Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

1.6/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 NS/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no procurement law applied to the defence sector. The civilian sector, however,…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 57A, there is no legal framework for procurement in the defence sector, and therefore this indicator has been marked ‘Not Applicable’…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 57A, there is no legal framework for procurement in the defence sector, and therefore this indicator has been marked ‘Not Applicable’…
Explore
Q58 8/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 25 / 100
There is some formalisation of the defence procurement cycle, in that some internal guidelines exist. For strategic procurement however, there is no defined mechanism.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is not disclosed and not available to the public at all. It is considered a confidential and matter of national…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
Although there are procedures for the procurement cycle that can be considered formal processes for logistics procurement, they are not implemented most of the…
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
There is no internal or external oversight mechanism over procurement. There is, however, a committee (Procurement Oversight Committee) that is activated once a year…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 59A, there is no oversight over defence procurement and, as such, this indicator has been marked ‘Not Applicable’ [1, 2].
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 59A, there is no oversight over defence procurement and, as such, this indicator has been marked ‘Not Applicable’ [1, 2].
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
According to sources, there is no white paper or strategic paper on strategic purchases. Forward planning is usually less than a year in advance…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
Based on internet research and from interviews, no information on forward planning for strategic purchases is made public. Sometimes, foreign news outlets announce the…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Based on sources, there is no publicly available data or information on the actual purchase of the defence forces. Although the external sources (such…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
According to interviewees, data on defence procurement and spending is confidential and a matter of national security. It is not publicly available, and if…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
The Civilian and General Procurement Law does not apply to the defence sector [1]. Therefore there are no laws or procedures that regulate how…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 62A, there are no policies which regulate how the government selects companies or contractors. As such, this indicator has been marked…
Explore
Q63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
No defence strategy exists, and therefore, procurement, is not derived from a defence strategy. There is no process of defining the requirements and procurement…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there is no scrutiny, internal or external over procurement [1, 2, 3]. The Supreme Defence Council does not play a…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
As there is no national defence strategy, the purchases are by default made outside a strategy [1, 2, 3].
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
There is a very small part of the procurement done through open competition: less than 5% and it is not published online. Indeed, the…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Oversight bodies, including Shura Council committees, have no power to scrutinize single-sources procurements. As most procurement (especially strategic) is signed by the king’s office,…
Explore
Q65 0/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
Personnel who are in charge of tender boards design and regulations are mostly the same for all procurements within the Ministry of Defence (MoD).…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
According to interviewees, there is no auditing or an oversight mechanism in place to ensure suppliers, design of the tender or the specification of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
As outlined in 65A and 65B, and according to our sources, tender boards are not transparent and do have a potential risk of corruption…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no external body to scrutinize the tender boards or an external mechanism to ensure transparency or specifications of a tender board [1,…
Explore
Q66 0/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework that covers defence and addresses collusion between bidders themselves or bidders and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) [1, 2].…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 66A, there is no legal framework that covers collusion in the procurment process [1, 2]. This indicator has therefore been marked…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 66A, there is no legal framework that covers collusion in the procurment process [1, 2]. This indicator has therefore been marked…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no training provided to address collusion in the procurement process. Sources confirmed that no training has been provided in the last five…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
There are formal documents and internal regulations to monitor, assess and report on the supplier’s services and delivery obligations. However, these regulations are not…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Following a search of the websites of the Parliament, the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Ministry of Finance, the government and other media sources,…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Procurement officers do not conduct any reporting as suppliers provide items directly to units or stocks. Procurement units do not receive the goods and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There are no known cases where suppliers and contractors have been punished, especially with strategic contracts regarding weapons, ranks or items of value more…
Explore
Q68 0/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework or a defined and clear mechanism that provides companies with the right to complain about malpractices and corrupt activities…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 68A, there is no legal framework that provides a platform or mechanism for companies to complain [1, 2]. This indicator has…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 68A, there is no legal framework that provides a platform or mechanism for companies to complain [1, 2]. This indicator has…
Explore
Q69 0/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Procurement officials and committees have no authority to sanction any supplier or individual who may have committed corrupt activities. Sanctions are based on the…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 69A, procurement officials have no authority to sanction suppliers or individuals implicit in corrupt activities. This indicator has therefore been marked…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 69A, procurement officials have no authority to sanction suppliers or individuals implicit in corrupt activities. This indicator has therefore been marked…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework that regulates offset contracts. Most of these contracts are made by the king’s office or his deputy, which makes…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Offset contracts are made through the commander in chief office or the MoD special procurement mechanism, so there is no oversight or due diligence…
Explore
Q71 6/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no policies or procedures concerning offset contracts. The absence of such policies has affected the way such contracts are being conducted. Each…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
All details about Ministry of Defence (MoD) procurement, including offset or non-offset contracts, are considered confidential. Therefore, there is no data available for the…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
As most of the offset contracts for strategic weapons and based on political allies and political pressure form exporting nations, there is no reporting…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Although most offset contracts are large and politically-motivated, in rare cases, some actions may be taken as a result of a lack of quality…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Most of the acquisitions of Bahrain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Bahrain Defence Force weapons are through offset contracts. They are not justified…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework that prohibits or controls the use of agents and intermediate agents in the procurement cycle. Indeed, many acquisitions are…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
As outlined in 73A, there is no legal framework that prohibits or controls the use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle [1,…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The financing packages for arms deals are not available, and when they are strategic procurements, communication from the Bahrain Defence Force and the Ministry…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The vast majority of acquisition decisions, especially strategic procurements, are made under the influence…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Although the country is small and it does not need much weaponry, there has…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are no domestic pressures that are grand in scale, but there could be…
Explore