Q8.
Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?
8a. Mandate and resources
Score
SCORE: 100/100
Rubric
South Korea score: 100/100
Score: 0/100
There are no compliance or ethics units in place and no effort to establish them.
Score: 25/100
There is no evidence of such units, but there is evidence that the country is making proactive efforts to establish them.
Score: 50/100
Compliance and ethics units in the defence sector are in place. But there are extensive weaknesses in both staffing and funding, and expertise or their mandate is unclear.
Score: 75/100
There are identifiable compliance and ethics units within defence and security that are mandated to handle integrity and corruption in defence, but there are some weaknesses either in staffing and funding, or expertise.
Score: 100/100
There are identifiable compliance and ethics units within defence and security that are mandated to handle integrity and corruption in defence, and they are suitably staffed and funded.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
8b. Independence
Score
SCORE: 75/100
Rubric
South Korea score: 75/100
Score: 0/100
The institutions/ units are under political control or they are misused. The work of the institutions can be shut down by other defence and security institutions.
Score: 50/100
The institutions/ units may be in the chain of command of the defence and security institutions that they oversee. However they can not be shut down by these institutions.
Score: 100/100
The institutions/ units are not in the chain of command of the defence and security institutions which they oversee. They report directly to a senior member of the Ministry of Defence (e.g. Chief of Staff).
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
8c. Effectiveness
Score
SCORE: 50/100
Rubric
South Korea score: 50/100
Score: 0/100
These institutions or units are not even aware of corruption risks within their institution.
Score: 25/100
Staff within the units understand the corruption risks specific to their institutions, but they fail to prepare an effective action plan with appropriate mitigation measures which address the risks.
Score: 50/100
Staff within the units understand the corruption risks specific to their institutions, but they are not able to address risks appropriately or adequately, either through their own work or by compelling others.
Score: 75/100
Staff within the units understand the corruption risks specific to their institutions, and are able to address some risks independently. But they are not able to ensure other departments address risks adequately.
Score: 100/100
Staff within the units understand the corruption risks specific to their institutions. They are able to address risks independently and to ensure that other departments or units handle risks appropriately. Actions to handle risks may include training, oversight, or policy recommendations.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 8a. Mandate and resources | 8b. Independence | 8c. Effectiveness |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Algeria | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Angola | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Argentina | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Armenia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Australia | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Bahrain | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Bangladesh | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Belgium | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Botswana | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Brazil | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Cameroon | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Canada | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Chile | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
China | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Colombia | NEI | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Cote d'Ivoire | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Denmark | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Egypt | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Estonia | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Finland | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | NEI |
France | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Germany | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Ghana | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Greece | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Hungary | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
India | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Indonesia | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Iran | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Iraq | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Italy | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Japan | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Jordan | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Kenya | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kosovo | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kuwait | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Latvia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Lebanon | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Lithuania | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Malaysia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Mali | 50 / 100 | NEI | 0 / 100 |
Mexico | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Montenegro | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Morocco | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Myanmar | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Netherlands | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
New Zealand | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | NEI |
Niger | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Nigeria | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
North Macedonia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Norway | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Oman | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Palestine | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Philippines | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Poland | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Portugal | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Qatar | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Russia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | 25 / 100 | NA | NA |
Serbia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | NEI |
Singapore | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Africa | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | NEI |
South Korea | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
South Sudan | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | NEI |
Spain | 50 / 100 | NEI | 50 / 100 |
Sudan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Sweden | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Switzerland | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Taiwan | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Tanzania | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | NEI |
Thailand | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Tunisia | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Turkey | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Uganda | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Ukraine | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
United Kingdom | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
United States | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Venezuela | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Zimbabwe | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |