Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Argentina Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The Argentine Armed Forces do not have a specific military doctrine that addresses the issues of corruption in operations. There are guidelines for military…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. Argentina has no military doctrine that addresses corruption as a strategic threat for operations.
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The Integrated Training Service (ITS) of the United Nations Department of Peace Operations provides a mandatory pre-deployment course in peace missions regarding standards of…
Explore
Q53 NEI/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: NEI / 100
There is Not Enough Information to score this indicator. No publicly available information could be found on the processes of military operational planning and…
Explore
Application Score: NEI / 100
There is Not Enough Information to score this indicator. No publicly available information could be found on the processes of military operational planning and…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Argentina is currently participating in 7 United Nations missions (Cyprus, Colombia, Haiti, South Sudan, Western Sahara, Middle East, and Central African Republic) with a…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
The guidelines correspond to the Operational Command of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. There is no evidence either in academia or in the press…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. There is no evidence of personnel deployed for corruption monitoring. Further, there is no public access on…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
It cannot be ascertained whether there are specific guidelines and training on corruption risks in the contracting processes for peacekeeping operations or missions for…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Regarding training, the National Contracting Office (ONC) has a training plan for the actors involved in the purchasing process, whose purpose is to provide…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. In Argentina there is no evidence that there are private military contractors, nor that…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is only state supervision over private security companies, not private military contractors, although…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Lorenc Valcarse emphasises that, together with the development of private security companies, their instances…
Explore