Operational Risk:

High

Score:

35/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Bosnia and Herzegovina Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 25/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 25 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) adopted the Integrity and Fight Against Corruption Plan of the MoD for the period 2015-2019 with four chapters (Introduction,…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no evidence of a developed doctrine addressing corruption risks in operations in a document titled…
Explore
Q52 75/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) periodically organizes anti-corruption training for military personnel and civil servants, and senior level of command is in priority for…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
The Ministry of Defence’s response during the preparation for peacekeeping operations training on the Code of Ethics and Anti-corruption is organized for those who…
Explore
Application Score: NA / 100
Bosnia and Herzegovina does not conduct significant operations and, therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable. The AFBiH has not conducted any major military…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 25/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
According to the Ministry of Defence’s (MoD) written contribution, inspectors from the General Inspectorate of the MoD represent professional military staff which could be…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 50 / 100
According to the MoD’s written contribution, inspectors from the General Inspectorate of the MoD represent professional military staff which could be sent to the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
As noted above, there is no publicly available evidence on monitoring, which perhaps is due to the small number of personnel deployed who are…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 50/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Building Integrity in Peace Support Operations Course, implemented by Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) has aimed to deliver a skill set to…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
All staff that is deployed on international missions has training before deployment. This training is designed following the specifics of the operation [1]. Before…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Neither private military contractors nor private security providers are employed by defence institutions. According…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Neither private military contractors nor private security providers are employed by defence institutions. According…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Neither private military contractors nor private security providers are employed by defence institutions. According…
Explore