Personnel Risk:

Moderate

Score:

55/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 50/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 25 / 100
Internal communications focusing on anti-corruption and integrity exist, but cannot be made publicly available, according to a military official interviewed. [1] Research could not…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 75 / 100
The army top officials have been showing their commitment to intergrity and anti-corruption to the public in some occasions through interviews with journalists and…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 50 / 100
This commitment is reflected throughout the defence ministry and armed forces through statements by senior ministry staff and senior armed forces officers about values…
Explore
Q35 88/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There are a range of clearly defined offences that clearly apply to the defence sector for those proved or alleged to be engaged in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Petty offences are regularly pursued across the public service, including against serving police and army. However, the military’s influence on state administration and political…
Explore
Q36 75/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 75 / 100
The Whisteblower and Witness Protection Act 2015 provides for protection of identity, and protection against retribution. There is no mention of a reversed burden…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. There is no evidence of internal whistleblowing campaigns in the defence sector being in place…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Without broad access to a cross section of defence personnel, it is not possible to…
Explore
Q37 NEI/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Not much is known about selection in the defence sector. However, in general terms, attention…
Explore
Selection process Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Again, not much is publicly known. That said, it is expected that the selection process…
Explore
Oversight Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. An interviewee indicated that oversight does exist. [1] However, in the absence of transparency it…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 8/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 25 / 100
The number of civilians in the Ministry of defense is well known as it is usually available under the Human Resource Section in the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The number of millitary personnel is kept confidential for security purposes. [1] Transparent data on the number of civilians in the defence sector is…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 0 / 100
The issue of ghost personnel has been found in different institutions after an operation led by the government. [1] However, there is no evidence…
Explore
Q39 0/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 0 / 100
Actual rates of pay for civilian or miliatary personnel are not published. The Public Service Pay and Incentives Policy is public, but is now…
Explore
Allowances Score: 0 / 100
Actual allowances for civilian or military personnel are not published. They are likely contained in Standing Order for the Public Service, but the updated…
Explore
Q40 67/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 75 / 100
There is no evidence of late payments. However, they would be unlikely to be made public by either the serving military themselves, or the…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
Personnel receive correct pay according to a senior military officer interviewed, but this could not be verified. While broad government pay scales are published,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The payment and allowances system is published internally and some information is released to general public. It includes at least all of the following:…
Explore
Q41 42/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 50 / 100
Procedures for appointments and promotions are laid out at a high level in the National Defence Act 1966, and in detail in the National…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
There is no publicly known external scrutiny for middle and top positions within the military. [1] However, a vetting process has to be conducted…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Very limited information is available about the appointment process. According to the National Defence Act 1966, the President appoints the Chief of Defence Forces,…
Explore
Q42 50/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
There are formal appraisal processes that are followed when promotions are made. When involving senior ranks, the scrutiny is performed by the independent personnel…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 50 / 100
Under Section 37 of the National Defence Act 1966, promotion is determined by the National Defence Committee established under the Defence Force Regulations. However,…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
Equivalent information on name, rank, new post and effective date of appointment for officers and civil servants is publicly declared. [1] This information is…
Explore
Frequency Score: 0 / 100
Promotions are publicised through press releases, but it is not clear if this is all promotions or only some. [1] A review of all…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’, as there is no compulsory conscription in the process of joining millitary training. Any person who is willing…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’, as there is no compulsory conscription in the process of joining millitary training. Any person who is willing…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’, as there is no compulsory conscription in the process of joining millitary training. National Service training was suspended…
Explore
Q44 100/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
Section 20 (1-2) of the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act 2007 specifically outlaws the giving, soliciting, and receiving of bribes in relation to…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Section 20 (1-2) of the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act 2007 specifies a penalty of TZS5 million or imprisonment for up to three…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The Prevention and Combating of Corruption Bureau (PCCB) claims to sanction guilty parties in the…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 NEI/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Such information would be contained, presumably, in the Defence Forces Regulations, a document which is…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 63/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
According to an interview with a member of millitary personnel, there are codes of conducts that guide millitary personnel with respect to bribery, gifts…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
According to an interview with a member of the millitary personnel, there are codes of conducts that guide millitary personnel with respect to bribery,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Breaches of the codes of conducts are regularly investigated and many public servants (defence personnel are also civil servants in Tanzania) have been taken…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
According to an interview with a member of the millitary personnel, guidance on codes of conducts is available to all millitary personnel, but, being…
Explore
Q47 75/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
The Code of Ethics for public servants does not address post separation activities. For conflicts of interest, the code advises that superiors are to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Code of ethics and conduct of Public Servants is available publicly and well distributed to civillians. It is also accessible to the general…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Breaches of the codes of conducts are regularly investigated and many public servants (defence personnel are also civil servants in Tanzania) have been taken…
Explore
Training Score: 75 / 100
All public service employees (including those in the defence sector) are subject to an induction course in which they are given guidance on the…
Explore
Q48 75/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
Anti-corruption training is regularly offered as part of the implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy and Action Plan Phase III 2017-2022. [1] While no…
Explore
Regularity Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as the regularity of anti-corruption training remains unclear. Without access to the anti-corruption workplan of…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator due to limited details on the coverage of personnel. Without access to the anti-corruption workplan…
Explore
Q49 17/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of such policy. No evidence could be found on the websites of the Ministry of Defence, or the Tanzania People’s…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Such information is rarely provided to the public. [1] [2]
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Cases are investigated and prosecuted through formal processes and normally the Public Court is used to investigate and prosecute the cases. For example, on…
Explore
Q50 67/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Facilitation payments are outlawed under the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act 2007, Section 20(1-3). [1]
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
If cases go to court, they are investigated through formal processes following normal court procedures. Cases may be investigated but are not often successfully…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 50 / 100
Cases concerning facilitation payments in the defence and security sector are very rare. This shows that facilitation payments in this area are very rare.…
Explore