Personnel Risk:

Low

Score:

81/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 67/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 75 / 100
In order to support the implementation of the ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’ (‘Richtlinie der Bundesregierung zur…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 75 / 100
In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on transparency, especially with regard to defence procurement. Former Minister von der Leyen consistently emphasised…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 50 / 100
At the unit level, specific provisions are in place to ensure that the internal service regulations can be implemented and rendered relevant for the…
Explore
Q35 100/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Public officials are liable for bribery if they demand, accept or allow themselves to be promised a benefit in exchange for the performance of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The annual Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (BMI) report on integrity and corruption prevention in the Federal Administration also outlines how…
Explore
Q36 50/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 25 / 100
Whistleblowers have some legal guarantees against arbitrary dismissal, however, there is no comprehensive whistleblower protection in Germany, nor is the term ‘whistleblower’ legally defined.…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 75 / 100
The administration-wide ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’ applies to the Ministry of Defence. It requires the establishment…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The current protection for whisteblowers in Germany is considered weak [1]. While the Federal Corruption Prevention Provisions provide some protection for internal whistleblowing, there…
Explore
Q37 75/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 100 / 100
The existence of high-risk positions is recognised; the ministry therefore conducts regular risk assessments to identify such positions. For instance, in a recent assessment…
Explore
Selection process Score: 75 / 100
There is a risk analysis mechanism in place to identify positions with a high risk of corruption [1]. The 2017 BMI Report on Corruption…
Explore
Oversight Score: 50 / 100
A recently released sustainability report explains that a specialist unit (‘Unit R II 6’, now ‘Unit R III 1’) performs a risk analysis to…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 100/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 100 / 100
The number of civilian and military personnel is provided on the Ministry’s website and updated regularly (a new website was launched recently; at the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The number of civilian and military staff is provided on the Ministry’s website, including a breakdown into various rank brackets. There is further breakdown…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
A general search was conducted of publications in major German media outlets over the past five years (FAZ, Spiegel, Sueddeutsche Zeitung). No indication was…
Explore
Q39 100/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 100 / 100
Payments are specified in a dedicated law on civil service payments (‘Bundesbesoldungsordnung’) [1]. The legal text is easily accessible online and the payment brackets…
Explore
Allowances Score: 100 / 100
Allowances are also regulated by the law on civil service payments (‘Bundesbesoldungsordnung’) [1], which stipulates specific allowances, e.g. for deployment abroad (Auslandsverwendungszuschlag) or family…
Explore
Q40 83/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The Armed Forces Ombudsman (the ‘Parliamentary Commissioner for the German Armed Forces’) serves as a contact point for any job-related grievances of soldiers. The…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
The Armed Forces Ombudsman (the ‘Parliamentary Commissioner for the German Armed Forces’) serves as a contact point for any job-related grievances of soldiers. The…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Payments and allowances are specified in a dedicated law on civil service payments (‘Bundesbesoldungsordnung’) [1]. The law also stipulates specific allowances, e.g. for deployment…
Explore
Q41 33/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
The appointment process for middle and top-level personnel is prescribed in Central Service Regulation A-1340/46 (‘Auswahl von militärischem Personal für die Besetzung von Dienstposten’)…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The process is supervised by an advisory panel (‘Beteiligungsgremien’), which includes, for example, a representative of the Inspector General of the Bundeswehr (GenInspBw), as…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Information about the appointment/promotion of senior personnel is only circulated within the Armed Forces/Ministry of Defence [1].
Explore
Q42 44/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
The promotion of military personnel is formalised by the ‘Regulations governing careers in the military profession’ (‘Soldatenlaufbahnverordnung’) [1]. The process is regulated by a…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 100 / 100
The Federal Civil Service Act (Bundesbeamtengesetz) stipulates that quick promotions are at odds with the mentality of the public administration. For 2018, the Ministry…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Information about the appointment/promotion of senior personnel is only circulated within the Armed Forces/Ministry of Defence (see also Q41C) [1].
Explore
Frequency Score: 0 / 100
Promotions of military personnel (especially higher ranks) are only published within the Armed Forces and/or BMVg management. No information is communicated publicly.
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as conscription in Germany has been suspended since 2011 [1].
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as conscription in Germany has been suspended since 2011 [1].
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as conscription in Germany has been suspended since 2011 [1].
Explore
Q44 88/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 75 / 100
Offering/taking bribes is considered a criminal act according to prevailing legal provisions, notably the Criminal Code (see also Q35A) [1,2]. However, there is no…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Bribery can result in imprisonment for up to ten years (depending on the severity of the case). If a soldier or official is charged…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
With regard to the enforcement of general bribery legislations, there is evidence that there is strict investigation and prosecution (see also Q35B) [1]. No…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The Federal Office of Administration is in charge of salary payments. Payments are governed by the ‘Federal Civil Service Remuneration Act’ (‘Bundesbesoldungsordnung’) [1]. Superiors…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 100/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
Military personnel are subject to the ‘Rules on Integrity (‘Regelungen zur Integrität’) [1], the Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The military is subject to a Code of Conduct that applies to public officials in general. This general code is an annex to the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The military is subject to a Code of Conduct that applies to public officials in general. This general code is an annex to the…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Corruption prevention is addressed in the induction training. This training covers the ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’,…
Explore
Q47 100/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
The ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’ [1] includes a ‘Code of Conduct Against Corruption’ as an annex,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Code of Conduct and the Rules on Integrity are available to staff and the general public via official websites [1,2]. The ‘Federal Government…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The annual report on corruption prevention issued by the Ministry of the Interior provides details of corruption cases and investigations for each federal ministry…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
The ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’ specifies that awareness-raising training should be conducted with staff upon entering…
Explore
Q48 83/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
According to the BMI report ‘Korruptionsprävention in der Bundesverwaltung’ (‘Corruption Prevention in the Federal Administration’), there are specialised training units within the Armed Forces…
Explore
Regularity Score: 75 / 100
The risks and consequences of corruption are covered as part of the regular induction training (‘Erstbelehrung’). The ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 100 / 100
Corruption training features as part of the induction training and the regular staff training. It applies to military and civilian personnel as well as…
Explore
Q49 75/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
According to the ‘Federal Government Directive Concerning the Prevention of Corruption in the Federal Administration’, suspected corruption cases must be shared with prosecutors and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The report ‘Korruptionsprävention in der Bundesverwaltung’ (‘Corruption Prevention in the Federal Administration’) provides some details of the context of allegations and the subsequent proceedings.…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Suspected acts of corruption are generally investigated and prosecuted through formal processes without undue political influence. However, in the case of the recent consultant…
Explore
Q50 100/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Facilitation payments are illegal and constitute a criminal offence for both the party giving the payment and the party receiving it (see Articles 332…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
If there is a legitimate suspicion of corrupt activity, Unit R III 1 (ES) of the Ministry of Defence must be informed so that…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 100 / 100
The annual corruption prevention report published by the Ministry of the Interior in 2018 reports five cases of potential corruption. In one of these…
Explore