Procurement Risk:

Moderate

Score:

65.3/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 50/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) [1] and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
The DFARS does not explicitly mention risks of corruption by name however, there are some provisions which cover corruption risks [1]. Part 203 of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
In general, acquisitions are undertaken in accordance with DFARS and FAR as applicable. However, DoD Contract Management is on the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO)…
Explore
Q58 83/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The procurement cycle is divided into three processes: the defence acquisition process, the JCIDS process (as outlined in Q11) and the PPBE process (as…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
All the legislation, guidance and instructions outlined in 58A are publicly available. The ‘Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework’ provides a list of references,…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
For each of the acquisition pathways outlined in the ‘Adaptive Acquisition Framework’, there are detailed procedures for each of the phases [1]. For example,…
Explore
Q59 58/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
Various bodies, both internal and external, perform oversight of DoD acquisitions. The internal bodies are the DoD Defence Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The DoD IG has 237 open recommendations regarding acquisition programmes, which suggests a fairly active oversight function [1]. The fact that these recommendations remain…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The vast majority of GAO and DoD OIG reports relating to defence acquisitions are published publicly on their websites. This includes reviews and reports…
Explore
Q60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
Procurement is undertaken via the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution process. The planning phase produces the Defense Planning Guidance (DPG), which draws from the…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 50 / 100
The Future Years Defence Plan (FYDP) is a congressionally mandated annual requirement from the Secretary of Defense [1], which outlines the estimated expenditures and…
Explore
Q61 88/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
Information on all unclassified contracts over the minimum purchase threshold ($10,000) is published on the beta.SAM.gov website (previously the Federal Procurement Data System). This…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 100 / 100
The beta.SAM.gov website allows users to produce a variety of reports and datasets relating to contract awards. Once a user account is created, members…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 88/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 100 / 100
The FAR prescribes that the clause ‘Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct’ should be inserted in solicitations and contracts if the value of…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 75 / 100
It is hard to assess the implementation of these policies, however, the Defence Companies Index on Anti-Corruption and Corporate Transparency (DCI), produced by TI…
Explore
Q63 50/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the process by which the DoD identifies, assesses and prioritises the capabilities required by the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) oversees all joint capability documents internally. As with most functions of the DoD, they are occasionally audited by…
Explore
Purchases Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as the strategic documents are not made public. As outlined in 63B, there is widespread…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 50/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 50 / 100
Between 2015 and 2019, 53.7% of contract dollars awarded by defence agencies were awarded competitively [1]. The GAO undertakes an annual assessment of the…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 50 / 100
According to the DFARS, the DoD is prohibited from entering into contracts on the basis of an unsolicited proposal without full and open competition,…
Explore
Q65 25/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
Most of the ethical conduct regulations on procurement focus on relations with the contractor. The Procurement Integrity Act outlines regulations with regard to safeguarding…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
According to Steven Aftergood, the DFARS does leave an audit trail which is helpful to auditors and investigators [1]. There is no evidence of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Outside of the Procurement Integrity Act, and the standards of conduct outlined in the FAR [1,2], there is no further evidence of specific tender…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As outlined in Q11, the Joint Capability Integration & Development System (JCIDS) is the process used for identifying and prioritising military capability requirements. It…
Explore
Q66 88/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
The issue of collusion within procurement is addressed within legislation on ‘antitrust’, which works to ‘prohibit business practices that unreasonably deprive consumers of the…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Subpart 3.3 of the FAR regulates antitrust violations. If there is evidence of a violation of antitrust laws within bids or proposals, the contracting…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
An FOIA request made in 2019 by Steven Aftergood revealed that, between 2013 and 2017, there were 1,059 criminal cases of defence contracting fraud,…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
The Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF) organises training with the DoD Inspector General for procurement officials at all levels. The purpose of this training…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 58/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 75 / 100
The Defense Contract Management Agency has a number of policies on managing contractors, most of which are guided by the ‘Contract Maintenance’ instruction [1].…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Full contracts are not published in either their original or modified state, and any excerpts from a modified contract are also not published. Information…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
In 2017, the DoD Inspector General released a summary of a series of reports assessing how effectively the DoD tracks the performance of its…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator.Very little data on the enforcement of sanctions due to breaches of contract could be found…
Explore
Q68 100/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The Contractor Disclosure Program enables contractors to report violations of criminal law and violations of the civil False Claims Act [1]. The DoD Inspector…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 100 / 100
The Contractor Disclosure Program is free of charge and consists only of a form that can be emailed or posted once completed. It is…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
It has been difficult to accurately assess this indicator. In 2008, Boeing challenged the government’s decision to award Northrup Grumman and EADS a $35…
Explore
Q69 92/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Under the FAR Subpart 3.7, ‘Voiding and Rescinding Contracts’, the heads of executive agencies are empowered to declare void and rescind contracts if there…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of undue political influence. The cases outlined in the DoD IG Semiannual Reports to Congress suggest that the formal process…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 75 / 100
The DoD IG Semiannual Report to Congress contains a section on DCIS investigations, under which public corruption and procurement fraud fall, and this includes…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 100/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
With regard to offsets in defence trade, the 1992 Amendments to the 1950 Defence Production Act states that offsets are ‘economically inefficient and trade…
Explore
Due diligence Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1]. However, there is…
Explore
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1].
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1].
Explore
Monitoring Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1].
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1].
Explore
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the United States prohibits any federal agency from entering into any offset agreement [1].
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NEI/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
Part 129 of the Code of Federal Regulations concerns the registration and licensing of brokers [1]. It provides that agents (“persons engaged in brokering”)…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The Commerce Department does not collect key information on agents before approving arms deals [1].…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
For major weapons systems, which are capital intensive and take a long time to produce, contract financing is used by the DoD to support…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. A review of the SIPRI arms transfer database shows that the United States imported…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. While the US has a formalised and effective process for defence procurement, justification for…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Domestic acquisitions are heavily influenced by the defence industry, as well as government officials,…
Explore