Operational Risk:

Very High

Score:

28/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Serbia Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
There is no publicly available document which addresses corruption in operations. The military doctrine does not specifically highlight the importance of preventing corruption in…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The military doctrine does not specifically highlight the importance of preventing corruption in operations [1]. As such, this indicator is scored Not Applicable. Defence…
Explore
Q52 75/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 75 / 100
Since 2014, as a part of the regular training for all personnel before deployment to multinational operations, the Peacekeeping Operations Center organises an anti-corruption…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Participation in multinational operations planning is conducted on through the laws in the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, the Law on SAF and…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
Participation in multinational operations planning is conducted on through the laws in the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, the Law on SAF and…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 25/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Oversight and monitoring of corruption risks within the multinational operations is conducted by the responsible person in each mission, such as the contingent commander…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 50 / 100
Guidelines for monitoring corruption risks are set by an internal order from the Peacekeeping Operations Center of the SAF General Staff [1].
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Reports on corruption risks in multinational operations stay within the defence system. The reports or the activities of the personnel designated for evaluating corruption…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 38/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Guidelines for monitoring corruption risks are set by an internal order of the Peacekeeping Operations Center of the SAF General Staff [1]. There are…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The MoD organises training aimed at addressing corruption risks in procurement; however, not as a part of the preparation for deployment to multinational operations.…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Engagement of PMCs is allowed within the existing legislative framework; however, it is not…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence that PMCs are engaged in operations of the Serbian Armed…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence that PMCs are engaged in operations of the Serbian Armed…
Explore