Political Risk:

Critical

Score:

10/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 0/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
The UAE advisory council, known as The Federal National Council (FNC) has no formal powers over defence laws or policy. According to the UAE…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The FNC does not have direct power over defence and security, because this power lies with the Supreme Council of National Security. However, at…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable. As no policies or sections in the constitution gives the FNC the power to oversee defence or security…
Explore
Q2 0/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
The FNC includes a Committee for Internal Affairs and Defence; the committee is specialised in discussing draft laws and general issues related to security…
Explore
Expertise Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no defence committee with formal powers over approving or ammending legislation. As previously explained, FNC…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no defence committee with formal powers over approving or ammending legislation. The Committee for Internal…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: NA / 100
The Committee for Internal Affairs and Defence, which is composed of FNC members, does not review major defence policies and decisions every 5 years…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no defence committee with formal powers over approving or ammending legislation. There is no evidence…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no defence committee with formal powers over approving or ammending legislation. The Committee for Internal…
Explore
Q3 0/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any public debate over the country’s national defence policy or a national security strategy debate in the UAE (1).…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as there is no evidence of the national defence policy or the national security strategy being…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as there is no evidence of the national defence policy or the national security strategy being…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
In the UAE, documents on the defence policy or security strategy are not released to the public at all. Official government websites, particularly the…
Explore
Q4 0/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There are no political or social organisations that have a political or socio-political mandate. Such organisations are not allowed to operate in the UAE…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 0 / 100
CSOs activities are limited in the UAE, and CSOs are expected to mainly focus on social, cultural, artistic, or entertainment activities. Engagement in issues…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 0 / 100
As previously explained, there is no evidence available concerning CSO’s involvement in the defence sector at all. CSOs work is restricted through laws that…
Explore
Q5 25/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 25 / 100
The UAE is a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, and the Arab Anti-Corruption…
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because the UAE has not ratified the OECD Convention, which is the relevant instrument in this case, considering…
Explore
Q6 0/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 0 / 100
There is a complete absence of any public debate on defence issues in the UAE. There is a very limited debate on socio-political issues,…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of government engagement in public discourse about defence issues. According to our sources, engagement in public discourse when it come…
Explore
Q7 50/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
In accordance with Article 2 of the Federal Law, the SAI is considered a federal committee within the FNC, responsible for detecting fraud and…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as there is not an anti-corruption policy that applies to the defence sector. The penal code…
Explore
Q8 0/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 0 / 100
On several occasions, the UAE government announced plans to establish an anti-corruption unit, within the Ministry of Defence (1), (2). In 2015, the Abu…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as there is no evidence of the existence of an anti-corruption unit in place, assessing the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as there is no evidence of the existence of an anti-corruption unit in place, assessing the…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence available to assess public trust and perceptions of the defence…
Explore
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence available that shows that any risk assessments for the defence sector have been commissioned in the last 2-3 years. The…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as NA, as no assessments of corruption risks have been commissioned in the past few years, and for this…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as NA, as no assessments of corruption risks have been commissioned in the past few years, and for this…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 0/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 0 / 100
The defence sector in the UAE does not have a defined process for acquisition planning. The Office of the Crown Prince is responsible for…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked NA because the UAE does not have a defined process for acquisition planning. There is no transparency concerning the acquisition…
Explore
External oversight Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked NA because the UAE does not have a defined process for acquisition planning. The defence sector is not subject to…
Explore
Q12 13/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
In November 2017, the UAE published the budget for 2018 through national media. The defence budget has been estimated at 6.2 billion dirhams, however,…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 0 / 100
As previously explained, the FNC is a consultative body in the country and has no power over approving the defence budget, as the defence…
Explore
Q13 0/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
There is no legislative body such as a parliament responsible for issuing, discussing and drafting laws, or reviewing any budget. It is a consultative…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable. Despite the existence of a defence committee within the FNC (the consultative body), the committee lacks…
Explore
Q14 0/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 0 / 100
There is no information available for any organization or journalists on the defence budget. According to our sources, questioning or writing about the defence…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: NA / 100
There is no defence budget publicly available, this sub-indicator is marked NA.
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
There is no possible way to obtain information about the defence sector budget in the UAE. The official government portal of the UAE and…
Explore
Q15 0/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no publication of non-central government sources of funding and income. According to our sources, the only income and source of funding comes…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As there are no non-central government sources of funds, there is not any kind of institutional scrutiny over defence income generated through non-central government…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As there are no non-central government sources of funds, there is not any kind of institutional scrutiny over defence income generated through non-central government…
Explore
Q16 8/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
There is an internal auditing unit within the defence sector. However, it conducts irregular, bureaucratic and superficial auditing and reviews of the expenditure. This…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
The UAE armed forces do not allow any oversight or internal audits of defence ministry expenditures. The majority of employees in this department are…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There are no internal reports produced by an internal body, and there is no external body that has oversight power over the armed forces…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there has not been any internal report with recommendations on the risks of corruption. Therefore, one can…
Explore
Q17 0/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
The SAI is mandated to audit all ministries including the defence and security sectors. Although the SAI is an “independent authority reporting to the…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence to support that external audits of the military and the defence sector take…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence to support that external audits of the military and the defence sector take…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence to support that external audits of the military and the defence sector take…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 10/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Research reveals that there are no restrictions on defence institutions or individuals having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 25 / 100
There is no legislation or any regulations that prohibit defence institutions from involvement in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation (1). There…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 25 / 100
Individual personnel, rather than institutions, need approval from the commander in chief to set up any kind of business in the country’s natural resources.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The interests are not declared publicly. There are no details of sources of income, operations, expenditures, or full disclosure of activities (1), (2).
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The military and defence sector do not publicly declare their financial interest in businesses associated with the country’s natural resources. The FNC (1), the…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 88/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
The UAE, according to the Global Competitiveness Report 2017/2018, has ranked the seventh globally for the absence of organised crime in general (1). According…
Explore
Government response Score: 75 / 100
The UAE is one of the top 7 countries in the world with the lowest rates for organised crime generally, thus assessing governmental response…
Explore
Q20 0/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 0 / 100
There are no policing functions to investigate organised crime within the defence sector. As previously explained, the defence sector has its jurisdiction and regulations…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
There are no police functions that oversee the defence services. Due to the absence of police functions, this sub-indicator has been marked as Not…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There are no police functions that oversee the defence services. Due to the absence of police functions, this sub-indicator has been marked as Not…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The UAE’s intelligence services consist of the UAE State Security and the Military Intelligence Security Services, both of which are not subject to any…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, due to the lack of an oversight body, and thus assessing its effectiveness in this context…
Explore
Q22 17/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
Information about the intelligence services in the UAE is scarce. However, senior and ministerial positions within these services are appointed through Emiri Decrees. In…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
Senior positions in the intelligence services are primarily appointed by the executive. Senior positions within the defence and intelligence services take place through appointments…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
According to sources, who have access to the armed forces and intelligence services, there is a process of vetting that primarily looks at two…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 25/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 50 / 100
The UAE has signed up to the ATT, but has failed to ratify it. The country signed up to the ATT on July 9,…
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored ‘Not Applicable’, as the UAE has not ratified the Arms Trade Treaty.
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The FNC does not have any power to scrutinise matters related to the defence sector or the military as it is a consultative body…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The UAE does not have a legal framework for regulating lobbying activity concerning the defence sector. It has become clear throughout this assessment, that…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as the UAE does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector (1).
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as the UAE does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector (1).
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as the UAE does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector (1).
Explore