Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

5/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Azerbaijan Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The fight against corruption in the Military Doctrine of Azerbaijan has not been registered as a strategic issue (1). However, in the Concept of…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. The Military Doctrine of Azerbaijan does not address corruption. The country has no military doctrine that considers…
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Systematic anti-corruption training is not held in the military. According to certain information, the subject of corruption with the commanding staff is not systematically…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Corruption in military legislation in Azerbaijan is not a strategic issue. Only national security concepts contain text about anti-corruption steps. According to the experts,…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There is no official information that corruption issues are taken into account during the planning and execution of operations. The MoD does not provide…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no professional staff to monitor corruption risks within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and other military structures. The MoD has several departments,…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no Monitoring and Evaluation process for the mission on how to monitor corruption risks. There is no strategic document on the fight…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Any reports about the monitoring of the peacekeeping forces or other operational forces are not open to…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 25/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The participation of Azerbaijani servicemen in peacekeeping operations is based on The Law on the Participation of the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Peacekeeping…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
There are general corruption risks training for officers and soldiers who are deployed on foreign missions (1). There is no information available on the…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Private military companies (PMCs) and private security services are not forbidden in Azerbaijan. The…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are no laws that deal directly with PMCs in Azerbaijan. There is no…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence on enforcement that covers the data collection period for this…
Explore