Q35.
Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?
35a. Sanctions
Score
SCORE: 100/100
Rubric
Jordan score: 100/100
Score: 0/100
Offences are not defined; no evidence of other formal mechanisms. Or the military are exempt from law.
Score: 25/100
Bribery and/or corruption are not defined offences in law that apply to the defence sector, but there are wider legal mechanisms in place (e.g. national laws supported by policies, regulations, or other laws) used to address this.
Score: 50/100
Bribery and/or corruption are defined offences in law that clearly apply to the defence sector, but 2 or more of the following mechanisms are not provided for: offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting bribes. Sanctions exist in law, but maximum penalties constitute less than 1 year imprisonment or weak fines that would not act as a deterrent.
Score: 75/100
Bribery and/or corruption are defined offences in law that clearly apply to the defence sector, but 2 or more of the following mechanisms are not provided for: offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting bribes. Possible sanctions include criminal prosecution/ incarceration, dismissal, and considerable financial penalties.
Score: 100/100
There are a range of clearly defined offences in law that clearly apply to the defence sector. These offences cover (at a minimum) offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official or other person in charge of a public or legal duty. Possible sanctions include criminal prosecution/ incarceration, dismissal, and considerable financial penalties.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
35b. Enforcement
Score
SCORE: 25/100
Rubric
Jordan score: 25/100
Score: 0/100
There is a complete failure to investigate or prosecute, even in the face of clear evidence.
Score: 25/100
Instances of bribery or corruption are superficially investigated or rarely disclipined.
Score: 50/100
Instances of bribery or corruption are investigated but not often disciplined. There is clear undue influence in the decision making process.
Score: 75/100
Instances of bribery or corruption are investigated or disciplined through formal processes, but undue political influence is attempted and sometimes effective at derailing prosecutions.
Score: 100/100
Instances of bribery or corruption are investigated or disciplined through formal processes and without undue political influence.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 35a. Sanctions | 35b. Enforcement |
---|---|---|
Albania | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Algeria | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Angola | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Argentina | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Armenia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Australia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Bahrain | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Bangladesh | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Belgium | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Botswana | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Brazil | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Cameroon | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Canada | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Chile | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
China | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Colombia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Cote d'Ivoire | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Denmark | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Egypt | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Estonia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Finland | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
France | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Germany | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Ghana | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Greece | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Hungary | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
India | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Indonesia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Iran | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Iraq | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Italy | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Japan | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Jordan | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Kenya | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Kosovo | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Kuwait | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Latvia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Lebanon | 50 / 100 | NEI |
Lithuania | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Malaysia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Mali | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Mexico | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Montenegro | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Morocco | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Myanmar | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Netherlands | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
New Zealand | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Niger | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Nigeria | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
North Macedonia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Norway | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Oman | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Palestine | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Philippines | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Poland | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Portugal | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Qatar | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Russia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Serbia | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Singapore | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Africa | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Korea | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
South Sudan | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Spain | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Sudan | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Sweden | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Switzerland | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Taiwan | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Tanzania | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Thailand | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Tunisia | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Turkey | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Uganda | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Ukraine | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
United Kingdom | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
United States | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Venezuela | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Zimbabwe | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |