Political Risk:

Very Low

Score:

83/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 100/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Swiss Parliament has wide-ranging formal powers with regards to defence policy. The parliamentarians have different instruments (motions, postulates, interpellations, and questions) at their…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The Federal Assembly is not very involved in planning; however, it has full budgetary competence and plays an active role in shaping decisions, in…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The Swiss system of consociationalism (“Konkordanzdemokratie”) makes it less likely for the government to coerce Parliament, for now [1]. Due to the particularities of…
Explore
Q2 85/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Both chambers of the Federal Assembly have security committees, the Security Policy Committees (SPCs). There are 13 members on the Council of States and…
Explore
Expertise Score: 100 / 100
The Swiss Milizsystem (“milita system” i.e. parliamentarians are not full-time politicians but have a day-jobs) is probably the reason that most members of the…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 75 / 100
Although the committee has in principle the authority to review security policies and does so on a case by case basis [1], there is…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The SPC meets once a month except for one month during a summer break [1]. Article 45.1 of the Parliament Act invests the commission…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 50 / 100
The Parliament Act does not invest the Security Policy Committee (SPC) with the power to conduct long-term investigations on current activities and operations. The…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. The Security Policy Committee (SPC) has the power to submit reports, make proposals and suggest…
Explore
Q3 94/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 100 / 100
All defence planning is based in the Federal Councils’ strategy (“Rüstungsstrategie”) [1]. The first step in defence planning is the so-called MASTERPLAN developed by…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 100 / 100
When the Parliament discusses the annual “Armeebotschaft” current threats are regularly discussed. For example, during the discussions around the annual military proposals from 2018…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 75 / 100
In Switzerland, there is a formal consultation mechanism that plays an important role in the creation of legislation and ordinances in general. This is…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
All non-classified documents that are the basis of parliamentarian deliberations are easily accessible on the Curia Vista portion of the website of the Swiss…
Explore
Q4 83/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 100 / 100
The formal consultation mechanism prescribed in Swiss law is to ensure broad support for proposals and prevent them from being blocked at the end…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 100 / 100
The Swiss Constitution grants important rights and freedoms to members of the civil society. Article 23 guarantees the freedom of association and Article 17…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
No meaningful outreach to civil society from the Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport (DDPS) in connection with questions of transparency and…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Switzerland is a major arms exporter and ranked 14th most important exporter for between 2015-2018 [1]. Switzerland signed on to the UN Convention Against…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
Switzerland still has some implementation issues when it comes to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. Despite its efforts to implement the convention the Phase 4…
Explore
Q6 100/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
There is regular public debate on issues of defence. Probably not at least also due to the fact that Switzerland’s military is by and…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 100 / 100
The campaign preceding a referendum involves the government, its position is defended typically by the Federal Council in charge (i.e. defence minister) in representatives…
Explore
Q7 88/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
Switzerland is engaged on the international level in anti-corruption efforts in international organisations like OECD, the Council of Europe or the United Nations and…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 75 / 100
Until very recently there appears not to have been a comprehensive action plan for the defence sector. The Interdepartmental Working Group to Combat Corruption…
Explore
Q8 75/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
The Interdepartmental Working Group to Combat Corruption in its latest report and based on an evaluation by the Swiss Federal Audit Office (SFAO) favours…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
The Interdepartmental Working Group to Combat Corruption in its latest report and based on an evaluation by the SFAO favours the creation of a…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
A new directive from 30 January 2020 on fighting corruption the DDPS creates a specialist corruption unit. One of the tasks of that unit…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no specific polling available on the question of how the defence establishment’s…
Explore
Q10 NEI/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 50 / 100
In its first report covering the years 2011 to 2013, the Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe Korruptionsbekämpfung (IDAG Korruptionsbekämpfung) only recommended identifying specific groups at risk for…
Explore
Regularity Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. As of 30 January 2020, there is a directive for the DDPS on fighting corruption…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The November 2020 anti-corruption strategy, which applies to the Federal Administration as a whole, mentions…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 83/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
The acquisition process is subdivided into several main phases preceding procurement: planning, evaluation and parliamentary deliberation. These first phases involve the Armed Forces Staff,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The armament programme lays out the reasoning for the requested by providing background, a description of the proposed solution and why this solution was…
Explore
External oversight Score: 75 / 100
The Swiss Federal Audit Office (SFAO) audits and publishes reports on a specific aspect of the processes within the DDPS [1]. Not all the…
Explore
Q12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Every year the government submits a “Message” (“Armeebotschaft”) to Parliament containing a defence spending plan (“Rüstungsprogramm”) and a property plan (“Immobilienprogramm”) which together form…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The Armeebotschaft for the following year is usually submitted in February and then first discussed during the summer session of the Federal Assembly, leaving…
Explore
Q13 100/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Both chambers of the Federal Assembly have security committee, the Security Policy Committee (SPC). There are 13 members on the Council of States and…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 100 / 100
The SPC makes recommendations to the Federal Assembly concerning government proposals and the budget. An item will first be discussed in the committee, which…
Explore
Q14 83/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 75 / 100
The budget documents submitted to parliament containing the defence spending plan are updated after every step in the parliamentarian deliberation including the final version…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The budget documents submitted to Parliament containing the defence spending plan are updated after every step of parliamentarian deliberation, including the final version, and…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 75 / 100
In general, the budget process is relatively transparent and most information can be found on the website of the Federal Assembly, which for every…
Explore
Q15 83/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Income has to be channelled back into the general federal budget according to the law [1]. A motion in parliament in 2012 suggested to…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The law prescribes an economic and efficient use of finances (Article 12.4 FHG) [1]. There is the Swiss Federal Audit Office (SFAO) that audits…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
Although the information is available on the income of the DDPS, a search for media reports scrutinizing that income has not yielded any results.…
Explore
Q16 100/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport (DDPS) has an internal audit unit (Internal Audit DDPS). The unit reports to the general…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 100 / 100
The reports of the internal audit unit are sent to the head of the DDPS. Some of them are also published on the website…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Internal audit reports are proactively released to the DDPS and SFAO, which receives annual reports and information on focus areas, conclusions and implementation of…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The Internal Audit of the DDPS does also report on the implementation of recommendations from previous reports. These evaluations, are also published on the…
Explore
Q17 88/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
There is the Swiss Federal Audit Office (SFAO) that audits and publishes reports on a specific aspect of the processes within the Federal Department…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
Article 1.1 of the Federal Audit Act states that the SFAO is “bound only by the Federal Constitution and the law” and Article 1.2…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The SFAO has to draft a report on each audit it has completed and submit it to the finance delegation (Article 14.1). The office…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The audited institutions and departments are required by law to report to the Finance Delegation of the Federal Assembly on the implementation of the…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 83/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Switzerland does not have any natural resources to speak of. The only exceptions are not very lucrative resources like wood and water. Both are…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Switzerland does not have any natural resources to speak of and those it does possess are protected by the Swiss Constitution. On top of…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of defence institutions being involved in businesses relating to natural resource exploitation. Switzerland does not have any natural resources to…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence of Swiss defence institutions have financial or controlling interests in businesses associated with…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence of Swiss defence institutions have financial or controlling interests in businesses associated with…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 75/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There are only two potential sectors where the Swiss military’s activity might intersect directly with organized crime. One is the real estate property owned…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
Due to the mainly non-professional nature of the Swiss military, there seems to be minimal risk of involvement organized crime in the Swiss defence…
Explore
Q20 92/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 75 / 100
In the Swiss Federal system, policing is the main responsibility of the cantons. There is only a small Federal Police Force that focuses on…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
Fedpol is part of the Federal Department of Justice and Police (FDJP). It is therefore independent of the Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
In its strategy for 2015 to 2019, as well as for the strategy 2020-2023, Fedpol listed organized crime as its first priority out of…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 88/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Federal Council decides on the basic mission of the Nachrichtendienst des Bundes (NDB). The Federal Council also elects the chair of the independent…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
CDel (Article 169, Swiss Constitution) [1, 2, 3], as well as AB-ND (Article 78.4 NDG) [4], have access to all relevant documents. AB-ND is…
Explore
Q22 83/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 100 / 100
The head of the intelligence service is appointed by the Federal Council. The identity and the background of the director are known and announced…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 75 / 100
A problematic appointment at the DDPS triggered the parliamentary oversight, and in 2013 a report of the Control Committee of the National Council reviewed…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 75 / 100
The hiring procedures are supposed to include a search committee that proceeds transparently; the job needs to be publicly advertised. The 2013 report by…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 75/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Switzerland actively participated in the negotiations of the Arms Trade Treaty [1] and is among the first signatories. It signed the treaty on 3…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
Switzerland has a provision in its legislation to implement Article 7.1.b.iv, 11.5 and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty. In its initial report to…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The Federal Assembly is only involved in arms exports after the fact. It has a role in reviewing exports but no prospective power. Article…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Switzerland does not have a federal lobbying regulation or similar regulation covering lobbying footprints (such as a mandatory register, disclosure obligations or rules on…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
Switzerland does not have legislation regulating the lobbying of defence institutions; as such, this indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’. There is no evidence for…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
Switzerland does not have legislation regulating lobbying of defence institutions; as such, this indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’. However, Article 11 of ParlA requires…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
In the absence of a legal framework addressing lobbying, there is no oversight entity with an oversight mandate [1] [2]. As such, this indicator…
Explore