Personnel Risk:

Low

Score:

76.7/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 17/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 50 / 100
The Standards of Conduct Office within the DoD publishes statements from the Secretaries of Defense relating to integrity [1]. Under the Trump administration (which…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 0 / 100
No public statements could be found on the issue of anti-corruption or ethics and integrity, which covers the research period of this index (2015-2020)…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 0 / 100
No publicly available unit-level communications could be found.
Explore
Q35 100/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Bribery is criminalised under Title 18 of the US Code [1], which applies to all public officials (including employees of any department, agency or…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
There do not seem to be any statistics published on the number of corruption or bribery cases investigated by the DCIS, however, the annual…
Explore
Q36 58/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 50 / 100
The ‘Military Whistleblower Protection Act’ of 1988 is the main legislation on whistleblowing in the military, which was subsequently broadened and strengthened by the…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 75 / 100
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General is mandated to detect and deter fraud, waste and abuse in the DoD [1] and, as…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
As mentioned, the GAO 2019 report on the DoD’s handling of whistleblower confidentiality deemed that the DoDIG did not have sufficient mechanisms in place…
Explore
Q37 75/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 100 / 100
The Office of Personnel Management runs the ‘Position Designation Automated Tool’ (PDT), which establishes risk levels for positions where the duties and responsibilities may…
Explore
Selection process Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Although it is assumed that more stringent vetting processes would take place, no clear policy…
Explore
Oversight Score: 50 / 100
The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCAS) undertakes investigations to determine suitability for positions, but the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is the Suitability…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 92/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
The number of military and civilian personnel permanently assigned to the DoD is updated on a quarterly basis and can be found on the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Department of Defense releases monthly data on active-duty personnel by rank/grade. This data is broken down by service and rank, including cadets. It…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
There have been no recorded instances of ghost soldiers in the US military in the past five years, according to a media search.
Explore
Q39 75/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 75 / 100
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), which provides the payment services of the DoD, produces annual tables for active and reserve military personnel…
Explore
Allowances Score: 75 / 100
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and the Military Compensation websites both provide details on the allowances that military personnel can receive [1,2].…
Explore
Q40 83/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
There have been no recorded instances of pay being delayed in the last five years. However, there have been a number of cases of…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
There have been a few cases of improper pay. For example, in 2016, the DoD demanded that the California National Guard soldiers who served…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Pay tables are published annually, detailing salaries disaggregated by rank [1]. The Defence Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) also publishes allowance tables, which are…
Explore
Q41 67/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
With regard to top management, the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are appointed by the President, with the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The top management positions mentioned above are selected by the President with the consent of the Senate [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. There is no evidence that process…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Given that top management roles are nominated by the President first before going through congressional hearings, information on the nomination is made public through…
Explore
Q42 75/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 75 / 100
The General Military Law outlines the requirements necessary for certain promotions, such as time in previous post [1,2]. If the promotion is competitive, selection…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 50 / 100
With regard to exceptions to promotions, there are two considerations. First, the U.S. Army authorises battlefield promotions in designated combat areas for sergeants and…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
In the case of the Navy, promotions to grade of Captain, Commander, Lieutenant Commander, Lieutenant and Chief Warrant Officers are published. These publications include…
Explore
Frequency Score: 100 / 100
In the case of the Army, the portal ‘My Board File’ is updated on a weekly basis and provides information 60 days in advance…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
The US military has been volunteer-based since 1973, when the military draft stopped being used as a system of recruitment. The government, however, maintains…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as compulsory conscription does not occur.
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as compulsory conscription does not occur.
Explore
Q44 92/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 75 / 100
According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, any person who procures their enlistment or appointment in the armed forces through false representation shall…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Uniform Code of Military Justice does not specify sanctions, leaving it to the discretion of the court-martial [1,2]. As outlined in 44A, the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The Criminal Investigations record published by the DoD Inspector General includes details of charges against defence personnel relating to bribery and other offences. In…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
Civilian and military pay is disbursed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), which is separate from the chain of command [1]. The…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 100/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
The DoD Joint Ethics Regulation and ‘Standards of Conduct’ are applicable to all DoD civilian employees; any active duty regular or reserve military officer;…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Joint Ethics Regulation and Standards of Ethical Conduct are publicly available [1,2]. Each new employee, in addition to their training as outlined in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
The ‘Standards of Conduct’ outline the penalties and sanctions for violating the rules prescribed [1]. There is no available information regarding the extent of…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Within 90 days of entering on duty for new DoD employees and within 180 days of entering active duty for enlisted members of the…
Explore
Q47 100/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
The Office of Government Ethics oversees the ethics programme for the executive branch, with a specific focus on financial conflicts of interest [1]. All…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Standards of Ethical Conduct is publicly available [1]. Each new employee must receive, in addition to their training as outlined in 47D, the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. If the Director of OGE becomes concerned about violations of noncriminal government ethics law or…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Each new employee of the executive branch who is subject to the Standards of Conduct must complete initial ethics training within 3 months of…
Explore
Q48 50/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The DoD’s Joint Ethics Regulation (JER) guides and regulates all the US joint ethics training programmes [1]. The JER require that all DoD employees,…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
The JER require that all DoD employees, including both civilian and military personnel, receive annual ethics training (11-200), although only one hour of training…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: NA / 100
It remains unclear to what extent anti-corruption is covered in the DoD’s more general ethics and fraud, waste and abuse training. Nevertheless, aside from…
Explore
Q49 67/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 25 / 100
During the research period of 2015-2020, there was no policy which mandated the various military justice systems to publish details on the prosecution of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
As noted above, each of the branches of the military makes details relating to courts-martial of their own service members public independently. It appears…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Given the lengthy dockets and reports published by each of the armed services, as outlined above, it seems that prosecutions are frequent. With regard…
Explore
Q50 NEI/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) makes an exception for facilitation payments, in which companies can make facilitation payments to foreign officials for ‘routine…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. As noted in 35B, there are no publicly available statistics on the enforcement of anti-bribery…
Explore
Prevalence Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator; very little data regarding the prevalence of facilitation payments exists. Given their nature, it seems…
Explore