Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

6/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The UAE has Federal Procurement Resolution No. 32 of 2014, amended in resolution No.…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
No evidence shows that the UAE has legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks. Defence institutions are generally exempt…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable because no evidence shows that the UAE has legislation covering defence and security procurement. Defence institutions are generally…
Explore
Q58 25/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
Some elements of the defence procurement cycle are formalized through procurement, but there is no evidence that there is legislation in practice. In the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The UAE has no public reports disclosing its procurement cycle at any stage. It considered secret and confidential data that must not be shared…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
Although some policies and procedures are formalized for the procurement cycle, it is not always followed in practice (1), (2).
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
It has been established throughout this assessment that the defence sector in the UAE is not subject to any form of oversight. Federal Resolution…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of oversight mechanisms overseeing defence procurement, an assessment of its effectiveness is…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of oversight mechanisms overseeing defence, an assessment of its transparency is irrelevant…
Explore
Q60 25/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is clear and well-established planning for defence purchases in the UAE. This can extend to up to five years…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There is no information available for the public or other sectors within the state. Plans are restricted to the Office of the Crown Prince…
Explore
Q61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
There is very little information available on the UAE’s defence purchases. The majority of information about defence purchases is available via sporadic media reports,…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data is rarely if ever, released in an accessible format by defence institutions about their actual purchases. It has been established already that no…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 25/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
There are no laws and regulations that describe the procurement mechanisms of the defence sector in relation to the selection of suppliers. It has…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicalbe, as there is no evidence to suggest that there are procedures and standards companies are required to have,…
Explore
Q63 8/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
According to sources, there is a secret defence strategy that has been developed and periodically reviewed by a specialized team from UAE and foreign…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
It has been established throughout this assessment that the defence sector in the UAE is not subject to any form of oversight. Federal Resolution…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
As has been established above, the UAE does not seem to have a national security and defence strategy, or its strategy is kept secret…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence to suggest that defence procurement is conducted as an open competition. There is no evidence on the internet of any…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
There is no open competition in defence procurement, and no oversight agencies are governing the sector in the first place (1), (2). This sub-indicator…
Explore
Q65 0/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
Since defence procurement is privately managed, tender boards as previously established do not exist publicly (1), (2). There are no rules on conflict of…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
Since defence procurement is privately managed, tender boards are not subject to oversight by government entities (1), (2).
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Defence procurement is privately managed, and there is no transparency of tender boards procedures (1), (2).
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Since defence procurement is privately managed, tender boards are not subject to oversight by government entities (1), (2).
Explore
Q66 0/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Evidence, has demonstrated that there is no specific or wider national legislation addressing defence procurement in general, and thus there is no legislation addressing…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of a legal framework discouraging and punishing collusion between bidders, assessing its…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of a legal framework discouraging and punishing collusion between bidders, assessing its…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that procurement officials are training in regards to collusion between bidders.
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Some mechanisms and procedures ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery. There is an internal auditing unit and a procurement unit…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Despite the presence of formal procedures for the management of defence suppliers, there is a lack of transparency, as the information is confidential and…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There are no monitoring mechanisms at all. Procurement offices do not conduct any reporting outside the delivery reports to ensure quantity and quality of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is little information, even for employees in the auditing units of the armed forces on whether actions are taken when contracts are breached…
Explore
Q68 0/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 0 / 100
This assessment has demonstrated that there are no oversight bodies that regulate defence procurement, and for this reason, there is not a complaint mechanism…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable as there are no complaint mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable as there are no complaint mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice…
Explore
Q69 0/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Officials have no authority to impose sanctions to punish the corrupt activities of suppliers. As major suppliers are organized by private companies, which have…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable as officials have no authority to impose sanctions to punish the corrupt activities of suppliers. There is no…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable as officials have no authority to impose sanctions to punish the corrupt activities of supplies. According to our…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that there are any laws that regulate off-set contracts. All off-set contracts (and contract budgets) go through the Emir’s office…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Although evidence suggests that some defence contracts explicitly include anti-corruption clauses, there is no evidence to suggest that the government specifically addresses corruption risks…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
This assessment has thus far demonstrated that there is no evidence or knowledge about the internal procedure and policies that outline the reporting and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as it is irrelevant within the context of the UAE to assess transparency in relation to…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as it is irrelevant to assess transparency in relation to the government’s monitoring of offset contracts,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as it is irrelevant to assess the enforcement of the government’s policies concerning the monitoring of…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no competition concerning offset contracts. The offset contracts are managed by the Office of the Crown Prince, and therefore, the suppliers are…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
This assessment has demonstrated that defence procurement in the UAE is excluded from the federal legislation, namely Resolution No. 32 of 2014, amended in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable because the UAE government does not have direct control over defence contractors, as defence procurement is…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no available information about financing packages for arms deals. Moreover, the topline figure representing the defence budget is available via media platforms,…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Research has revealed that the UAE is considered one of the top 15 military…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no public deliberation within the UAE concerning any type of policy, including…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence to suggest that domestic political pressure on defence decisions exist…
Explore