Personnel Risk:

Low

Score:

70/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 25/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 25 / 100
No evidence could be found that the defence minister or the ministry as an institution have shown explicit commitment to anti-corruption in their internal…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 25 / 100
The government office has recently published a general statement on how it intends to ‘strengthen anti-corruption work’ by developing a national ‘action plan’ [1].…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 25 / 100
No clear statements of commitment by senior ministry of defence staff could be identified from the studied time period [1]. The armed forces have…
Explore
Q35 88/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Staff of the Swedish Armed Forces who are suspected of serious misconduct may be reported to the Armed Forces Personnel Administration (FPAN) [1]. This…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The State Disciplinary Board (SA) handles instances of bribery or corruption involving civil servants in senior positions such as directors, judges, prosecutors, and professors,…
Explore
Q36 58/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 75 / 100
In 2016, a whistleblowing law was drafted for protecting employees (regardess of employment form) from reprisals and retaliations if they report serious misconduct [1]…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 25 / 100
Beyond the the 2017 whistleblowing law, this practice is weakly encouraged in the defence sector. As noted in the 2015 iteration of the GDI…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Although formally covered by both the new Swedish law and EU regulation [1] [2], Swedish civil servants are afraid of reprisals and wary of…
Explore
Q37 0/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 0 / 100
In the selection of employees for sensitive positions in the areas of defence procurement, recruitment, contracting, financial and commercial management, there seems to be…
Explore
Selection process Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 37A, there is no recognition that certain positions may be more open to corruption opportunities than others. Therefore, this indicator is…
Explore
Oversight Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 37A, there is no recognition that certain positions may be more open to corruption opportunities than others. Therefore, this indicator is…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 83/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 50 / 100
The number of civilian and military personnel is published annually in the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) annual reports, in Annex 1 covering personnel statistics…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The numbers on civilian and military personnel that are made available in the SAF annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4] are disaggregated by rank…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
No evidence can be found that the SAF has been presented with the problem of ghost soldiers in the last five years. However, the…
Explore
Q39 38/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 50 / 100
Pay rates are published only for selected high-level civilian and military personnel in the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4].…
Explore
Allowances Score: 25 / 100
Allowances for high-ranking civil and military officers are published in the SAF annual reports [1] [2] [3] [4], but do not include criteria for…
Explore
Q40 83/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
Overall, the payment system appears routine and Swedish National Audit Office (NAO) has noted no instances of late payment during the studied time period…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
There have been occasional instances of incorrect payment. NAO has observed a ‘number of cases where salary has been paid to persons who were…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Little detailed information is made publicly available online. In the SAF annual reports [1], pay rates are published only for selected high-level civilian and…
Explore
Q41 58/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 100 / 100
The Armed Forces in Sweden (SAF) enforce an independent and standardised appointment system for the selection of military personnel, as covered by the Law…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The government handpicks candidates or all high-level civil and military positions in the SAF. As with all government agencies, the SAF’s decision to hire…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Information on the government’s appointment processes are incomplete and only partially available to the public. An appointment of SAF Supreme Commanders, for instance, is…
Explore
Q42 81/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
Promotions are regulated by a specific statute on promotions and elections which outlines formal appraisal processes [1]. Moreover, personnel cannot be promoted without passing…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 50 / 100
All forms of internal progressions and promotions are formally regulated by the SAF’s statute on promotions and elections [1]. Chapter 9 of the statute…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Information on military and civil personnel in the defence sector – including name, rank, posting, employment date – is included under the Public Access Law…
Explore
Frequency Score: 100 / 100
Details of postings and promotions are published regularly within the system and in advance of their effective date, so that they can be appealed…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 83/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
Conscription was reintroduced in 2017, and the Swedish Defence Recruitment Agency is now responsible for enrolling citizens into national military education. The agency is…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Swedish Defence Recruitment Agency’s provisions [1] and statute [2] do not acknowledge the risk of bribes for avoiding conscription, and thus do not…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The Swedish Defence Recruitment Agency’s provisions [1] and statute [2] do not acknowledge the risk of bribes for avoiding conscription, and thus do not…
Explore
Q44 83/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
As noted in Q42, there is a strict recruitment procedure within Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) which makes it difficult to gain preferred postings [1]…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Instances of bribery are handled by the State Disciplinary Board (SA) and Chancellor of Justice (JK) [1] [2] (see Q35), and in cases where…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
Appropriate sanctions or punishments in line with the Swedish Penal Code [1] are regularly applied when bribery occurs.
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The management of salaries within the ministry and armed forces are strictly separated from the chain of command. Trade unions like Officersförbundet also collaborate…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 88/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
The Swedish Armed Forces (SAF) has a webpage entitled ‘Our code of conduct’ [1] which states that the SAF disassociate themselves from ‘all forms…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The code of conduct is made available to the public on the SAF website [1]. Along with other internal anti-corruption and anti-bribery policies, it…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
Staff of the SAF who are suspected of having broken the code of conduct must be reported to their nearest commanding officer, and to…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Guidance on the code of conduct as well as related internal policies for anti-corruption and anti-bribery is included in induction training for all military…
Explore
Q47 81/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
The Swedish Defence Materiel Administration Agency (FMV) has published a brief code of conduct in the form of a statement on ‘ethics and social…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The FMV code of conduct is effectively distributed to all civilian personnel during their training, but a full-length version of the ‘internal regulations’ where…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The State Disciplinary Board (SA) handles instances of bribery or corruption involving civil servants in senior positions such as directors, judges, prosecutors, and professors,…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Guidance on the code of conduct as well as related internal policies for anti-corruption and anti-bribery is included in induction training for all civilian…
Explore
Q48 83/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Anti-corruption training in the Armed Forces (SAF) involves both civil and military staff, and addresses the connection between corruption and SAF values and standards,…
Explore
Regularity Score: 50 / 100
Anti-corruption training is delivered once at induction, and then again during promotions and upon entry into high risk positions and environments, along with security…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 100 / 100
Anti-corruption training is delivered to all staff, at each rank bracket of the military and the equivalent for civilian personnel [1].
Explore
Q49 67/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
There is no formal policy to publish or to make publicly available the outcomes of the prosecution processes involving defence institutions. However, documentation related…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The results of prosecutions are made publicly available, but usually there is little to no information included concerning the details of the hearings. However,…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
Cases are investigated or prosecuted through formal processes, and no evidence of undue political influence could be found from the studied time period [1]…
Explore
Q50 92/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Facilitation payments are criminalised accoring to Swedish law, more specifically the Public Employment Act [1] [2].
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Cases are investigated and prosecuted through formal processes in line with to the Swedish Penal Code [1]. However, it should be noted that OECD…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 100 / 100
No indications or evidence could be found that facilitation payments have been made in the defence and security sector during the studied time period…
Explore