Operational Risk:

Moderate

Score:

50/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Norway Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 75/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 50 / 100
The present Norwegian Armed Forces’ Joint Operational Doctrine was published in 2019 and is an updated version of the previous one published in 2014…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Joint Military Doctrine is available online and can be downloaded from the website of the Norwegian Joint Staff College [1].
Explore
Q52 50/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
Corruption issues are generally covered during military education like Basic Officer Training (Grunnleggende offiserutdanning) and Advanced Officer Training (Videregående offiserutdanning). It is not a…
Explore
Q53 63/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 75 / 100
Corruption as a strategic issue is taken into account especially in the forward planning of operations in high risk areas, i.e. places characterised by…
Explore
Application Score: 50 / 100
Corruption as a strategic issue is taken into account mainly in the forward planning of operations in high risk areas, and not in all…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 13/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Norway does not deploy trained personnel for corruption monitoring [1].
Explore
M&E policy Score: 25 / 100
The Norwegian Armed Forces do not have specific M&E guidance for missions on how to monitor corruption risks, but pay attention to ensuring that…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable because Norway does not deploy any personnel for corruption monitoring within missions [1].
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 50/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
There is generally very little local contracting on international military operations [1]. There are no specific guidelines on corruption risks in contracting while on…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The Action Plan “Attitudes, Ethics and Leadership” describes contacts with business, including local business in operations, as one of the fields that training and…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Norway is a signatory of the Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Regulation on Ship Security requires that any incident of attack involving the use…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. |In the event of corruption or any other criminal offence involving a PMC, the…
Explore