Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

13/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Lithuania Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The country has a comprehensive and detailed military doctrine which was adopted in 2010 and revised in 2016. However, the country does not consider…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The doctrine is made publicly available and can be found online on the Lithuanian Armed Forces website [1]. However, as mentioned in question 51A,…
Explore
Q52 25/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
The 2016-2017 report on the effectiveness of corruption prevention and control in the defence sector indicates that there are lectures on corruption prevention at…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
The 2016 Military Strategy of the Republic of Lithuania does not mention corruption as a strategic issue in any way. The National Security Strategy…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
The Action Plan for the Anti-Corruption Programme of the System of Defence 2017-2021, Action 2.5, states that the deadline for the informing the Department…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 13/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Lithuanian troops join partners’ units because Lithuania sends only a few troops on missions so sending trained professionals to monitor corruption risk would not…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
The Assessor found no evidence of monitoring and evaluation guidance for missions regarding corruption risk monitoring. The interviewees note that Lithuanian troops join partners’…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The Assessor found no evidence of monitoring and evaluation guidance for missions regarding corruption risk monitoring. The interviewees note that Lithuanian troops join partners’…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 25/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that such training is provided in peacekeeping missions [1].Permission for Lithuanian servicemen to take part in international operations and peace-keeping…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
There is no evidence that such training is provided in peacekeeping missions [1].Permission for Lithuanian servicemen to take part in international operations and peace-keeping…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no information or evidence that private military contractors have ever been employed.…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Lithuania do not employ Private Military Companies and has no policies or laws on…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Lithuania do not employ Private Military Companies and has no policies or laws on…
Explore