Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

2/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 13/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Sudan does not have any sector-specific procurement laws that cover defence and security procurement,…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 25 / 100
Although the Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Public Assets Act mentions articles entitled ‘Fraud and Corruption (Article 54), ‘Actions affecting the public servant’…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Sudan’s defence procurement activites are highly secretive. Historically, Sudan’s defence sector institutions and informal affiliates have obtained revenue via transactions – formal and informal,…
Explore
Q58 8/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
Sudan does not have any sector-specific procurement laws that cover defence and security procurement, but Parliament did pass the Sudan Public Procurement, Contracting and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The 2010 Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Public Assets Act of the Republic of Sudan is very general. It is not a long…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
The Government of Sudan’s general ‘Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Public Assets Act, 2010’ stipulates that each ministry shall be responsible for its…
Explore
Q59 0/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Public Assets Act of the Republic of Sudan, 2010 [1], outlines general procurement processes, but there is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’, given that a thorough review of internet sources and interviews with two experts on Sudan’s security sector yielded…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because, since there is no evidence that Sudan’s defence procurement activities are, in practice, subject to oversight mechanisms…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
Phone interviews with independent experts suggested that the Government of Sudan does not undertake any forward planning for potential purchases or does not make…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
Sudan’s defence purchase planning is deliberately kept secret. Independent experts on Sudan’s defence sector verified that solicitations and public notices of intent to solicit…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
The government is highly secretive about its defence purchases. Phone interviews with a Sudan defence sector expert [1] confirmed that even the total defence…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
No data on actual defence purchases was available on the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior or Finance [1,2,3]. The Ministry of Finance…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence to suggest that Sudan’s defence organisations require the businesses they own or the businesses to which they award contracts to…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because there are no policies that require anti-corruption standards in defence procurement contracts. In fact, it is likely…
Explore
Q63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found to suggest that any national defence and/or national security strategies exist or that procurement planning is centralised or even conducted…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found to suggest that defence purchases are formally scrutinised by any government entities, independent or not. The only perceivable scrutiny of…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
No evidence was found to suggest that defence purchases are based on any requirements set by the Ministry of Defence, Office of the Presidency…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
Article 19 of Sudan’s 2010 Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Assets Act requires procuring authorities within the Government of Sudan to widely broadcast…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Sudan’s defence procurements are generally secret and therefore do not enable open competition. In any case, no evidence could be found in Sudan’s Public…
Explore
Q65 0/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
GAN Integrity’s Sudan report, published on its Risk and Compliance Portal, summarises as follows: ‘Public procurement in Sudan presents companies with a very high…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
A 2017 report by Transparency International states that the ‘lack of transparency and information [about contracting processes] allows for a discretionary administration of the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Since there is no evidence that tender boards are actually used in Sudan’s defence sector (for example, the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Since tenders, to the extent that they are used in the defence sector, are not easily accessible either to the public or to ministries…
Explore
Q66 NEI/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NEI / 100
The assessor was only able to find one version of Sudan’s Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Assets Act of 2010 on the internet…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NEI / 100
As noted in 66A, Sudan’s procurement legislation is unclear and it is not possible to award a score on this basis. As such, this…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
During phone interviews, two experts on Sudan’s defence sector verified that there is a complete failure to investigate or prosecute cases of corruption in…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
A thorough internet search and interviews with two experts on Sudan’s defence sector [1,2] yielded no evidence that individuals who implement procurement in the…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 0/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
A review of Sudan’s Public Procurement Act and the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance did not yield any evidence of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The high level of opacity in the award of Sudan’s defence sector contracts inhibits any efforts that ministries might make, or that civil society…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Since Sudan’s Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance [1,2,3] are not involved in and generally have no visibility into defence sector procurement activities undertaken…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
It is not clear whether breaches of contract are acted upon in Sudan’s defence and security sectors. A review of the websites of the…
Explore
Q68 13/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 25 / 100
According to Transparency International, the Public Grievances Chamber is essentially Sudan’s Ombudsman, established to independently ‘consider complaints related to grievances suffered by citizens in…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 0 / 100
According to Transparency International, the Public Grievances Chamber is essentially Sudan’s Ombudsman, established to independently ‘consider complaints related to grievances suffered by citizens in…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
According to Transparency International, the Public Grievances Chamber is essentially Sudan’s Ombudsman, established to independently ‘consider complaints related to grievances suffered by citizens in…
Explore
Q69 0/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement, Contracting and Disposal of Assets Act of the Republic of Sudan, 2010, allows for the termination of a contract and/or the…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NA / 100
Since procurement officials in defence sector ministries do not have any practical visibility into or authority over defence sector procurements [1,2], these transactions are…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Since procurement officials in defence sector ministries have no practical visibility into or authority over defence sector procurements [1,2], they are not able to…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
A review of Sudan’s Public Procurement Act of 2010 [1] and an interview with an expert on Sudan’s defence sector [2] did not yield…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
A review of Sudan’s Public Procurement Act of 2010 [1] and an interview with an expert on Sudan’s defence sector [2] did not yield…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
A review of Sudan’s Public Procurement Act of 2010 [1] did not yield any evidence that the Government of Sudan has adopted formal policies…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance [1,2,3], as well as an interview with an expert on Sudan’s…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance [1,2,3], as well as an interview with an expert on Sudan’s…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance [1,2,3], as well as an interview with an expert on Sudan’s…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
In separate phone interviews, two experts on Sudan’s security sector verified that single-source offset contracts are not only rarely (if ever) formally justified, they…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence in Sudan’s Procurement Act that the government imposes restrictions on the use of agents and intermediaries during procurement processes in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There are not any known restrictions or public-specific policy on the use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle in the defence sector.…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found, for example, on the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior or Finance [1,2,3], that the Government of Sudan…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. A 2017 report by Chatham House reads that 50% of Sudan’s arms purchases came…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government’s purchasing activity and justification criteria for its purchases have long been completely…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No reliable evidence can be identified to validate whether or not political elites attempt…
Explore