Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

50/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 58/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
There are national defence and security committees in both the Senate and the House of Representatives which have oversight functions covered by the Philippine…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
The Legislature is mandated to review defence policy, including through formal processes such as the Defence Secretary’s attendance of hearings on budget proposals [1].…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The Philippine Legislature continues to occasionally raise defence-related concerns, including concerns over funding sources, items in the defence budget, or specific actions such as…
Explore
Q2 58/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
In both houses of Congress there are oversight committees responsible for scrutinising and demanding information on different aspects of the defence department such as…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
An interviewed Member of the House of Representatives has stated that, while committee members have some degree of knowledge on defence and security, there…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 25 / 100
The committee can review the implementation of existing defence and security policy with respect to important events. The decision to review is dependent on…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
By enacting an annual General Appropriations Act, Congress is able to mandate officials from the security sector, as well as other oversight institutions in…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 50 / 100
Congress is generally empowerd by laws and its own rules to perform oversight [1]. Both chambers (the House and Senate) may conduct formal inquiries…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The defence department internally evaluates all proposals brought forward by Congress; however, due to political influence, this does not happen regularly. For example, at…
Explore
Q3 44/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
The National Security Policy (NSP) and the National Security Strategy of 2018 documents contain a statement of principles which sets out the strategic goals…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 25 / 100
The issues and aspirations set out in the Philippines’ defence policy and defence strategy are modest and short-term [1, 2]. Both are geared towards…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
The AFP established a Multi-Sectoral Governance Council (MSGC) which, composed of members from business, academia and civil society, is tasked with guiding the military…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The national security policy and security strategy of the current administration were published ten months and two years ago respectively after the President took…
Explore
Q4 58/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
The Philippine Constitution specifies that government institutions, including those in the defence and security sector, should be open to engaging other non-governmental actors which…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
Protections are enjoyed but access and freedoms are limited and security continues to be an issue in some cases [1]. Rights groups including CIVICUS…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 75 / 100
CSO engagement occurs but not with consistent depth and intensity, including with respect to corruption-related issues more directly [1, 2]. The armed forces has…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
The Philippines is not a significant defence exporter and signed the UNCAC on December 9, 2003 and ratified it on November 8, 2006 [1,…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
At the first review cycle of UNCAC conducted by Bangladesh and Egypt in August 2012, the Philippines was found compliant in 55 out of…
Explore
Q6 50/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 50 / 100
There is wider public discussion and debate on defence issues, but this is often limited to broad issues (for example the balance between internal…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
Government engagement in public discourse involves media briefings tied to major events, where wide-ranging questions are clarified. There is occassional participation in think tank…
Explore
Q7 88/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
The Philippines has several anti-corruption policies that applies to the defense sector. These include the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, An Act Defining and…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 75 / 100
Philippine Defence Transformation Roadmap (PDTR) 2028 is a strategic plan that investigates the performance, governance, and systems of the defence sector [1, 2]. The…
Explore
Q8 33/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 50 / 100
Units are in place, including the Office of Ethical Standards and Public Accountability (OESPA), Office of the Judge Advocate General (OTJAG), and the Inspector…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The Office of the Inspector General and the Office of Ethical Standards and Public Accountability are under the chain of command of the Armed…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Staff within the units, especially in the OESPA that evaluates the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Networth (SALN) of military personnel understand the corruption…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. According to public polls, trust in the defence institutions has increased since 2016, especially…
Explore
Q10 75/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 100 / 100
The Philippine Defence Transformation Roadmap (PDTR) 2028 was formulated to carry on the institutionalisation of the reform measures identified in the Philippine Defence Reform…
Explore
Regularity Score: 50 / 100
Using the Institute for Solidarity in Asia’s Performance Governance System, the timeline of the assessment is based on how the armed forces and its…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 75 / 100
The armed forces has established a multi-sectoral governance council (MSGC) composed of members from business, academia and civil society to guide the armed forces…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 67/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
Programme planning and the procurement cycle are conducted in accordance with the Defence System of Management (DSOM), which treats strategic planning, capability assessment, acquisition…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Improvements have been made but, according to media reports, some information is still either excluded or not disclosed in a timely fashion [1, 2].…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
Congress serves as the oversight committee to monitor and oversee the implementation of the AFP modernisation and development programme [1]. The committee is mandated…
Explore
Q12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Budgets and financial reports are publicly available online, including in approved General Appropriations Acts with previous reports available as well. The budget provides details,…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
In accordance with the annual budget cycle set out by the DBM, the Legislature usually has more than two months to deliberate before the…
Explore
Q13 50/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Scrutiny is chiefly in the hands of the House and Senate Committee on Appropriations and other committees and interested congressional members who have the…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
Periodic concerns are raised on specific line items in the budget, but amendments of defence budgets during the period in question were limited and…
Explore
Q14 50/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The defence budget is published and made available, including through the General Appropriations Act (GAA); however explanations are minimal and inaccessible to non-experts [1,…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
While most budget areas are published with some level of detail, oversight by members of Congress does exist [1, 2]; certain areas of the…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 50 / 100
Defence budget hearings are open to the public and the media and citizens can watch the proceedings online [1]. Citizens can also send information…
Explore
Q15 42/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Publication of income sources is limited and selective. Proceeds from the properties being disposed by the state-run Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) go…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Proceeds from asset disposal through the BCDA are subject to the scrutiny and independent review of the Commission on Audit [1, 2]. The Internal…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Public scrutiny exists, including by the media and CSOs, but is not always in-depth or consistent; this is in part due to the lack…
Explore
Q16 0/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
The Internal Audit Unit does not review ongoing defence expenditures; instead, its role is to evaluate whether or not internal control components are well-designed…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as the Internal Audit Unit does not review ongoing defense expenditures [1].
Explore
External scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as the Internal Audit Unit does not review ongoing defense expenditures [1].
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as the Internal Audit Unit does not review ongoing defense expenditures [1].
Explore
Q17 56/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
External auditing is primarily done by the Commission on Audit (COA) [1, 2]. Based on the 1978 State Audit Code of the Philippines, the…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
In terms of defining the scope and methods of its auditing and examination procedures, the COA has exclusive authority, although it does have to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Once released by the COA, the Annual Audit Report is published online. However the report excludes the working papers used to produce audit reports…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
According to a transmittal letter addressed to the Defence Secretary by the COA in April 2018, six out of 41 of the 2017 recommendations…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 45/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
There is no prohibition against military involvment in natural resource extraction. The Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) for instance is a development corporation…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
The Defence Department is involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resources, but activity is regulated [1,2]. As noted in 18A, the BCDA…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
The current Environment and Natural Resources Secretary is a retired military officer who has been criticised for protecting big mining companies [1]. Although this…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The interests of the defence institution are publicly declared such as the list of properties that are available for lease and some information on…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Using a 2017 Commission on Audit report and a statement by the Chair of the AFP’s Joint Chiefs [1], a member of Congress filed…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 0/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 0 / 100
Repeated reports have surfaced about links between the Philippine military and organised syndicates both within the country and abroad [1, 2]. One report indicated…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
Awareness of the problem is evident but, beyond occassional remarks regarding the overall state of the problem or periodic crackdowns of individual cases, there…
Explore
Q20 67/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
There is a Provost Marshall unit in each of the services within the AFP tasked with investigating complaints linked to administrative cases [1]. Complaints…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The 1987 Constitution made the Office of the Ombudsman a fiscally autonomous body [1] but, in its 2020 proposed budget, the office’s anti-corruption enforcement…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Undue political influence from the executive fast-tracks the investigation of cases. For example, upon receipt of a complaint from the Office of the President,…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 25/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Senate’s 18th Congress created a Select Oversight Committee on Intelligence and Confidential Funds, Programmes and Activities [1]. The committee’s powers and functions include:…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Though oversight exists, it is uneven and limited [1, 2]. The COA admitted it was having difficulty tracing intelligence budgets [3]. The Select Committee…
Explore
Q22 33/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 25 / 100
Military officers appointed to senior intelligence services should be clear of human rights violations and are subject to investigation of their suitability for the…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 25 / 100
While the AFP Board of Generals pays particular attention to background and experience (e.g. schooling, operation achievements) of the names it recommends to the…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
The vetting process is done internally by the Board of Generals then endorsed by the Defense Secretary before submitting to the President for approval.…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 50/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 50 / 100
The Philippines has signed the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) but has yet to ratify it [1]. To support the ratification process, the country has…
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as the Philippines has signed the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) but has yet to ratify it [1] [2].
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as the Philippines is not an arms exporter [1] [2].
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 25/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Republic Act 1827, An Act to Regulate Lobbying in the Congress of the Philippines and in the Commission on Appointments defines lobbying as the…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: 0 / 100
As the Lobbying Law is poorly implemented, details of interactions by public officials or conflict of interests that have been identified are either not…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: 50 / 100
A lobbyist must register their name, the business address of their principal and the subject or subjects of legislation or pending appointment to which…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The legislation does not specifically identify an oversight entity. The individuals who control the records and lobbying activities are the Secretaries of the Houses…
Explore