Procurement Risk:

High

Score:

41/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 63/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Generally, Ukraine has a broad legal framework on public procurement. It consists of: 1.…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
Legislation on open procurement (conducted according to the Law On Public Procurement) refers to corruption as one of the potential challenges and states that…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Though there are cases of corruption in defence procurement [1, 2], there is no evidence that defence procurement generally violates legislation on defence procurement…
Explore
Q58 75/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
There are two types of military procurement: centralized (carried out by the MoD) and decentralized (carried out by military units, universities, etc.) [1]. If…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Assessment of needs, the process of awarding contracts and contract implementation for classified procurements are classified phases. Moreover, classified plans are not published, though…
Explore
Implementation Score: 75 / 100
In practice, the defence procurement cycle has few shortcomings. For example, procedures of the State Defence Order envisage the following steps: AFU Services send…
Explore
Q59 42/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 75 / 100
Internal oversight of procurement is conducted by the Internal Audit Department, an internal unit auditing the financial and material resources of the MoD and…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
With 64 bn. UAH in the MoD budget for 2017 [1], the MoD Internal Audit Department managed to audit 81 bn. UAH worth of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Ukrainian legislation does not stipulate that audit reports are to be published. However, the Internal Audit Department provides non-redacted audit reports at MPs’ request…
Explore
Q60 25/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Ukraine started implementing mid-term budget planning, and the Ministry of Finance declared it was going to introduce corresponding changes to the Law of Ukraine…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
There is a three-year procurement plan [2] for classified military procurement but MoD does not publish any information on procurement plans for classified goods…
Explore
Q61 50/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Classified military purchases are not published in any form, although public officials can provide general information on classified purchases [1], and the MoD White…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 100 / 100
Data on classified procurements is not publicly available and thus not released in an accessible format. Non-classified procurements (including those of the MoD) are…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 63/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
Classified Procurement: No provisions detail how the government discriminates suppliers based on their integrity during the selection process. Business entities can become State Defence…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 75 / 100
Classified procurement: No provisions state that the government can discriminate among suppliers based on their integrity [1, 2]. Information on the particular business entity…
Explore
Q63 58/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
Classified procurement. Planning of State Defence Order is an integral part of the development planning of the military organization of the state, carried out…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The Internal Audit Department and Department of Military Policy, Strategic Planning and International Cooperation are entitled to conduct scrutiny to confirm that procurement is…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence and the AFU base their major purchases on clearly identified requirements – State Defence Orders mostly for classified items and…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 38/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 50 / 100
With the MoD’s budget of 59.42 bn. UAH in 2016 [1], MoD public procurements (uniform, medical supply, food etc.) equalled 10.15 bn. UAH and…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
Classified procurement: Justification of classified procurements is based on state policies and requirements of the General Staff of the AFU [1]. After an annual…
Explore
Q65 56/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
Classified procurement: Procurement of goods and services which constitute state secrets are conducted without open competition, there is no tendering procedure for that [16].…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 75 / 100
Technical specifications for goods and services are developed by different units depending on the particular good or service and signed by the Minister following…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Tender board regulations [1], as well as their composition [2], are transparent. The Code of Conduct is publicly available [3].
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of external verification for particular tender specifications, although the MoD developed several technical specifications in cooperation with volunteers and private…
Explore
Q66 44/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Article 164-14 of the Code on Administrative Offences covers the responsibilities of public officials in the field of public procurement [1]. There is no…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Article 164-14 of the Code on Administrative Offences provides sanctions for infringement of legislation on procurement with administrative fines of 17000-25500 UAH (607-911 USD)…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
There is evidence that the Antimonopoly Committee investigates cases of bidders collusion in defence [1, 2, 3] and imposes fines [2]. The head of…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
It’s not been possible to find any evidence about obligatory specialized training for representatives of the MoD procurement department in order to punish collusion…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 69/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 75 / 100
According to the Law, the MoD controls the quality of military goods produced by enterprises for the Armed Forces of Ukraine and exports, as…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Classified procurement: Contracts are not available since the corresponding goods and services constitute state secrets [1]. Non-classified procurement: All contracts for non-classified procurement are…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 75 / 100
There is a procedure for officials to control contract completion [1, 2] which stipulates that special commissions should draft corresponding reports. To carry out…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
There is evidence that the MOD makes efforts to react appropriately to the cases of goods delivered being of inferior quality [1, 2, 3].…
Explore
Q68 58/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Classified procurement: The legislation does not provide any specific mechanisms for companies to complain about perceived malpractice [1, 2]. There are two clauses (Para…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 75 / 100
Classified procurement: Companies can resolve disputes in court [1, 2]; however, according to the Unified State Register for Court Decisions, a large number of…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 0 / 100
The level of trust in the Ukrainian judiciary is extremely low, with only 0.5% of citizens being fully sure in the courts’ credibility, and…
Explore
Q69 50/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Classified procurement: There is no clear legislation or implementing guidelines empowering procurement officials to exclude companies and senior company officials where there is a…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 25 / 100
There is no strong evidence in particular cases; however, in general, investigation and prosecution systems are exposed to undue influence. Corruption cases (including those…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 75 / 100
The e-procurement system Prozzoro offers information that the MoD did not discriminate among suppliers (in regards to MoD public procurement) based on their integrity…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 25/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Offset contracts are permitted and regulated by legislation. The need to regulate offset contracts is provided by the Law “On State Defence Order” [1]…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
The legislation does not provide any anti-corruption related offset requirements that should be set onto a foreign supplier [1].
Explore
Q71 31/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 75 / 100
Offset contracts are regulated by the same Law which regulates procurement of classified defence goods and services [1]. This means that goods and services…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Ukrainian legislation on offset contracts does not stipulate that offset contracts are to be published [1, 2]. The legislation also does not outline any…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
There is an offset commission set up under the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine as a permanent advisory body to coordinate…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Following the start of Russian aggression [1, 2] in Ukraine, the VRU amended the Law On State Defence Order [3] in 2015, making the…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Following the start of Russian aggression [1, 2] in Ukraine, the VRU amended the Law On State Defence Order [3] in 2015, making the…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
Classified procurement: Ukrainian legislation on State Defence Order [1, 2] does not include any ban or restriction on the use of intermediaries. Moreover, there…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
Given that there are no restrictions on the use of agents and intermediaries, this indicator is scored Not Applicable. Non-classified procurement: Ukrainian legislation on…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The financing package surrounding arms deals (including major arms deals) is not publicly available, although the State Service for Export Control of Ukraine publishes…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is not strong evidence of political influence of seller nations on Ukraine. Moreover,…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Justification for the procurement of armaments is based on state policies and requirements of…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is evidence that major arms procurements in Ukraine are strongly influenced by politicians…
Explore