Operational Risk:

Very High

Score:

30/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Denmark Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
There is no Danish doctrine on corruption issues. This was confirmed by sources [1, 2]. As Denmark deploys troops within the framework of NATO,…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as the country has no military doctrine that considers corruption a strategic issue for operations.
Explore
Q52 50/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
As there is no doctrine on corruption issues, there is no training of commanders at all levels. This was confirmed by a source [1].…
Explore
Q53 63/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 75 / 100
Research indicates that corruption as a strategic issue is taken into account in the forward planning of operations in relevant missions and to some…
Explore
Application Score: 50 / 100
As mentioned above (Q53A), Danish military engagements are usually conducted as part of a NATO mission. Hence, the Danish contribution is a very small…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 8/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Research indicates that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs monitors corruption concerning civilian activities and aids [1, 2, 3]. However, this is only relevant as…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
As research could not identify montoring practices, research was also unable to identify M&E guidance. No further information on the Ministry of Defence Accounting…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption monitoring reports are made public. No further information on the Ministry of Defence Accounting Agency’s activities in relation…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 NEI/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator, as Danish forces do not perform contract activities during missions. Research found no indications that…
Explore
Training Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator, as Danish forces do not perform contract activities during missions. Research found no indications that…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Denmark does not have legislation or clear policies regulating or forbidding the use of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The country has no policies or laws on the use of PMCs.
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The country has no policies or laws on the use of PMCs.
Explore