Q20.
Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?
20a. Existence of policing function
Score
SCORE: 75/100
Rubric
Taiwan score: 75/100
Score: 0/100
No policing function is exercised over the defence services to investigate corruption or organised crime.
Score: 50/100
There is a unit within the national police force that deals with organised crime and corruption, which may be authorised to work on issues in the defence sector.
Score: 100/100
There is a unit within the national police force that deals with organised crime and corruption in the defence services, or there is a unit within the military police with the same mandate.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
20b. Independence
Score
SCORE: 75/100
Rubric
Taiwan score: 75/100
Score: 0/100
These policing functions are subject to considerable and regular undue influence from top military officials or the executive.
Score: 50/100
These policing functions are nominally independent, but in practice their work or budgets can be interfered with by top military officials or the executive.
Score: 100/100
These policing functions operate independently of the bodies that they investigate, and their budget is ring-fenced.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
20c. Effectiveness
Score
SCORE: 75/100
Rubric
Taiwan score: 75/100
Score: 0/100
There is a complete failure to investigate or prosecute, even in the face of clear evidence.
Score: 25/100
Cases are superficially investigated, or receive "show" hearings in which defendants are not punished.
Score: 50/100
Cases are investigated but not often prosecuted. There is clear undue influence in the decision making process, or it may be that only certain types of cases are prosecuted.
Score: 75/100
Cases are investigated or prosecuted through formal processes, but undue political influence is attempted, and sometimes effective at derailing prosecutions.
Score: 100/100
Cases are investigated or prosecuted through formal processes and without undue political influence.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 20a. Existence of policing function | 20b. Independence | 20c. Effectiveness |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Algeria | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Angola | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Argentina | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Armenia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Australia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | NEI |
Bahrain | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Bangladesh | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Belgium | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Botswana | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Brazil | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Cameroon | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Canada | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Chile | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
China | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Colombia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Cote d'Ivoire | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Denmark | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Egypt | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Estonia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Finland | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
France | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Germany | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Ghana | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Greece | 50 / 100 | NEI | 50 / 100 |
Hungary | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
India | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Indonesia | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Iran | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Iraq | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Italy | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Japan | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Jordan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Kenya | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Kosovo | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kuwait | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Latvia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Lebanon | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Lithuania | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Malaysia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Mali | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Mexico | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Montenegro | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Morocco | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Myanmar | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Netherlands | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
New Zealand | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Niger | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Nigeria | 75 / 100 | NEI | 50 / 100 |
North Macedonia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | NEI |
Norway | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Oman | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Palestine | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | NEI |
Philippines | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Poland | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Portugal | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Qatar | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Russia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Serbia | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Singapore | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Africa | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
South Korea | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
South Sudan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Spain | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Sudan | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Sweden | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Switzerland | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Taiwan | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Tanzania | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Thailand | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Tunisia | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Turkey | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Uganda | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Ukraine | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
United Kingdom | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
United States | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Venezuela | 0 / 100 | NA | NA |
Zimbabwe | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | NA |