Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

10/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Oman has no legislation within the country that covers defence and national security purchases.…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
Oman has no defence specific legislation that covers defence and national security procurement; therefore assessing its comprehensiveness is irrelevant in this context.
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as Oman has no legislation that covers defence and national security procurement.
Explore
Q58 0/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are general guidelines and internal policies for procurement but they are unclear, vague and lack many elements. For example, what to report as…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no documented policy, the defence procurement cycle is not disclosed to any party, including the al-Shura council, institutions, or CSOs (1), (2).…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
There are general guidelines and internal policies for procurement but they are unclear, vague and lack many elements. For example, what to report as…
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
There is a lack of independent oversight mechanisms for the defence and security sectors in general and with procurement in particular. However, there is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There is no oversight mechanism over procurement in place (see Q59A); therefore, this sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no oversight mechanism over procurement in place (see Q59A); therefore, this sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no forward planning for potential purchases and procurement with exception to normal logistical needs such as uniforms, and food supplies (1), (2).…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
As defence purchases are not subject to forward planning in Oman, there is no information available to be published. With a lack of forward…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence purchases are never released by government institutions, including the Ministry of Defence’s Directorate of Purchasing, or the Secretariat of Tender Board (1), (2).…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
There is no data available on defence purchases. The data is confidential and secret. Any release of this information could be criminalized and the…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
There are internal guidelines that put forward procedures setting out who and how suppliers and sub-contractors are selected for work contracts for the Ministry…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there are no laws or procedures outlining the standards for companies (See Q62A). As the formal…
Explore
Q63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is no national defence or security strategy which is available for the public; however, there is speculation that there may be one (1),…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As established in Q8A, there are no independent well-resourced mandated oversight bodies to scrutinize activities of the Ministry of Defence according to the BTI…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
Purchases are usually implemented outside the national defence strategy (1), (2). The purchases are either bureaucratic in nature or politically motivated (2).
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
Most of the defence purchases are implemented through single-source suppliers. This specifically refers to strategic deals such as weapons, tanks, jets, ammunition or military…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
There is no oversight mechanism (internal or external) to question single sources or open competition for purchases (1). Defence procurement is not generally done…
Explore
Q65 6/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
According to a senior financial auditor within the MoD, officials with a role in designing tenders are not subject to any regulations, but they…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
There is no oversight mechanism for personnel or officers who design and set the tenders information about defence and military procurement (1), (2).
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Although there is little to no information about the defence and military procurement, our sources confirm that there is a lack of transparency on…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no oversight mechanism for personnel or officers who design and set the tenders information about defence and military procurement (1), (2).
Explore
Q66 0/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legislation addressing collusion between bidders for defence and security contractors; general anti-corruption legislation; however, does account for public officials abuse of…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there is no legislation addressing collusion in the defence sector. Procurement personnel have no authority to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there is no legislation addressing collusion in the defence sector. According to a senior auditor within…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that training is provided to procurement officials with regards to collusion (1,2).
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 25/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 25 / 100
There are some policies and procedural measures to outlines how to monitor, assess and report supplier’s services (1). However, these guidelines do not include…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is a lack of transparency in general in the procurement process, which include reporting and delivery system. Officials fail in many cases to…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
Monitoring as part of the management of suppliers is minimal (1). Officials conduct some completion reporting on the contractual obligations but, usually, fail to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Breaches of contract can sometimes be sanctioned, but not always (1), (2).
Explore
Q68 50/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 50 / 100
It has become apparent that the complaints mechanisms for companies to complain about malpractice in procurement exists only in informal communication. According to sources,…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there are no formal complaint mechanisms. It is all based either on informal communication or contract-based articles;…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there are no formal complaint mechanisms. Companies rarely complain as they usually settle conflicts in a gentleman’s…
Explore
Q69 0/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Officials have no powers to exclude companies or individuals implicated in bribery or corrupt activities (1), (2). As the majority of these companies are…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because procurement officials have no authority to exclude companies or individuals implicated in bribery or corruption related offences.…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because procurement officials have no authority to exclude companies or individuals implicated in bribery or corruption related offences.…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 13/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
There is some relevant legislation addressing offset contracts; however, it is solely directed at foreign companies, RD 9/2014, establishes an Omani Authority for Partnership…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
The government imposes no anti-corruption due diligence or auditing requirements on offset contracts (1). Another resource confirms that corruption is not seen as a…
Explore
Q71 13/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no laws of policies that deal with the reporting process and obligations in the offset contracts (1), (2). There are no formal…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is a lack of transparency within the government managed offset contracts. There is very little data available on them. These contracts, according to…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is a form of reporting procedures that goes towards completion reports. However, these policies are not always followed, and a completion report has…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
When a contract is violated, especially in the delivery process, sanctions are highly probable against the suppliers (1), (2). There are rare cases when…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The whole polity and policies of Oman are based on non-justification in general in almost every aspect of the country. This includes the justification…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 75/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The use of intermediary agents is permitted, but there are some forms of control over them. This means that in many cases, the use…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The use of agents is permitted; however, there are conditions and restrictions based on the purchases and the contractor. According to our source, when…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The government does not publish any information about defence purchases or arms deals. The data published by the media is either via western media…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is a strong belief that defence purchases are influenced by political ties with…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is a general policy in Oman where there is no justification or deliberation…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Commonly, defence purchases and acquisitions, as well as political and strategic decisions are based…
Explore