Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

9/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Qatar has no defence legislation that covers defence and national security purchases [1,2]. The…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
Qatar has no procurement legislation that covers defence and national security procurement [1,2,3,4,5].
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as Qatar has no procurement legislation that covers defence and national security procurement [1,2,3,4,5], and thus…
Explore
Q58 17/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is partially formalized. There are internal guidelines and mechanisms in the armed forces and in other security agencies that regulate…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Whilst in theory, each defence and security institution should have their own procurement cycle process, in practice, these processes are not formalised, are confidential,…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
There are internal guidelines and mechanisms in the armed forces and in other security agencies that regulate the procurement process [1,2]. This is due…
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The defence and security institutions in Qatar do not have any oversight mechanisms. Oversight mechanisms are almost non-existent in the armed forces and the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable as there are no procurement oversight mechanisms (see Q59A). The oversight mechanisms are vague, basic, and inefficient,…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable as there are no procurement oversight mechanisms (see Q59A). There are no defence procurement oversight mechanisms in…
Explore
Q60 13/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Although Qatar does not release much information about the defence sector, our sources confirm that the MoD has a strategic unit that assesses its…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There is no public information available on planned purchases. However, strategic purchases such as jets and tanks are made public as a part of…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The Qatari Government does not release any information in relation to defence purchases on its official website. The only online presence of the MoD…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
It has been established that the Qatari Government does not release any official information about its purchases through official means. [1] As there is…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of laws or procedures detailing how the Government discriminates in its selection of suppliers. Suppliers or sub-contractors are not required…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because there is no evidence of laws or procedures detailing how the Government discriminates in its selection…
Explore
Q63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of the existence of a defence procurement strategy. The only information of relevance to Qatar’s defence procurement is linked to…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
It has been established throughout this assessment that the defence sector is not typically subject to any form of scrutiny, and that its purchases…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
As has been established above, Qatar does not seem to have a national security and defence strategy, or its strategy is kept secret. Due…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
The majority of defence procurement is not conducted through open competition, and there is no evidence of a single defence competition announcement. It has…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Although there is no external oversight mechanism, and there is very little internal oversight mechanism, these units have no power to question or influence…
Explore
Q65 6/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
There is little to no information about defence and military procurement. There are internal tender boards that bidders have access to. Such boards are…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
As there are no official oversight mechanisms (external) and minimal internal oversights, access to data by these units is limited to non-existent. [1] Besides…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
As the tender board is restricted, one can conclude that there is no transparency. In many cases, tender boards contain a call for bidding,…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As there are no official oversight mechanisms (external) and minimal internal oversights, access to data by these units is limited to non-existent. [1] Besides…
Explore
Q66 0/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There are very limited guidelines that deal with defence procurement in general. These guidelines and internal policies do not address collusion in defence procurement…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of a legal framework discouraging and punishing collusion between bidders, assessing its…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This sub-indicator has been marked as Not Applicable, as with the lack of a legal framework discouraging and punishing collusion between bidders, assessing its…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that procurement officials receive training on identifying collusion in bidding practices [1,2].
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 19/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
There are some formal policies and procedures outlining how to monitor, assess and report on a supplier’s service and/or delivery obligations as part of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Reporting on delivery obligations occur via templates and forms. These forms are filled in by officers and then sent to the relevant units (finance,…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
In procurement, officials usually conduct monitoring activities to ensure that deliveries comply with contractual obligations, but do not look through them. This happens to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
There are cases where breaches of contract are sanctioned. These cases could include poor quality of goods (food, clothes, or services). In general, no…
Explore
Q68 33/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 50 / 100
Although most of the tenders are single sourced, there are rare cases when bidders have needed to complain. To do so, they use informal…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
As Qatar is a small country, with a small number of soldiers and military personnel, there are rare cases when a supplier needs to…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 0 / 100
Companies prefer not to complain; they normally use informal channels with commanders and officials to solve problems such as collusion and mis-practices, so that…
Explore
Q69 0/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Procurement officials have no authority or power to sanction the corrupt activities of suppliers. Commanders, heads of units, and procurement committees may do this.…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because procurement officials have no authority or power to sanction the corrupt activities of suppliers (see Q69A)..…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because procurement officials have no authority or power to sanction the corrupt activities of suppliers (see Q69A)..…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Qatar has no requirements or formal policies to manage offset contracts, including reporting, monitoring, and delivery obligations. [1,2,3,4] Offset contracts are spread out in…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, the government does not impose any anti-corruption regulations within the armed forces or the MoD agencies/ units. Therefore, it is…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
Qatar has no requirements or formal policies to manage offset contracts, including reporting, monitoring, and delivery obligations. [1,2,3,4] Offset contracts are spread out in…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Offset contracts are not available for the public. [1,2,3] However, in some cases, they are published if they include large sums and strategic deals…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The Government’s monitoring of offset contracts is minimal. Officials within the armed forces or the MoD have no authority to monitor or report on…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is a total lack of transparency in offset contracting, as these contracts are mostly granted by the Emir office through the officer of…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
As the country does not have a mechanism of public deliberation, it is hard to justify offset contracts. [1] Additionally, offset contracts are granted…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 75/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
There is a law that manages and restricts the work of agents and intermediaries. Law No. 8 (2002) on Organization of Business of Commercial…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
Sanctions apply whenever agents are misused. But this has happened very few times in the last five years. [1]
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There are no details available to the public about financing packages surrounding arms deals, and there is no evidence whether a financing package exists…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. It is extremely common for defence decisions to be driven by the political influence…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. It has become clear throughout this assessment that the defence sector is not subject…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Domestic political pressure, in relation to defence decisions, does not exist. [1] The country has…
Explore