Political Risk:

Critical

Score:

11/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 0/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
Article 54 of the 2011 Constitution established the Moroccan High Security Council (Conseil Supérieur de Sécurité du Maroc) (1), however, little is known about…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Although parliament has no formal powers over defence policy, under Art.70 of the Moroccan Constitution, it has the authority to assess public policies to…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, becuse of the absence of parliamentary power over defence policy. None of the following statements apply: The…
Explore
Q2 0/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
Article 55 Section VIII of the August 2013 Internal Regulations of the Lower Chamber of Parliament (Chambre des Représentants) states that out of the…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
There is no Ministry of Defence in Morocco; instead there is a National Defence Administration (Administration de la Défense Nationale). Most members of the…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
The information available on the website of the Chamber of Representatives (1) only refers to activities undertaken during the current term of office (2016-2021),…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The Commission on Foreign Affairs, National Defence, Islamic Affairs and Moroccan Residents Abroad does not exercise any short-term oversight over defence policy and is…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
No evidence that the Commission on Foreign Affairs, national defence, Islamic affairs and Moroccan residents abroad conducts or commissions any long-term investigations over defence…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because, although the Commission on Foreign Affairs, National Defence, Islamic Affairs and Moroccan Residents Abroad does theoretically…
Explore
Q3 6/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 25 / 100
The defence policy or security strategy has not been debated at all in the last year, neither by the executive, the legislature, nor the…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 0 / 100
The defence policy or security strategy has not been debated at all in the last year, neither by the executive, the legislature, nor the…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of a formal consultation process on defence policy and security strategy in Morocco was found.
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Documents on the defence policy or security strategy are not released to the public at all (1)(2)(3). No documents about defence policy or security…
Explore
Q4 17/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no formal or informal policy that requires openness towards CSOs in the defence sector (1). Recent policies advocating for more openness towards…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
CSOs benefit from a range of protections against government interference, and are able to operate within the country (1). Article 12 of the 2011…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found to show that defence and security institutions have specifically worked with CSOs on issues of corruption, whether on a regular…
Explore
Q5 100/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
The UN Convention Against Corruption was signed by Morocco on 9 Dec 2003 and ratified on 9 May 2007 (1). Morocco is neither a…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
There has been formal compliance from the Moroccan side to the international treaties the country has signed and ratified. Additionally, there has been an…
Explore
Q6 0/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 0 / 100
– No evidence of a regular, active and public debate on issues of defence among academics was found (1)(2)(3)(4) – No evidence of a…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of government engagement in public discourse about defence issues was found, as reported by: – the press (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) – CSOs (10)(11)(12) –…
Explore
Q7 25/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 25 / 100
The general anti-corruption policy is vague and shows shortcomings in its implementation. No evidence shows that it applies to the defence sector, as it…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: NA / 100
Morocco does not have an anti-corruption policy that also applies to the defence sector. Therefore this sub-indicator is Not Applicable.
Explore
Q8 0/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 0 / 100
With regards to an effective anti-corruption policy for the defence sector, there was no evidence of compliance; there were no ethical units and not…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because so far, the evidence gathered shows that there are no independent, well-resourced, or effective institutions within…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable because so far, the evidence gathered shows that there are no independent, well-resourced, or effective institutions within…
Explore
Q9 NA/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of a defence-specific assessment of corruption risk that has been commissioned or taken place in the last 2-3 years was found (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
Risk assessments are not conducted, and this sub-indicator is therefore Not Applicable
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
Risk assessments are not conducted, and this sub-indicator is therefore Not Applicable
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 0/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of a publicly available defined process for acquisition planning was found in official sources such as websites of the Moroccan government or…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no transparency surrounding the acquisition planning process.
Explore
External oversight Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of a national or foreign body in charge of externally overseeing the acquisition planning process was found: The mandate of institutions responsible…
Explore
Q12 NEI/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
According to page 1538 of the 2018 Budget Law, the defence budget is divided into two categories: ‘staff’ and ‘equipment and various spendings’ (1).…
Explore
Timeliness Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. Based on the lack of information, this sub-indicator is marked…
Explore
Q13 0/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
There is no Defence committee within Parliament. However, there is a parliamentary Commission on Foreign Affairs, national defence, Islamic affairs and Moroccan residents abroad.(1)(2)However,…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: NA / 100
The defence committee has no formal powers, therefore this sub-indicator is Not Applicable.
Explore
Q14 17/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The approved 2018 Budget Law (and its draft submitted by the Ministry of Finance) is proactively published for the public in French and Arabic…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The approved 2018 Budget Law (and its draft submitted by the Ministry of Finance) is proactively published for the public in French and Arabic…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
Both individuals interviewed on this topic reported that it was impossible to obtain any detailed information on the defence budget (1)(2). This statement was…
Explore
Q15 8/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
According to the 2018 Budget Law, only one isolated article entitled ‘Various income’ (ref. 1.1.0.0.034.000) refers to income sources that come from outside central…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of institutional scrutiny (such as from bodies referring to the High Commissioner’s Office for Planning, the General Treasury, or the National Audit…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of public scrutiny of non-central government sources of funding by national and international media was found. (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). No evidence of public scrutiny…
Explore
Q16 NEI/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. No information about internal audit of defence ministry expenditure is…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. There is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure.
Explore
External scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. There is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure.
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. There is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure.
Explore
Q17 0/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
No evidence about external audit of defence ministry expenditure was found: Moroccan authorities in general do not disclose this information. Moreover, institutions in charge…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
As there is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure, this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
As there is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure, this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
As there is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure, this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 13/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There are no legal restrictions on defence institutions or individuals having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
The Moroccan armed forces have been stationed in Western Sahara since the beginning of the war in 1974 (1)This region is rich in phosphates…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence.
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
These interests are not mentioned in the 2018 Budget law (1)(2). These interests are not taken into account by auditing and accounting public bodies…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
These interests are not subject to scrutiny by auditing and accounting public bodies such as the National Audit Office and the Royal Treasury (1)(2).…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 25/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 50 / 100
Both interviewees stated the difficulty (bordering on the impossible) to investigate an organised crime among the Moroccan armed forces. Although they alluded to potential…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found in the media or prosecution reports to suggest that the government is alert and prepared to address organised crime within…
Explore
Q20 25/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 25 / 100
Interviewees referred to the ‘fifth office’ (5e bureau), an internal body within the military tasked with preventing  ‘influence of foreign forces’ on the Moroccan…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
Interviewees noted that, in some cases, individual involvement in trafficking conducted by military personnel was overlooked by the military and civil authorities because of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Interviewees noted that in some cases, individual involvement in trafficking conducted by military personnel was overlooked by the military and civil authorities because of…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found, either from government sources or non-government sources such as interviews, media and CSOs reports, of effective and independent oversight of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
As there is no independent oversight of the intelligence service’s policies, administration and budgets, this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Q22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
The lack of transparency and clear selection criteria for senior positions within the intelligence service suggests that these positions have so far been filled…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
The heads of the different intelligence services are appointed directly and personally by the King without any public justification. The current Head of the…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
The heads of the different intelligence services are appointed directly and personally by the King without any public justification. The current Head of the…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 0/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
As of September 2018, Morocco had not yet signed the Arms Trade Treaty (2013), or the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls and Conventional Arms…
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is scored Not Applicable as Morocco has not signed up to the ATT. (1)
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is scored Not Applicable as Morocco is not an ams exporter according to SIPRI data for 2015-2018.
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Law n° 06-99 on the freedom of pricing and concurrence dating from June 2000 outlines for the creation of a Concurrence Council (1). A…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
As the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector, this sub-indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
As the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector, this sub-indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
As the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector, this sub-indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore