Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

11/100

Collapse
57 50/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Burundi has had a public procurement code since 2008, which was revised in 2018.…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
Burundi’s Public Procurement Code refers to the risk of corruption and contains clear provisions to mitigate it [1] [2] [3]. Article 35, paragraphs 11…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Generally speaking, there are many violations of the public procurement code in Burundi and in the defence and security sector in particular, the public…
Explore
58 17/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
The procurement process in the Defence sector is by no means formalizsed. It is managed on a discretionary basis by a small group of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Information on public contracts in the Defence sector is sometimes published. These are published in online newspapers, offline newspapers and at the offices of…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
There is a manual of administrative and financial procedures within the army which deals in a general way, without going into detail, with the…
Explore
59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Bodies such as Parliament, the Anti-Corruption Unit and the Court of Auditors have the formal power to control the awarding of public contracts in…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The control mechanisms are very inactive . Despite the powers conferred on them by the various laws, the reality is that they are unable…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
What little work is done by bodies such as the Brigade anti-corruption or the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Defence remains non-transparent .…
Explore
60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
Each budget year, an assessment of requirements is carried out within the army and purchases are planned. This assessment is updated throughout the budget…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
In the history of Burundi, there has never been any publication of the army’s annual needs assessments or of the resulting purchases. The relevant…
Explore
61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence purchases are rarely published. Occasionally, there are documents about food purchases in military camps. The total amount may be announced but there is…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data is rarely published, and on the rare occasions that it is, it is aggregate information that is not easy to read [1] [2].…
Explore
62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no established laws or procedures on how the government chooses its suppliers or subcontractors. Suppliers are not required to sign anti-corruption clauses…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
There are no established laws or procedures on how the government chooses its suppliers or subcontractors so this indicator is marked Not Applicable. [1][2]
Explore
63 8/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is no well-established defence and security strategy in Burundi. Procurement cannot therefore be based on a defence and security strategy that does not…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Defence can control or audit certain purchases within the army [1], but external bodies such as parliament…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
As there is no well-established defence strategy or clear forecasts for procurement [1], purchases are often made opportunistically at the whim and according to…
Explore
64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
There is no competition in Burundi’s defence procurement sector. The government works with a number of prefered suppliers. There are people who are always…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
No supervisory body is able to monitor or question the procedures or competition process for obtaining contracts within the defence sector [1] [2].
Explore
65 6/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
Article 355 of the Public Procurement Code regulates aspects relating to conflicts of interest. In particular, it prohibits civil servants involved in the public…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
There is no audit trail that would allow the control agencies to know the details of the people involved in designing invitations to tender,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement code which provide some regulations and code of conduct is publicly available online. [1] However, there is no transparency in the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no external verification of the particular specifications of calls for tender. The bodies that do try to look into this matter come…
Explore
66 13/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Article 361.1 of the Public Procurement Code prohibits collusion between bidders. It states that bidders that engage in collusion practices will incur penalties[1]. However…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
In theory, officials have the authority to pubish collusion. According to article 362 of the the Public Procurement Code , various sanctions exist to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
According to discussions with various people, cases of collusion certainly exist, but they are not publisicised. [1] [2] [3].
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no specific training on collusion for officials responsible for awarding public contracts [1] [2].
Explore
67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement Law mentions in its articles 256 to 259 the conditions for good execution and delivery. Articles 270 and 272 discuss sanctions…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
In the absence of well-established policies or procedures in this area, reporting on contractors’ compliance with their obligations is not transparent [1] [2]. It…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
Reports on the monitoring and completion of contracts are regularly produced and submitted to line managers, but they do not give rise to legal…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
It is not at all clear that the various breaches of contract are followed by appropriate action. The secrecy surrounding the whole process makes…
Explore
68 33/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Code provides for recourse mechanisms that individuals and legal entities can use to lodge complaints against poor procurement practices. These include…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 0 / 100
Public procurement review mechanisms are ineffective and rarely used in the defence sector. The secrecy and intimidation which characterizse this sector are among the…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 0 / 100
Legal entities and individuals bidding for public contracts are afraid to file complaints in the defence sector, because they are convinced that they will…
Explore
69 33/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Code clearly stipulates that individuals or legal entities who have been convicted of corruption or who present clear evidence of corruption-related…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 0 / 100
The lack of investigation or prosecution of corrupt suppliers is obvious [1]. In fact, most of the major suppliers in the defence sector have…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
There is no information on any sanctions against corrupt suppliers and these corrupt suppliers continue to benefit from other contracts regardless of their previous…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no law in Burundi prohibiting offset contracts [1] [2].
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There are no particular or specific anti-corruption requirements imposed by the government in relation to offset contracts [1] [2].
Explore
71 25/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
In Burundi, there are no formal policies or procedures regarding reporting and delivery obligations under offset contracts. It depends on the compromise between the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Details regarding offset contracts are not provided. [1] [2] The obscurity which marks the public procurement process in Burundi in general and the Defence…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 100 / 100
Public procurement managers provide regular reports on offset contracts. These reports are produced after each contract. They are checked separately by the Inspectorate General,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is a chain of compromises regarding the performance of these offset contracts that means that supplier failures are not reported. The reports are…
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Single-source offset contracts are not justified . They are entered into at the discretion of senior military officials, who issue directives to procurement officers…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no restrictions from the government on the use of agents and intermediaries and the government often uses agents and intermediaries in the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There are no restrictions from the government on the use of agents and intermediaries. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable. [1][2]
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There are no details relating to the financial aspects of arms contracts made public either before or after the signing of the contract or…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Burundi’s main arms suppliers are Russia and China and these two countries have long…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Burundi government sometimes cites the need to strenghthen its military capacity as the…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. It is clear that members of the political and military elite are under the…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question