Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

58/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 58/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia [1] outlines the establishment of the standing committees at the National Assembly to perform…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The separation of powers provided by the Constitution is duly in place to prevent any coercive measures towards the legislative. In addition to the…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Clause 8 of Article 15 of the Law on Defence [1] states that the armed forces should, by all means, stay neutral in political…
Explore
Q2 21/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Chapter 5 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly is dedicated to the standing committees of the parliament. Articles 10-15 refer to…
Explore
Expertise Score: 25 / 100
During the former government’s time in power, only five MPs had extensive experience in the field of defence and security in the Standing Committee…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 25 / 100
All major defence and security documents pass through hearings and approval/disapproval at the National Assembly. Thus, the National Security Strategy, that was adopted in…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The Constitution of Armenia provides more oversight of the National Assembly (NA) over the executive (Articles 110 and 111 refer to the oversight over…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
Standing Committees do not investigate cases. They may commission an investigation that is conducted by the Audit Chamber. The Law on Audit Chamber details…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The Committee is in place, but there is no data backing up the incorporation of the recommendations into the activities of ministries.
Explore
Q3 75/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 100 / 100
The new National Security Strategy has been adopted in July 2020. As part of the development of the new strategy, the Security Council met…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
On July 26, 2019, the National Security Secretary held a press conference, stressing the importance of “multifunctional discussions of professional, expert, civil, political and…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 75 / 100
After April 2016, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the government was under heavy pressure to review and revisit its defence strategy. The allegations…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The public can access information on proposed law drafts and initiatives through a common portal [1]. This portal allows the public to engage in…
Explore
Q4 75/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence of Armenia (MoD) provides a comprehensive Concept on Public Awareness stressing the importance and outlining the scope of public consultations…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
The Law on NGOs, which was introduced in 2017, regulates the activities of CSOs and provides state guarantees for their operations. Article 9 of…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 75 / 100
Public officials would not work specifically with CSOs on corruption issues, but they would not avoid working and communicating with CSOs and discuss corruption…
Explore
Q5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Article 5 of the Constitution of Armenia [1] states that generally accepted rules of international law and international conventions, once they have been ratified…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
The Mechanisms for the Review of Implementation of the Convention have been established to assists states in implementing the convention. A comprehensive self-assessment and…
Explore
Q6 75/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
Transparency International Anti-Corruption Center periodically brings defence-related issues to public attention. A penal of experts gather to discuss issues within the defence sector and…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
The government periodically organizes public debates and discussions on defence-related issues. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) initiated a range of discussions to present new…
Explore
Q7 88/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
After the revolution, in 2019 the Government adopted a new Anticorruption Strategy and Its Implementation Plan for 2019-2022. [1] Tհese documents do not contain…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) Human Rights and Integrity Center has been established to build integrity and address corruptions issues within the ministry.[1] Through…
Explore
Q8 75/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) Human Rights and Integrity Centre was established to ensure human rights and strengthening integrity (anti-corruption behaviour inclusive) within the…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
The Human Rights and Integrity Centre of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) of the Republic of Armenia has been operating since 2015. It is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Human Rights and Integrity Centre addresses operational evaluation concerning the human right abuses in the defence sector, it may provide methodological intervention and…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There has traditionally been a very high rate of trust towards the military in…
Explore
Q10 75/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) Human Rights and Integrity Centre was established to ensure human rights and strengthening integrity (anti-corruption behaviour inclusive) within MoD.…
Explore
Regularity Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. During the management process, the Internal Audit Department of the MoD performs risk management following…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. Corruption risk analysis conducted by the Human Rights and Integrity Centre seems to be used…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 33/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
The basis for the procurement planning process is the Development Plan of the Armed Forces for 2019-2024 approved by the long-term program and the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The search did not identify any source for public awareness of acquisition planning. The main acquisition bulletin, www. procurement.am, provides data on acquisition plans…
Explore
External oversight Score: 25 / 100
Both the Audit Chamber and the State Supervision Service can exercise control over the observance of the procedures operating in the RA Ministry of…
Explore
Q12 88/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The parliament approves the general budget submitted by the government. The defence budget makes an integral part of the general budget and undergoes the…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The government’s Rules of Procedure and the Law on Budgetary System requires the government to submit the budgets for the parliament’s approval at least…
Explore
Q13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
There is a rather well-resourced and established Standing Committee at the National Assembly that deals with the defence and security-related issues, including budget discussions…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Standing Committee on Defence, National Security and Internal Affairs has previously had the right to come up with suggestions and revisions on the…
Explore
Q14 33/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The defence budget makes an integral part of the general budget and undergoes the same procedure as the general budget. Once the budget is…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Though the majority of defence budget items are not disclosed to the public, there are mechanisms provided by law to oversee the spending. Thus,…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
The only source for this sub-question is a brief explanation by the Interviewee 5 who submitted a request for quarterly budget implementation and got…
Explore
Q15 67/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Some of the sources other than from central budget are being made transparent and accountable through different regulations. In 26 April 2018, the Government…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The defence budget of the Republic of Armenia is compiled following Article 21, clause 1 of the Law on the Budgetary System of the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Interviewee 5 agreed that the budget issues are within the focus of the CSOs and media, but efforts are not enough to thoroughly scrutinize…
Explore
Q16 50/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The Internal Audit Department is an independent separate entity within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) that ensures the implementation of audit in all divisions…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 25 / 100
The internal audit reports are not submitted to any other institution for oversight of sensitive issues. The Parliament gets the executive summaries at the…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Legally, the Audit Chamber and Authorized Body oversee the MoD Internal Audit activities [1]. The Internal Audit Department was reviewed by the then Control…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The MoD regularly addresses the findings of the internal audit through overseeing the activity reports by those divisions where the audit was conducted. The…
Explore
Q17 81/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The Audit Chamber and Authorized Body are authorized to conduct an audit in all state agencies that are financed through the state budget. In…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
In carrying out its functions, according to the Law on the Audit Chamber, the Audit Chamber shall be independent of the bodies and organizations…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Perhaps because of the changes happening in regards the switching from the oversight to the auditing functions (the Control Chamber became the Audit Chamber…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The ministry addresses the findings of the external audit, as they have to report back on the measure and activities undertaken to eliminate the…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Currently, there is no evidence that Armenia’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation [1].…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Currently, there is no evidence that Armenia’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation [1].…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence that individual defence personnel have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation [1]. According…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. There is no evidence that Armenia’s defence institutions or personnel have controlling or financial interests in businesses…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable. There is no evidence that Armenia’s defence institutions or personnel have controlling or financial interests in businesses…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 63/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 75 / 100
The likelihood that organized crime penetrates the defence sector is very low. At the time the armed forces developed in Armenia in the late…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
The government actively looks for signs of criminal behaviour in the defence and security sector. This sphere is sensitive, and the authorizations have always…
Explore
Q20 75/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
Generally, the Police of the Republic of Armenia is authorized to combat organized crime in the country. Simultaneously, the Military Police (MP) of the…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Military Police is an agency within the MoD (Article 1 of the Law on Military Police) that operates through the state budget (Article…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
According to the procedures, the MP functions well and investigates cases under its scope [1]. However, the information is scarce to judge whether there…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 25/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia [1] outlines the establishment of the standing committees at the National Assembly to perform…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
The designated Standing Committee has the right to request classified information containing state, service and trade secret or any other secret provided by laws.…
Explore
Q22 25/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 25 / 100
The selection of the senior position of the intelligence service is regulated with a range of laws that outline the profile of an individual…
Explore
Selection bias Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Due to the classified nature of the intelligence services, it is difficult to confirm or…
Explore
Vetting process Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. It is worth noring that no vetting process by an external body is anticipated by…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 50/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
Armenia is not a signatory to the Arms Trade Treaty [1].
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable because Armenia has not signed the ATT.
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Armenia is not a significant arms export country. However, whenever the opportunity presents itself, the issue is debated at the joint meeting of the…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no regulation of lobbying activities in Armenia at all. [1]
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
There is no regulation of lobbying activities in Armenia at all. [1]
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
There is no regulation of lobbying activities in Armenia at all. [1]
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no regulation of lobbying activities in Armenia at all. [1]
Explore