Political Risk:

Very Low

Score:

85/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 83/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
The Parliament (Saeima) has full formal rights to approve, revise and veto laws and strategic documents related to defence policy, as well as the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Parliament is largely effective in determining the defence policy by approving and revising laws, strategic documents and the budget. It regularly adopts and…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Neither the executive branch, nor the military coerce or unduly influence Parliament to vote in its favour, but the Parliament does not tend to…
Explore
Q2 100/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Committee for Defence, Interior and Coruption Prevention is a standing committee in charge of the legislation process in the spheres of national security,…
Explore
Expertise Score: 100 / 100
Members of the Committee of the present Parliament are experienced in security and defence matters. One of the members is the former minister of…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
The National Security Law tasks the Parliament with approving both a new National Security Concept and State Defence Concept at least every term of…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
Normally, the committee meets twice a week and discusses a wide range of issues, both legislative (discusses and prepares draft legal acts and policy…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Committee invites ministries and other institutions to report on specific issues, as well as organising on-site meetings. Most of the major issues falling…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence operates according to the laws adopted by the Parliament [1]. Above all, the Parliament approves the Cabinet of Ministers, including…
Explore
Q3 81/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 100 / 100
National defence and security policy and strategies are publicly available and widely debated by the Parliament, government, as well as in public, given the…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 75 / 100
Discussion of the defence policy and security strategy focuses primarily on major threats (Russia) and the level of defence spending (as a reaction to…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 75 / 100
Public consultations take place at both parliamentary and ministerial level. Since the Deputy Prime Minister is also the Minister of Defence, the defence and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Draft legal acts and policy planning documents are usually availabe to the public well in advance, on the websites of the Ministry of Defence,…
Explore
Q4 100/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 100 / 100
According to the Information Transparency Law, the public has access to information that is at the disposal of the institution. This law establishes a…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 100 / 100
According to the law “About Public organizations and their associations”, CSOs have the right to perform public activities that are not in conflict with…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 100 / 100
In practice, and in comparison with other sectors, the cooperation is good. But sometimes it is necessary to ask twice or more. Also, the…
Explore
Q5 88/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Latvia is not a significant defence exporter. [1] It signed the UNCAC Convention on May 19, 2005, and ratified it on January 4, 2006.…
Explore
Compliance Score: 75 / 100
The latest Review of implementation of the UNCAC available (2014) identified both successes and good practices, as well as challenges in the implementation of…
Explore
Q6 88/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
The defence policy at large is widely debated by the parliament, the government, as well as in public given the topicality of the issue…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 75 / 100
The MOD engages in cooperation with CSOs, which also helps foster the public security debate. The most visible example of this is the Riga…
Explore
Q7 100/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
There is a organisational anti-corruption plan in the Ministry of Defence and its subordinate institutions. [1] However, the anti-coruption policy cannot be found on…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 100 / 100
The MOD regularly provides information to the KNAB in the form of reports on the implementation of the tasks specified in the Guidelines for…
Explore
Q8 83/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
The MOD has established the Audit and Inspection Department (AID), which ensures integrity and is responsible for the implementation of anti-corruption measures. The MOD…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
Such institutions as KNAB [1] and the State Audit [2] are independent and well-resourced. They report directly to the Defence, Internal Affairs and Corruption…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
Since the main institutions tasked with building integrity and countering corruption (as indicated in Q8A) are KNAB and the State Audit, their performance has…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no empirical data to test if the public particularly trusts the institutions…
Explore
Q10 100/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 100 / 100
The MOD fulfils the tasks mentioned in the KNAB anti-corruption guidelines. The MOD has started using the International Risk Assessment Tool, implementing the recommendations…
Explore
Regularity Score: 100 / 100
Each year, according to the anti-corruption plan, the responsible institutions such as the MOD carry out corruption risk assessments and an anti-corruption plan is…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
Regular assessments of defence sector corruption risks are carried out at various levels, and risks are annually identified and dealt with. The MOD also…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 58/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 75 / 100
There is a clear formal process in place for the entire acquisition planning cycle. The legal framework is defined in the Law on public…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Often, major arms procurement decisions via government-to-government (G2G) contracts, are announced post-factum, e.g. the decision to procure CVR(T)s in 2014, M109 155mm self-propelled howitzers…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
External oversight functions are carried out by the State Audit Office, for whom one of the points of working interest in the defence sector…
Explore
Q12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The general defence budget, including what is allocated to the defence sector, is openly available and gives a full picture of the key categories…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The parliament receives an accurate defence budget proposal in sufficient time before the next financial year begins (e.g. in 2017, the Cabinet of Ministers…
Explore
Q13 75/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Budget and Finance (Taxation) Committee is the main sub-institution of the parliament with regards to drafting the state budget (the Public Expenditure and…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Budget and Finance committee is the responsible Committee for budget readings in Parlament. Additionally, both Committee for Defence, Internal Affairs and Corruption Prevention…
Explore
Q14 100/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 100 / 100
The general defence budget is openly availalable and gives a full picture of the key categories of defence expenditure (e.g. the state budget for…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The general defence budget is openly availalable and gives a full picture of the key categories of defence expenditure (e.g. the state budget for…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 100 / 100
As long as the information does not concern objective national security reasons, individuals, the media, companies and non-governmental organizations are entitled by law to…
Explore
Q15 100/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
There is a full annual publication of all expected sources (e.g. utilisation of real estate, services provided in geospatial issues) and amounts to be…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Mechanisms of scrutiny are in place and administered by the Audit and Inspection Department of the Ministry of Defence, as well as by the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Given the limited amount of income of this sort (approximately 0,31% of the total defence budget for 2018), [1, 3] is has not been…
Explore
Q16 81/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The external auditor, the State Audit Office, has a good and effective cooperation with the Internal Audit Department and Inspection Department of the Ministry…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 75 / 100
The external auditor, the State Audit Office, has a good and effective cooperation with the Internal Audit Department and Inspection Department of the Ministry…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
The external auditor, the State Audit Office, has a good and effective cooperation with the Internal Audit Department and Inspection Department of the Ministry…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The external auditor, the State Audit Office, has a good and effective cooperation with the Internal Audit Department and Inspection Department of the Ministry…
Explore
Q17 88/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The State Audit Office has an extensive mandate to review the defence sector, which it regularly executes with regards to defence sector spending and…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
The State Audit Office is an independent institution and, as the law according to which it operates states, “it is accountable only to the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Reports of the external audits are published online proactively. They are detailed and comprehensive. Audits since 2001 are available on the website of the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 75 / 100
As underlined by the State Audit Office, the Ministry of Defence is cooperative and regularly addresses audit findings in its practices. However, this does…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 100/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence must comply with all laws regarding natural resources exploitation and nature protection [1] [2]. None of the relevant laws has…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of defence institutions involvement in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation [1].
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of individual defence personnel involvement in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation. It must be noted that there…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there are no natural resources in the country of interest to defence industry.
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there are no natural resources in the country of interest to defence industry.
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 100/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There have been no reports of military involvement in sectors in which organised crime operates. Therefore, this risk is very low. This was confirmed…
Explore
Government response Score: 100 / 100
The government is well aware of the risks posed by the organised crime. It has adopted a Plan for preventing and combating organised crime…
Explore
Q20 100/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The KNAB or the CCPB is the main government institution charged with investigating serious crimes, which it has done with success recognised in international…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
KNAB is an independent public administration institution under the supervision of the Cabinet of Ministers. The supervision is executed by the Prime Minister. It…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The KNAB or the CCPB is the main government institution charged with investigating serious crimes, which it has done with success recognised in international…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 63/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 75 / 100
There are three intelligence services in Latvia: the Security Police (DP), Constitution Protection Bureau (SAB) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIDD). They operate…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The committee of the 13.Saima is comprised of 6 members – one from each political group of the parliament. 5 of them have served…
Explore
Q22 67/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 75 / 100
There are three intelligence services in Latvia: the Security Police (DP), Constitution Protection Bureau (SAB) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIDD). They operate…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 75 / 100
There have been no reports of interventions by third parties in the selection process, and the director of the SAB and the chief of…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
The director of the SAB is appointed by the Parliament for a term of 5 years based on the proposal of the National Security…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 100/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Latvia signed and ratified the ATT on April 2, 2014. [1]
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
Latvia has openly submitted available annual compliance reports since 2015. [1] There is no evidence to show that Latvia does not comply with any…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Latvia is not a significant arms exporter and thus the Parliament does not debate arms exports.
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legislation regulating lobbying generally and thus also no legislation regulating lobbying in defence institutions. KNAB submitted a draft Lobbying openness law…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying generally and thus also no legislation regulating lobbying in defence institutions.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying generally and thus also no legislation regulating lobbying in defence institutions.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying generally and thus also no legislation regulating lobbying in defence institutions.
Explore