Q11.
Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?
11a. Acquisition planning process
Score
SCORE: 25/100
Rubric
Palestine score: 25/100
Score: 0/100
There is no defined process for acquisition planning.
Score: 25/100
The process for acquisition planning is in place but it is not clear, and internal functions are not separated. There are very few, if any, explicit connections made between specific purchases and defence strategy requirements.
Score: 50/100
There is a process for acquisition planning in place, internal acquisition functions are separated, e.g. budget, commercial, and finance. There are few, if any, explicit connections between specific purchases and defence strategy requirements.
Score: 75/100
There is a clear process for acquisition planning in place, but internal acquisition planning functions are not separated, e.g. budget, commercial, and finance. Connections between specific purchases and defence strategy requirements are made explicit.
Score: 100/100
There is a clear process for the entire acquisition planning cycle in place, with formally separate internal acquisition planning functions, e.g., budget, commercial, and finance. Connections between specific purchases and defence strategy requirements are made explicit.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
11b. Transparency
Score
SCORE: 0/100
Rubric
Palestine score: 0/100
Score: 0/100
There is no transparency of the acquisition planning process.
Score: 25/100
The public has limited access to information about the process itself, because a great deal of information is excluded from publication, or not provided upon request.
Score: 50/100
The public has access to information about the process itself, but some items of information may be excluded from publication.
Score: 75/100
The public has access to information about the process itself, but information may be delayed or not timely published.
Score: 100/100
The public has access to information about the entire process itself so that information can be obtained as needed. Information that is proactively published includes justification of purchases, lines of responsibility, timelines, mechanisms, and outcomes.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
11c. External oversight
Score
SCORE: 0/100
Rubric
Palestine score: 0/100
Score: 0/100
There is no external oversight of the acquisition planning process.
Score: 25/100
These oversight functions either simply review the figures or check that the internal audit have reviewed the figures.
Score: 50/100
These oversight functions assess basic performance, but fail to assess long-term outcomes or the legitimacy of plans. Parliament is not involved in oversight of acquisition planning.
Score: 75/100
These oversight functions assess performance, and the country's long-term acquisition plans, but they fail to assess the legitimacy of plans. Parliament is also involved in oversight of acquisition planning.
Score: 100/100
There are strong external oversight functions that assess the country's long-term acquisition plans, their legitimacy and likelihood that plans are going to function properly. Parliament is also involved in oversight of acquisition planning.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 11a. Acquisition planning process | 11b. Transparency | 11c. External oversight |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Algeria | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Angola | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Argentina | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Armenia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Australia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Bahrain | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Bangladesh | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Belgium | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Botswana | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Brazil | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Cameroon | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Canada | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Chile | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
China | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Colombia | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Cote d'Ivoire | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Denmark | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Egypt | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Estonia | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Finland | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
France | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Germany | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Ghana | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Greece | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Hungary | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
India | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Indonesia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Iran | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Iraq | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Italy | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Japan | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Jordan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Kenya | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Kosovo | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kuwait | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Latvia | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Lebanon | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Lithuania | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Malaysia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Mali | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Mexico | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Montenegro | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Morocco | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Myanmar | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Netherlands | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
New Zealand | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Niger | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Nigeria | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
North Macedonia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Norway | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Oman | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Palestine | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Philippines | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Poland | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Portugal | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Qatar | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Russia | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Serbia | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Singapore | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
South Africa | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
South Korea | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
South Sudan | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | NEI |
Spain | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Sudan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Sweden | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Switzerland | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Taiwan | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Tanzania | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Thailand | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Tunisia | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Turkey | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Uganda | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Ukraine | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
United Kingdom | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
United States | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Venezuela | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Zimbabwe | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 |