Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

8/100

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The military doctrine of Ukraine is a comprehensive and detailed document which analyses security situation, sets goals and main objectives of the military policy…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The military doctrine of Ukraine is publicly available and can be found both on the website of the President of Ukraine [1] and the…
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no requirement for anti-corruption training for commanders on all levels, although the MoD Anti-corruption Program for 2015-2017 envisaged providing training for heads…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Operations planning of the AFU is regulated by classified MoD orders [1]. However, there was no evidence that the military takes corruption into account.…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
No formal provisions state that corruption is to be taken into account in planning for operations as well as in the execution of operations…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 13/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
The MoD does not deploy any trained personnel for corruption monitoring [1]. However, there is the MoD Main Inspection which is empowered to carry…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
The MoD does not deploy any trained personnel for corruption monitoring [1] and there is no M&E guidance in place [1].
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
The MoD does not deploy any trained personnel for corruption monitoring, and there are no reports on corruption risks related to particular deployments [1],…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 25/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There are no guidelines specific for contracting while deployed on operations. Military procurement in Ukraine can be divided into centralized (carried out by the…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
There is no special staff training on corruption risks in contracting while deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions. However, the MoD Anti-corruption Program provided…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Private military contractors are illegal in Ukraine, although some MPs stated they were going…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. PMCs are illegal in Ukraine. Those businesses which provide training on tactical medicine or…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. PMCs are illegal in Ukraine. Following the Russian aggression, Ukraine not only announced mobilization…
Explore