Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

9/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Myanmar Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The Tatmadaw’s doctrines on the planning of operations are not publicly available. We do not have access to any information indicating whether the Tatmadaw…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Since there is no doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issure, this indicator is marked Not Applicable [1,2].
Explore
Q52 25/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
At the National Defence College, professors from foreign and local universities give lectures about corruption to the Commanders of the Tatmadaw. There are also…
Explore
Q53 NEI/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as the Tatmadaw’s doctrines on the planning of operations are not publicly available. The assessors…
Explore
Application Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as the Tatmadaw’s planning of operations is not publicly available.
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The Tatmadaw’s doctrines on the planning of operations are not publicly available. The assessors do not have access to any information indicating whether the…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
Although there are no professionals delpoyed, there are scrutiny officers posted at the headquarters tribunal [1]. However, there is no evidence of M&E guidance…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as Myanmar does not deploy any expert personnel for corruption monitoring.
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 13/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Although there are no training courses authorised by the command, meetings and discussions about anti-corruption have been held in respective regiments [1]. Another interviewee…
Explore
Training Score: 25 / 100
Although training on corruption issues has been provided for senior military personnel at the National Defence College, this training focusses on general corruption awareness…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Planning and Economic Development and the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Since the Private Security Law is yet to be developed, there are no provisions…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Since the Private Security Law is yet to be developed, there is currently no…
Explore