Financial Risk:

Very Low

Score:

88/100

Asset Disposals

Collapse
Q24 58/100

How effective are controls over the disposal of assets, and is information on these disposals, and the proceeds of their sale, transparent?

View Question
Controls Score: 50 / 100
The policy and regulatory process for the disposal of assets is somewhat clear. In cooperation with the Defence Material Administration Agency (FMV), the Armed…
Explore
Transparency of disposal process Score: 75 / 100
Planned disposals are known in advance and are published publicly, before a buyer has been identified, in the SAF document ‘Planned materiel supply 2014…
Explore
Transparency of financial results of disposals Score: 50 / 100
The financial results of disposals are made available in the SAF annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4], but are presented in aggregate form.
Explore
Q25 83/100

Is independent and transparent scrutiny of asset disposals conducted by defence establishments, and are the reports of such scrutiny publicly available?

View Question
Scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Asset disposals are scrutinised regularly, thoroughly, and in a formalised fashion by the National Audit Office (NAO) [1].
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
As the NAO is an autonomous auditing body reporting to parliament, neither the executive nor the military are able to unduly influence scrutiny regarding…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Audit reports of the military organisation’s asset disposals, and other relevant elements of the SAF annual reports, tend to be released after 3 months…
Explore

Secret Budgets

Expand
Q26 100/100

What percentage of defence and security expenditure in the budget year is dedicated to spending on secret items relating to national security and the intelligence services?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The allocations for the National Defence Radio Establishment (FRA), the State Inspection for Defence Intelligence (SIUN), and the Defence Intelligence Court constitute 0,01995322% of…
Explore
Q27 100/100

Is the legislature (or the appropriate legislative committee or members of the legislature) given full information for the budget year on the spending of all secret items relating to national security and military intelligence?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The parliamentary Defence Committee [1], consisting of 17 MPs representing all parties in parliament, receives all the necessary information on classified spending. According to…
Explore
Q28 100/100

Are audit reports of the annual accounts of the security sector (the military and intelligence services) subject to parliamentary debate?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
According to the regulation of annual reporting and budgets [1] and the state auditing law [2] , the National Audit Office (NAO) may review…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The Defence Committee [1] convenes regularly to review and follow up on audit reports, and to highlight any potential shortcomings in auditing processes. It…
Explore
Q29 88/100

In law, are off-budget military expenditures permitted, and if so, are they exceptional occurrences that are well-controlled? In practice, are there any off-budget military expenditures? If so, does evidence suggest this involves illicit economic activity?

View Question
Permitted exceptions Score: 75 / 100
The Budget Law [1] and Appropriations Law [2], which both entered into force in 2011, regulate budget expenditure for all defence agencies [3] [4]. The laws…
Explore
Recording mechanisms Score: NA / 100
There are no off-budget miliatary expenditures in practice. Budget expenditure and financial reporting is regulated by the Budget Law [1] and Appropriations Law [2].
Explore
Prevalence Score: 100 / 100
NAO has not found any off-budget expenditures in the audit for the Swedish Armed Forces in the studied time period [1]. All defence related…
Explore
Q30 88/100

Are mechanisms for accessing information from the defence sector effective?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 75 / 100
The Public Access Law [1] and Law on Freedom of the Press [2] together stipulate how the public can access information pertaining to the…
Explore
Classification of information Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The legal framework of the Public Access Law [1] also clearly dictates the conditions…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The public is able to access information from the defence sector regularly, in detail, and within a reasonable timeline since all such official documents…
Explore
Q31 100/100

Do national defence and security institutions have beneficial ownership of commercial businesses? If so, how transparent are details of the operations and finances of such businesses?

View Question
Extent of commercial ventures Score: 100 / 100
The government – not a particular defence or security institution as such – owns a number of small to medium sized commercial businesses that…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The state’s ownership of these commercial businesses is publicly declared, with details of their operations and finances being transparent and fully disclosed [1] [2].
Explore

Military-owned Businesses

Expand
Q32 100/100

Are military-owned businesses subject to transparent independent scrutiny at a recognised international standard?

View Question
Independent scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Since November 1999, when the company Saab purchased the Swedish government’s remaining shares in the Celsius Corporate Group, there have been no state or…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Since November 1999, the Swedish state and military organisation has had no ownership of defence companies [1]. Therefore, this indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’.
Explore

Illegal Private Enterprise

Expand
Q33 63/100

Is there evidence of unauthorised private enterprise by military or other defence ministry employees? If so, what is the government’s reaction to such enterprise?

View Question
Prohibition Score: 50 / 100
The government does not explicitly outlaw private enterprises. Defined as ‘bisyssla’ (translated to ‘sideline activity’ or ‘additional job’), the law on public employment states…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 75 / 100
Unauthorised private enterprise is a problem with a few select individuals or institutions. The media has exposed corrupt behaviour in the defence minister’s closest…
Explore

Actual Military Spending

Expand
Q77 88/100

Is comprehensive data on actual spending on defence published during the budget year?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 75 / 100
Details of actual spending on defence and security are proactively published in disaggregated form in the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) annual reports [1] [2]…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The vast majority of actual defence spending is fully disclosed. There is provision for oversight of the full budget by the Swedish National Audit…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The SAF annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4], which include the details of actual spending, are published within six months of the end of the…
Explore
Comparison against budget Score: 100 / 100
Variances between the published budget and actual spend are detailed and explained in the SAF annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4].
Explore