Procurement Risk:

Moderate

Score:

62/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 63/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. As part of the implementation of the report of the Group of Ministers on…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
In order to mitigate corruption risks, ensure transparency, accountability and probity in defence procurement, the following steps have been taken in the DPP-2016: The…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Defence purchases are generally to be procured in accordance with the DPP-2016 [1]. Procurement must conform to the Canons of Financial Propriety under Rule…
Explore
Q58 67/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
India’s Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) is formalised and publicly available in a 489 page document on the Ministry of Defence (MoD) website [1]. The…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Procurement procedures and guidelines are publicly disclosed [1][2]. Information is publicly available regarding assessment of needs [3]. Procurement tenders for departments with autonomous procurement…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
Procurement procedures and guidelines are publicly disclosed [1][2]. Given the secrecy of the MoD however, it is difficult to guarantee that the DPP is…
Explore
Q59 75/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The DPP-2016 states that the acquisition process for the five categories of procurement under the ‘Buy’ and ‘Buy & Make’ schemes will involve the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Procurement oversight mechanisms are robustly active. They engage in demanding explanations, issuing recommendations or conclusions that are being followed or implemented [1][2][3].
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
There is evidence of active oversight activity by way of reports, announcements in the press of the cancellation of procurement programmes and the release…
Explore
Q60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
The process of defence acquisition in India is based on the fifteen years Long Term Integrated Perspective Plan (LTIPP), five years Services Capital Acquisition…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
Notice of planned purchases is subjective and depends on the specific defence purchase. High-profile defence purchases are made public by the media, prior to…
Explore
Q61 25/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Actual defence purchases are made public through an official press release by the Government of India’s Press Information Bureau; some strategic purchases are not…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data on tenders is available online. Non-sensitive defence tenders are published on the government’s Defence eProcurement Portal and the Indian Army provides information on…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
Bidders and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) need to sign an Integrity Pact committing to not offering or accepting bribes, ensuring integrity in public…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
There is some evidence that the procedures outlined above are implemented. The government endeavours to ensure procedures will demonstrate the highest degree of probity…
Explore
Q63 50/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
India currently does not have a public National Security Strategy [1]. This document is reported to be under review within government. The IISS Military…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
As alluded to in Q.59, scrutiny is conducted actively by a number of legally or constitutionally mandated oversight mechanisms such as CAG and the…
Explore
Purchases Score: 75 / 100
Overall, the MoD seems to base their major purchases on identified requirements on the basis of LTIPP, SCAP and AAPs. “The idea of the…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator, as the proportion of defence procurement conducted as open competition cannot be ascertained. The Defence…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 50 / 100
Single-source defence procurement statistics are not readily available. However, as noted in indicator 64A, the government has stated on record recently that 40% of…
Explore
Q65 69/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 75 / 100
Officials with a role in designing tender specification, or in tender board decisions, are subject to clear regulations and codes of conduct that are…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
Tender boards are subject to regular auditing by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) conducts regular review meetings and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Tender board regulations, codes of conduct and procedures seem to be fully transparent [1][2][3][4].
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Tender boards are subject to regular auditing by CAG. The CVC conducts regular review meetings and conducts a technical examination of public procurement. It…
Explore
Q66 50/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
A legal framework is in place that discourages collusion in the defence sector, primarily the Competition Act, 2002 [1]. The Competition Commission of India…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The CCI can grant a temporary injunction restraining parties from violating the Competition Act, 2002. Under Section 27 of the Act, the CCI can…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
Evidence of enforcement in other sectors exists but there is no evidence of collusion in defence sector bidding and the prosecution of such activities…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The CCI’S “Diagnostic Tool – Towards Competitive Tenders” provides guidance on procurement and identifying collusion practices and competition issues; it further encourages procurement officers…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 56/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
The DPP-2016 lays out procedures for contract and post-contract management. The concerned Service Head Quarter (SHQ) is entrusted with contract management and administration. The…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
There is not much information publicly available pertaining to contract failures and modifications. There are a few reports in the media such as the…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
There are elements of monitoring. The Acquisition Wing submits quarterly Contract Implementation Reports (CIR) to the DPB [1]. The MoD at any stage/tier of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
There is strong evidence of enforcement in cases of corrupt practices and failure to meet offset obligations [1][2]. The deficiency seems to lay in…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Different mechanisms exist for cases which fall inside of delegated powers of SHQs/IDS/CGHQ and those that fall outside of delegated powers. A vendor, having…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
The mechanisms seem to be accessible and cost effective. A vendor is required to file a complaint within two weeks, leaving a short window.…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 75 / 100
Under Section VI (23) of the guidelines for handling complaints in DPP, protection will be given to whistleblowers as per CVC guidelines [1]. As…
Explore
Q69 75/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
There is no comprehensive central legislation which exclusively covers public procurement in the defence and security sector. Offending suppliers are punishable primarily under the…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 75 / 100
In the past, there is evidence of undue political influence, notably in the Bofors scandal where the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was implicated.…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There is evidence that sanctions have been recently applied such as suspension and banning. As of 2018, six firms were debarred from further business…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 75/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Offset contracts are permitted and regulated by legislation. The government conducts due diligence on contractors and third parties during offset contract negotiations as per…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 100 / 100
The government conducts due diligence on contractors and third parties during offset contract negotiations as per the DPP. The general terms and clauses of…
Explore
Q71 69/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
India’s Defence Offset Policy primary objective is to leverage the capital acquisitions to develop India’s defence industry. It aims to do this through encouraging…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Information on offset projects can be found in Standing Committee on Defence reports and CAG reports/press releases. Some information is made public in the…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
CAG had observed from 2007-2011 that there were deficiencies in management of offsets. These included invalid selection of IOPs, zero value addition by the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
There is evidence suggesting that there is robust enforcement. In February 2018, the MoD informed the Standing Committee on Defence that out of 42…
Explore
Q72 50/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
India’s offset policy has centered on the nation’s core defence objective of promoting indigenisation to achieve self-reliance. It was created to reduce the level…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 75/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
Historically, the ‘dalal’ or broker has been an integral part of business dealings for time immemorial in the subcontinent. In recent times, India has…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The DPP-2016 guidelines clarifying the nature and use of agents, brings better transparency and probity in defence dealings. Violations of the guidelines would lead…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 75/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 75 / 100
Elements of the principle aspects of the financing package surrounding arms deals are publicly available prior to the fulfilment of contracts. These are primarily…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. In the past, Cold War ties could have played a role in India’s decision-making.…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government usually cites a justifiable military need for purchases and from particular supplier,…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. According to experts, this requires a case-by-case analysis. For example, with the controversy over…
Explore