Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

53/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 67/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
Parliament has the right to employ formal mechanisms to conduct scrutiny over defence policy. India has a Committee System; and two Committees scrutinise defence…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Parliament debates or reviews defence policy and attempts to influence policy through formal mechanisms. The Standing Committee on Defence puts forth recommendations, however there…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
Ministers are not permitted to be part of any Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) [1]. As the recommendations from the Standing Committee on Defence…
Explore
Q2 88/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
As described in Q.1, there is a Standing Committee on Defence (SCoD). The Committee has the power to scrutinise any aspect of performance of…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
The Standing Committee on Defence consists of elected members from both Houses, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The Chairman of the Committee…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
The Committee analyses budget allocations, policy documents, annual MoD reports; and examines bills referred to the Committee [1]. The Standing Committee on Defence is…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Committee issues recommendations on a regular basis and requires the government to respond within a suitable timeframe [1]. The Minister concerned makes a…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Committee looks at areas such as procurement on a rolling-basis thus providing long-term oversight. It can appoint sub-committees and study groups to make…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 75 / 100
In the March, 2018 report by the Standing Committee on Defence, 34 observations/recommendations were given [1][2]. The government accepted 20 of these. Scrutiny of…
Explore
Q3 38/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
India has displayed a preference for strategic restraint since Independence in 1947. The country adopted a policy of Non-Alignment during Jawaharlal Nehru’s tenure as…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
As there is no well-defined defence policy or strategy, the scope of informal public debate centers on major threats, defence procurement and defence spending…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
India has no formal consultation process involving the general public. The MoD has engaged in consultations with the Indian defence industry regarding procurement and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
As there is no well-defined defence policy or strategy, there is not a lot of information outlining these areas. This does not seem to…
Explore
Q4 33/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 25 / 100
Today, India has more than 3 million Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) [1]. The current government has taken to the digital sphere and created a…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
India has a vibrant civil society and CSOs are allowed to operate without interference from the government. There has been criticism lately that the…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
There is no evidence suggesting CSOs’ requests to work with the government have been denied. There seems to be no specific formal government policy…
Explore
Q5 88/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
India is a signatory to United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and ratified it in May 2011 [1][2][3]. India has been actively participating in…
Explore
Compliance Score: 75 / 100
In July 2018, the government passed the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, which amended and brought significant changes to the Prevention of Corruption…
Explore
Q6 100/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
There is robust regular public debate among academics, journalists, opinion-formers, and CSOs about defence issues [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. High priority issues are discussed with continuity through…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 100 / 100
The government engages in regular discussion with the public about defence issues through media briefings, public forums, in-studio live television interviews on multiple television…
Explore
Q7 88/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
The current government’s election success of 2014 was centred on bringing greater transparency in governance and combating corruption in all sectors including defence. Prime…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 75 / 100
One can conclude from above, that the government is robustly addressing corruption at the Centre, encompassing defence. From the significant changes to the Prevention…
Explore
Q8 58/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
There are no defence and security specific institutions within defence tasked with countering corruption and building integrity. There are however, bodies whose remit covers…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
CVC is conceived to be the apex vigilance institution. It is independent from any executive authority. It is tasked with monitoring all vigilance activity…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
On the whole, anti-corruption mechanisms are in place. Units with the MoD do identify corruption risks. There is evidence of the CVC’s efforts to…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Indian public has traditionally had a deep reverence for its Armed Forces. It…
Explore
Q10 25/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 50 / 100
There is no evidence of regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Armed Forces personnel. However,…
Explore
Regularity Score: 0 / 100
As alluded to above, there is evidence to suggest a paradigm shift in the MoD and its incorporation of a risk management framework. There…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 25 / 100
As mentioned above, there is no evidence of regular corruption risk assessments but there is evidence of identification of corruption risks that affect policy…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 75/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 75 / 100
India has a clear process for the whole acquisition planning cycle. The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) is entrusted with coordinating the fifteen years Long…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Procedures and guidelines related to defence acquisition are publicly available as is information regarding assessment of needs. However, given the complexity of defence acquisition…
Explore
External oversight Score: 75 / 100
Oversight of defence acquisitions is primarily undertaken by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), the Central Bureau of Investigation…
Explore
Q12 75/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
No stand-alone comprehensive defence budget document exists in the public domain. A series of detailed documents in PDF and Excel format can be viewed…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The legislature receives an accurate defence budget proposal in a timely manner ahead of the start of the budget year. There is no evidence…
Explore
Q13 75/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Standing Committee on Defence is responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis. It considers the Demands for Grants of the Ministry of Defence…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Standing Committee on Defence carries out in-depth analysis of the Demand for Grants through formal mechanisms and provides written recommendations in reports [1].…
Explore
Q14 58/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
As alluded to in Q.12, no stand-alone comprehensive defence budget document exists in the public domain. A series of detailed documents in PDF and…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
As discussed in Q.12, no comprehensive unified defence budget document exists in the public domain directly from the government. A series of detailed documents…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 75 / 100
Under the Right To Information Act, 2005, citizens can request and obtain government information [1]. Under Chapter II, Section 4 (b)(xi): “(xi) the budget…
Explore
Q15 50/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
There are no publicly available official financial statements containing non-central government defence income particulars [1][2][3][4]. There are other financial statements available such as the…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
As stated above, there is no official information on non-central government defence income particulars. Internal audits are carried out by the Comptroller General of…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There is public scrutiny if misappropriations are reported in the media, as there is no official information on non-central government defence income particulars publicly…
Explore
Q16 50/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
The Comptroller General of Defence Accounts (CGDA) is head of the Defence Accounts Department (DAD) and undertakes the internal audit of the Ministry of…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 50 / 100
Internal audit processes are comprehensive and according to procedures, full reports should be available to oversight bodies such as the Standing Committee on Defence…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
As alluded to above, there is evidence of external scrutiny by CAG and the CBI [1][2]. External audit and oversight agencies can examine the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
At times, audit findings are recognised and at times, inadequacies are overlooked. AK Saxena former Additional Controller General of Defence Accounts (CGDA) at the…
Explore
Q17 75/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
Military defence expenditure is externally audited by the Comptroller Auditor General of Accounts (CAG) who has mandate under the provisions of the Indian Constitution…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
CAG is independent and functions autonomously [1][2]. PAC constitutes of 15 members from the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and 7 members from the Rajya…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Audit reports are published by CAG and PAC and are available online [1][2][3][4]. These reports are presented in Parliament hence are public documents. It…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry acknowledges audit findings by way of replies to observations and recommendations. According to former Director General of CAG, KP Shashidharan, in a…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 58/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that defence institutions are, by statutory or constitutional means, removed from having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Research did not identify evidence of defence institutions being involved in businesses relating to natural resource exploitation. Interests seems to be purely strategic, as…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
There is no recent evidence of individual defence personnel being involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation. However, there has in…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as there is no evidence that such interests exist. Overarching interest in natural resources seems to be…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as there is no evidence that such interests exist. As mentioned above, overarching interest in natural resources…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 38/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 75 / 100
India has a history of organised crime in the country. As early as 1984, the New York Times reported organised crime was a growth…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence to suggest that the government recognises the need to prepare for the risk of organised crime penetrating the defence sector…
Explore
Q20 58/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 75 / 100
There exists a law enforcement agency in the Army called the Corps of Military Police (CMP). The CMP has a broad mandate which includes…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
CAG, PAC, CVC and CBI have autonomy and in theory cannot be influenced by the executive or military officials. The CMP is a branch…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Though there is no public material on CMP investigations, there is evidence to suggest that the function of policing through joint vigillance activities with…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
India has a number of civilian and military intelligence agencies and most are shrouded in secrecy. The most publicly prominent are the Central Bureau…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable because, as stated above, there are currently no independent oversight mechanisms. There does appear to be executive…
Explore
Q22 25/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
India has a number of intelligence agencies and most are shrouded in secrecy. The most publicly prominent are the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 25 / 100
There has been criticism that the Indian Police Service (IPS) has had a favoured status in the recruitment processes of a number of intelligence…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
Given the secrecy shrouding India’s intelligence agencies, no central recruitment handbook is in existence at present but analysis of the IAS and IPS recruitment…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 0/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
India has neither signed up to nor ratified the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) [1][2].
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
India has not signed or ratified the ATT [1][2]. As such, this indicator has been scored Not Applicable.
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
India though not a signatory to the ATT, has a well-scrutinised arms control process as stated earlier. Chapter IVA of Foreign Trade (Development &…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
India has no framework for regulating lobbying activity. In August 2013, a press release was published by the government stating that at that point…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as country does not have legislation regulating lobbying in the defence sector [1].
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as country does not have legislation regulating lobbying in the defence sector [1].
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as country does not have legislation regulating lobbying in the defence sector [1].
Explore