Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

5/100

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 25/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 25 / 100
No white paper on corruption has been published or otherwise made available, nor has any other kind of policy document setting out strategic issues…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’. No military doctrine or strategic document could be identified.
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Despite the fact that there are no mobilisations of military units abroad in Venezuela or participation in international missions, the government’s political strategy has…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence indicating that corruption has been taken into account in the strategic planning of internal operations deplyoments in which National Bolivarian…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence in FANB and security agencies’ strategy formulations or deployment implementations to suggest that corruption issues are taken into account. The…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Given that no specific trainings for monitoring corruption risks are listed within the framework of internal operations mobilisations, and that there is a lack…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
The Organic Law of National Security does not establish monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for FANB mobilisations. The National Defence Council, formed of representatives of…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’. Regarding operations for the maintenance of internal order, approval documents, strategic plans, and performance reports have not officially…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There are no particular guidelines for contracting within the framework of operations in which the National Bolivarian Armed Forces (FANB) are mobilised. The Organic…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any particular training on the monitoring of corruption risks when planning or during FANB operations. The training for which…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are no regulatory restrictions on the use of private military companies or contractors.…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No formal mechanisms for the scrutiny of Russian contractors’ activities are recorded in Venezuela.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Venezuela has no regulations that prohibit or regulate the hiring of private military companies;…
Explore