions and requirements for companies eligible to apply for tender with the LAF (1). Although it does not…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
Contracts and reports are not publically available (1). So, it is unclear to what extent the laws are implemented (1). However, according to sources,…
Explore
Q63 75/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
At the time of the research, Lebanon did not have a national defence strategy (1). Nevertheless, the CDPs (2013-2017 and 2018-2022) are lower-level formal…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The GDA regularly scrutinizes and oversees procurement requirements and decisions (1). The audit bodies, as mentioned from before, have praised the level of transparency…
Explore
Purchases Score: 100 / 100
The LAF systematically base all purchases on clearly identified and quantified requirements under the CDP, as mentioned in 63A (1). Most of the LAF’s…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. Awarded contracts are not published, thus it is unclear what…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
The type of competition is usually indicated at the top of the bidding announcement on the website (1). The LAF does not publish the…
Explore
Q65 38/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
Research found neither evidence of specifications and regulations for codes of conduct (that are designed to prevent conflict of interest for procurement or tender…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
The LAF has a comprehensive audit trail in selecting suppliers and designing tender specification (1). It also has an external verification process with the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Decree no. 11573 spells out the Tender Committee’s roles during the bidding process some of which are checking the legality of bidders’ documents, ensuring…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The LAF has a comprehensive audit trail in selecting suppliers and designing tender specifications (1). It also has an external verification process with the…
Explore
Q66 17/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
No specific laws were found that prohibit collusion within the defence sector, where collusion is defined as between an official and a bidder or…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Decree no. 11574 empowers procurement officials to exclude companies where there is a conviction or reasonable evidence of bribery & corruption-related offences. But the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no legislation covering defence procurement that addresses collusion (1).
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There are no specific laws in place that prohibit collusion within the defence sector, where collusion is defined as between an official and a…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 6/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
Decrees no. 11574 and 11573 outline the sanctions applied as a result of incomplete or inadequate service delivery by the tender (1), (2). However,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Contract information including details on sub-contractors, change of beneficial owners, additional costs, such as consultants and companies awarded are not publically available (1).
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Research found no evidence of regularly produced contract monitoring and completion reports, including supplier and subcontractors performance appraisals (1). However, according to Decree no…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Most contract breaches are dealt with internally since most are due to minor lack of compliance with contract requirements. It also depends on the…
Explore
Q68 NEI/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
In case of dispute, the tender has to present it to the LAF command or responsible administration within 30 days from the moment the…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. According to Decrees no. 11573 and 11574, the complaints mechanisms…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. This sub-indicator has not been scored due to a lack…
Explore
Q69 33/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Articles 55 and 60 in Decree no. 11574 (1968) is the legislation and implementation guideline empowering procurement officials to exclude companies and senior company…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 0 / 100
It is unclear if cases of corruption are investigated and prosecuted without undue influence due to the lack of information (1). However, undue political…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
It is unclear if offences result in sanctions since decisions are not publicized (1).
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
No formal policies and procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts were found (1), (2).
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of offset policies or contracts was found (1). This maybe because most of the LAF’s weapons come in the form of donations…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no formal policies and procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts (1). However, Article 29 of Decree no.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The government does not publicize the list of contracts (including details of the supplying companies) or copies of the contracts themselves (1).
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There are no published reports conducted by procurement offices on delivery obligations (1). As previously stated, the LAF does not publish any procurement related…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
No evidence for actual offset policies or contracts, additionally no information on their enforcement was found (1).
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Offsets are requirements by governments to foreign selling entities to compensate and return a portion of the money spent directly or indirectly invested (1).…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NEI/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
Article 13 of Decree no. 11574 indicates that agents or company representatives are not allowed to represent more than one bidder per bid in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. It is unclear if sanctions are applied when policies and…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 25/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
The existence of a financing package and the identity of the provider are normally made public. The majority of arms deals come in the…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The LAF acquires weapons in the form of donations from foreign countries (1). Thus,…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The LAF’s CDP justified the requirements for developing its capabilities and was presented in…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No incidents were found of domestic political pressures resulting in defence acquisitions (1). Domestic…
Explore