Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Oman Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
Oman does not have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations. No doctrine or statements relating to procedures of the Sultani…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, because there is no military doctrine. The sole reference to military doctrine in the Omani media is…
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of training in corruption issues for commanders taking place in Oman. The armed forces have their own military colleges, in…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
As outlined in Q51, there is no military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue in operations, therefore there is no evidence to support…
Explore
Application Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, because corruption is not taken into consideration in forward planning. The Omani Royal Armed Forces do not…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of the deployment of trained personnel for corruption monitoring in the field. As outlined above there is no anti-corruption training…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any monitoring and evaluation guidance available for missions on how to monitor corruption risks (1), (2). As stated above…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there is no evidence that monitoring and evaluation of corruption risks takes place. Reports concerning the…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is a guideline relevant to corruption risks in contracting; however, it is general and does not define corruption or bribery and lacks specific…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
No anti-corruption training was found. The State Audit Institute has held anti-corruption training within other ministries, according to its website, there is no information…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no law or policy dedicated solely to PMCs, nor is there evidence…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no legislation explicitly targeting PMCs (1), (2). There is no reference to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are no policies explicitly applicable to employing PMCs in Oman (1). In cases…
Explore