Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

26/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 25/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The country has clear and comprehensive legislation that covers all defence and national security…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
In the country’s legislation, corruption risks are tackled in line with the European Directives [1]. However, it is very broad. As the law provides…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Generally, the enforcement of public procurement rules in Hungary has been weak, despite the relatively strong/good laws. The XXX/2016 law [1] is used as…
Explore
Q58 42/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 25 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is partially done in line with the law on public procurement [1]. The assessment of needs is not entirely formal;…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The defence procurement cycle for items procured in open procurement is more or less transparent. Information on the annual procurement plan, calls for offers,…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
As noted in 58A the defence procurement cycle is partially formal [1, 2], the assessment of needs is not an entirely formal process. Different…
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
There is zero oversight on major military procurements and opposition members of the Defence Committee claim that they are also not informed on the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. While the oversight is non-existing for closed procurements (that is larger for 2018 then the military budget…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. The Budapest based Corruption Research Center ranked the Hungarian system as 38 out of the 61 countries…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
The government published no forward planning for potential purchases. According to the interviewees conducted, no such long-term document exists at all. There is no…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
Only sporadic information is available on the planned purchases, and it is far from comprehensive [1]. The information published often lacks details, including deadlines…
Explore
Q61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Most defence purchases are made public. The smaller the purchase, the greater the chance of accessing detailed information on the purchase [1]. In larger…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data is available in case of smaller purchases, but for the important military procurments no data available. The data of smaller purchases is accessable…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
Most companies bidding have to register as a NATO Commercial and Governmental Entity (NCAGE). This registration requires several steps to verify transparency [1] including…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
When procurement is completed through an open tender these policies are implemented, for the most part. There is no problem with open tenders (e.g.…
Explore
Q63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
Although the National Security Strategy(NSS) [1] and the National Military Strategy (NMS) [2] of Hungary were approved in 2012, the document is far too…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Currently, there is no scrutiny of the actual purchases [1]. Members of the Parliamentary Commission have no access to the documents and details of…
Explore
Purchases Score: 25 / 100
Purchases are outside the national strategy [1], and they refer to the Zrinyi 2026 Military Development Plan from 2017 [2].
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 25/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. Currently, there is limited publicly available data that clarifies how much procurement is open-source. Although…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
According to the law, the Public Procurement Council can terminate bids in single-source competitions and repeat the tender; however, there has been no case…
Explore
Q65 6/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has a multi-level procurement system. However, in former consultations with Deputy State Secretary Siklósi in 2017, he has highlighted…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
For major military procurements, there is no audit trail [1]. Neither the total value of the procurements have been made public recently, nor any…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no public information on the operation and composition of tender boards availble online. Source 6 described their operation as ad hoc and…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The 320/2015. (X. 30) government decree on the monitoring and authorisation of public procurements does not require the scrutiny of the specification of public…
Explore
Q66 38/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
The country has laws in place that prohibit collusion. It is important to note that these laws apply to the defence sector as well.…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 25 / 100
Procurement officials have limited power to exclude companies, but, they can initiate investigations with the relevant authorities [1]. The two relevant authorities are the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There are no known cases of collusion, as such this indicator is scored Not Applicable. For important procurements, authorities do not have the tools…
Explore
Training Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator, as no information is available on the frequency of the training.
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 25/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
The Public Procurement Authority prepared detailed guides [1] for public procurement officials on how to monitor, assess and report upon a supplier’s service and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
When there has been a public procurement the information is available on the relevant websites [1, 2]. Procurements can be searched by individuals seeking…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
According to the Law on Public Procurement, the contracting authority shall internally audit the procurement procedures. When reporting on the delivery of obligations, the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Although transparency is minimal some information was gathered through interviews. Based on the responses it is clear that when it comes politically neutral contracts…
Explore
Q68 42/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 25 / 100
The most important military procurements are not subject to open public tenders. In case of those procurements that are subject of the tender process,…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
The effectiveness and accessibility of open tenders are high. However, in volume and importance, those bids are marginal compared to the major defence procurements…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
Source 6 highlighted that companies rarely use the Public Procurement Authority as they are afraid that they will be excluded from future business. However,…
Explore
Q69 67/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Although procurement officials – and the even more Central Procurement Authority [1], as well as the Central Procurement Council, have the right to sanction…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
As described earlier politics can derail any investigation and there have been several cases when the prosecutor general stopped investigations. The most important case…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The Central Procurement Council has banned or terminated companies from participating in public procurement in the previous years. However, banning companies from further competitions…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 100/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1].
Explore
Due diligence Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore
Monitoring Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: NA / 100
Since the new EU level regulations have come into force, there have been no ongoing or projected offset programmes in the country [1]. As…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 25/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Official public announcements do not mention the use of intermediaries during procurements [1]. Clear rules on the use of them are also missing. However,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There are no known cases where sanctions have been applied, as such we are not able to provide a score for this indicator and…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The website of the Office for Defence Management of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) [1] is responsible for publishing information on defence procurement processes.…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Deals often take into account the wider geopolitical context, when it comes to major…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government rarely justifies its defence procurements with credible and detailed military needs.
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. In Hungary, there have been practically no cases when domestic pressure (meaning that pressure…
Explore