Political Risk:

Low

Score:

78/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 100/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The shape of Danish Defence and the country’s overall defence policy is laid out by a political agreement (Defence Agreement) [1]. The defence agreement…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
Parliament regularly discuss and approve laws on defence, including the yearly budget (as in the state budget negotiations) and major procurements. The Supplemental Agreement…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
No instances of undue influence on parliament by either the military or executive could be found [1].
Explore
Q2 85/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
There is a defence committee within the Danish parliament (Forsvarsudvalget). The Defence Committee deals with all aspects of Danish defence, including emergency management, and…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
According to the Standing Orders of the Danish Parliament, there is no requirement that committee members possess expertise or special knowledge on the committee…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
The Defence Committee reviews issues on defence on a regular basis. There is no evidence that the committee is confined, entitled or bound to…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Defence Committee meets regularly once a week and on ad hoc basis when issues occur. It regularly considers motions and bills and proposes…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
There is no evidence that the Defence Committee conducted any long-term investigations between 2015-2020 [1]. However, by law, it is the prerogative of the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence that the Defence Committee issues recommendations. There are no formal obligations to do…
Explore
Q3 94/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 100 / 100
There is evidence that ministers and policymakers participate in the public debate specifically about defence policy and security strategy: for instance, the incumbent Defence…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 100 / 100
The defence policy, as laid out in the “Defence Agreement”, is reached by political agreement. As such, all parameters of the defence policy are…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 75 / 100
The Defence Committee conducts public hearings on issues relevant to the defence policy, but not specifically on the Defence Agreement. However, these hearings are…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Danish white paper on foreign and security policy (formulated by the incumbent government) and the Defence Agreement are avaible online along with different…
Explore
Q4 50/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of formal or informal policies that require openness towards CSOs [1].
Explore
CSO protections Score: 100 / 100
There is no specific law governing CSOs in Denmark, but the Danish Constitution ensures the right to form associations and organisations, and these cannot…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
As stated in the 2015 TI-GDII assessment, inclusion of CSOs in governmental work is based on traditions and norms and not on formal requirements…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Denmark has signed and ratified the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions [1] as well as the…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
In a 2015 review, OECD found that full implementation and enforcement of the OECD convention was incomplete [1]. Similarly in 2015, the United Nations…
Explore
Q6 100/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
There is a sustained and engaged public debate about defence issues. As indicated in Q3, the debate takes place within a variety of forums,…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 100 / 100
The government engages regularly in public debate about defence issues. The Minister of Defence often participates in conferences and seminars organised by think tanks,…
Explore
Q7 63/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
The Danish Penal Code also applies to employees (miliatry and civilian) in the Danish defence sector. The penal code criminalizes bribery and contains a…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 25 / 100
Research did not identify a specific action plan to foster effective implementation of the national anti-corruption legislation. However, in light of recent cases, the…
Explore
Q8 58/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
As the independent military prosecutor, The Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service (Forsvarets Auditørkorps) deals with all violations of the military and civil penal…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service is an independent service and does not form part of the military chain of command. The service…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
There are indications that attention is given to maintaining a highly skilled staff. For instance, The Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service has focused…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Denmark scores highly on Transparency International’s annual survey on corruption perception [1]. However, there…
Explore
Q10 75/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 75 / 100
Research indicates that the Defence Internal Audit Office identify such risks as part of their auditing of the Defence [1]. Namely, the MoD internal…
Explore
Regularity Score: 100 / 100
The MoD internal auditing office compiles on a yearly basis an audit plan. The audit plan comprises the basis of a systematic risk assessment.…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
There is evidence to suggest that risk assessment findings are not incorporated into policy or practice on a regular basis. This is first and…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 92/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
There is a clear process for the acquisition planning cycle [1] and internal functions within the Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Information about the acquisition process, tenders, forthcoming equipment, planned investments and so on is available on the DALO website [1]. However, description on processes…
Explore
External oversight Score: 100 / 100
As The Ministry of Defence Internal Audit Office and The Danish National Audit Office audits the Defence, these offices also function as an oversight…
Explore
Q12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The defence budget is transparent as it is contained in the Finance Act (Finansloven). It contains comprehensive and disaggregated information on expenditure across all…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The defence budget is contained in the Finance Act which is negotiated in Parliament each year. By law, the proposal for the Finance Act…
Explore
Q13 88/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
As the Finance Act (and thereby the defence budget) is subject to parliamentary negotiation each year, Parliament and its members scrutinise the defence budget…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 75 / 100
As the Finance Act (and thereby the defence budget) is subject to parliamentary negotiation each year, the budget is fixed for one year at…
Explore
Q14 100/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 100 / 100
As a part of the Finance Act, the defence budget is made publicly available online and in print [1]. As noted in Q12, it…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
As noted in Q12 and Q14A, the defence budget is fully disclosed and contains comprehensive and disaggregated information on expenditure across all functions. Comments…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 100 / 100
According to the Public Information Act (“Offentlighedsloven”), all actors within society can obtain information on the defence budget. However, restrictions on the grounds of…
Explore
Q15 83/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Other sources of defence income are published in two sources: the annual reports of the Defence Command and the the defence budget as in…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence Internal Audit Office and the Danish National Audit Office scrutinise the accounts of the Ministry of Defence (including Defence Command)…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There are some indications that media and civil society is concerned with/about Defence equipment sales and property disposals when these occur. Some members of…
Explore
Q16 44/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
The Defence Internal Audit Office reviews the accounts of the entire domain of the Ministry of Defence (including all underlying agencies (“styrelser”) such as…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 50 / 100
Reviewing the governance paper of the Defence Internal Audit Office, there are not stipulations to dictate that the Defence Internal Audit report to a…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Internal audit reports are not made public and no evidence suggest that internal audit reports are pro-actively released to legitimate external audit bodies [1].…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
As mentioned several times (see Q8, Q16A), research indicates a potential high degree of effectiveness of the audit: The office regularly identifies critical errors…
Explore
Q17 88/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The Danish National Audit Office (Rigsrevisionen) carries out the annual financial audit of the government accounts as well as ad hoc studies, investigations and…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Danish National Audit Office is governed by legislation (The Auditor General Act) which, among other things, guarantees its independence [1]. The office is…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Audit reports (“beretninger”) and comments (“notater”) are released to the public and they are available on the DNAO website when the meeting of the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
There is evidence that the Ministry of Defence address audit findings in its practices. For instance, the Danish National Audit Office publish comments on…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no law that prohibits Defence institutions’ association with natural resource exploitation.The exploitation of the country’s natural resources is regulated by the law…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Research found no evidence of the defence institutions being involved in business related to the country’s natural resource exploitation [1, 2]. The only instances…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Research shows no indications of active defence personnel being involved in business relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation. However, a test sample showed…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no evidence that Denmark’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 100/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
The Danish Defence Intelligence Service is tasked with identifying threats against the activities and infrastructure of the Defence, both nationally and internationally. This specifically…
Explore
Government response Score: 100 / 100
By way of the Danish Defence Intelligence Service’s intelligence briefings and publications, the government must be said to be aware of the threat/possibility of…
Explore
Q20 100/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service has the prosecuting authority of all cases of violation of the civil and military penal code. Cases…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service is an independent authority under the Ministry of Defence. It is independent from the Defence and the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The cases of the Ministry of Defence Military Prosecution Service are investigated and/or prosecuted through formal procedures [1]. The cases are investigated by the…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 75/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Danish Defence Intelligence Service is subject to scrutiny and oversight on three different fronts that are all independent: 1) As the DDIS is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
It is difficult to assess the effectiveness of the oversight mechanisms of the DDIS, since most information about the intelligence services is classified. The…
Explore
Q22 100/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 100 / 100
According to law, all positions in the public sector have to be publicly advertised [1, 2]. Some exceptions are written into law, but there…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 100 / 100
According to the DDIS information page on the selection of candidates, all applications are subject to a number of practical, theoretical and psychological tests…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 100 / 100
Since all employees in the DDIS are required to pass and maintain a security clearance, the hiring panel must possess one themselves [1]. Spouses/live-in…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 58/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Denmark signed and ratified the Arms Trade Treaty on 02 April 2014 [1, 2].
Explore
Compliance Score: 75 / 100
The Minister of Justice provides licences for the production and export of arms and war materials [1, 2]. As an EU member, Denmark subscribes…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Denmark does export arms and military equipment [1, 2]. Research found no indications that upcoming arms exports are subject to parliamentary approval or oversight.…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no regulation or legislation on lobbying in Denmark, neither generally or specifically covering the defence institutions [1]. From time to time this…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as the country does not have legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore