Q4.
Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?
4a. Policy of openness
Score
SCORE: 50/100
Rubric
Kosovo score: 50/100
Score: 0/100
There is no formal or informal policy that requires openness towards CSOs in the defence sector.
Score: 50/100
There is a policy that requires defence and security institutions to be open towards CSOs. However, there is no explicit mention of how to do that.
Score: 100/100
There is a policy that requires defence and security institutions to be open towards CSOs and the establishment of mechanisms to that end (e.g. consultation and sharing of information).
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
4b. CSO protections
Score
SCORE: 75/100
Rubric
Kosovo score: 75/100
Score: 0/100
There is very little or no space for civil society organisations to operate within the country. Independent CSOs may be accused of / charged with treason, espionage, subversion, foreign interference, or terrorism.
Score: 25/100
CSOs are allowed to operate within the country, but the government uses manifestly restrictive laws to silence them or establishes burdensome registration and tax requirements.
Score: 50/100
CSOs enjoy a range of protections from government interference, and are able to operate within the country. However, they experience or fear potential reprisals by government.
Score: 75/100
CSOs enjoy a range of protections from government interference, and are able to operate without intimidation from the government. However, they may not have complete access or freedoms in some sensitive areas.
Score: 100/100
CSOs enjoy a range of protections (e.g. rights to freedom of expression or freedom of association) from government interference, and are able to operate openly and without intimidation from the government.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
4c. Practice of openness
Score
SCORE: 0/100
Rubric
Kosovo score: 0/100
Score: 0/100
Requests by CSOs to work with the defence sector are denied.
Score: 25/100
There has been some consideration of engaging CSOs and meetings may have taken place with the defence sector, but they tend to take place with CSOs that are either very supportive of, or are explicitly funded by, the government. OR CSO activity is extremely minimal in this area, and defence and security institutions rarely engage for this reason.
Score: 50/100
Defence and security institutions are seeking (or are beginning to seek) CSO engagement from a range of CSOs, but not on corruption issues.
Score: 75/100
Defence and security institutions are open towards CSOs but have infrequently or superficially worked on issues of corruption. The military does not engage with CSOs on corruption issues.
Score: 100/100
Defence and security institutions have specifically worked with CSOs on corruption issues on a regular and/or in depth basis. This includes not only civilian representative of government (head of internal audit, PR person), but also military representatives.
Assessor Explanation
Assessor Sources
Compare scores by country
Please view this page on a larger screen for the full stats.
Country | 4a. Policy of openness | 4b. CSO protections | 4c. Practice of openness |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Algeria | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Angola | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Argentina | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Armenia | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Australia | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Azerbaijan | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Bahrain | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Bangladesh | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Belgium | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Botswana | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Brazil | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Burkina Faso | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Cameroon | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Canada | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Chile | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
China | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Colombia | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Cote d'Ivoire | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Denmark | 0 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Egypt | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Estonia | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Finland | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
France | 0 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Germany | 25 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Ghana | 0 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Greece | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Hungary | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
India | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Indonesia | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Iran | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Iraq | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Israel | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Italy | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Japan | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Jordan | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Kenya | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Kosovo | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Kuwait | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Latvia | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Lebanon | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Lithuania | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Malaysia | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Mali | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Mexico | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Montenegro | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Morocco | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Myanmar | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Netherlands | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
New Zealand | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Niger | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Nigeria | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
North Macedonia | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Norway | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Oman | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Palestine | 0 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Philippines | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
Poland | 25 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Portugal | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Qatar | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Russia | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Saudi Arabia | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Serbia | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Singapore | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
South Africa | 0 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
South Korea | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
South Sudan | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Spain | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Sudan | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Sweden | 50 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Switzerland | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Taiwan | 100 / 100 | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
Tanzania | 0 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Thailand | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Tunisia | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Turkey | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Uganda | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 50 / 100 |
Ukraine | 100 / 100 | 50 / 100 | 75 / 100 |
United Arab Emirates | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
United Kingdom | 75 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
United States | 25 / 100 | 100 / 100 | 25 / 100 |
Venezuela | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 |
Zimbabwe | 0 / 100 | 0 / 100 | 25 / 100 |