Procurement Risk:

Low

Score:

74/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 50/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Latvia has clear and comprehensive legislation that covers all defence and national security purchases…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 25 / 100
The general and defence and security related procurement legislation does not mention coruption risks explicitly, though measures included in the legislation clearly aim to…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
There is a clear order for vetting the application of the legislation by the internal auditing units of the defence and security sector, as…
Explore
Q58 92/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The entire defence procurement cycle, from the assessment of needs, to the contract implementation and sign-off, and the asset disposal, is fully formalised. The…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
In general, the whole defence procurement cycle is transparent. The procurement cycle is disclosed according to both the ‘Public Procurement Law’ and the ‘Defence…
Explore
Implementation Score: 100 / 100
There are detailed policies and procedures for each step of the implementation process of the procurement cycle defined by the Public procurement law [1]…
Explore
Q59 83/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
External procurement oversight mechanisms – the State Audit Office, Procurement Monitoring Bureau and Competition Council and the processes they run – are independent and…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Procurement oversight mechanisms/institutions mentioned in the previous sub-indicator are active in summoning witnesses and documents, demanding explanations, and issuing recommendations and conclusions that have…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
There is comprehensive evidence of activity of the overseeing state instiutions, in particular of the State Audit Office. Reports of the external audits, including…
Explore
Q60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
The Government has adopted the long term National Defence Forces Development Plan for 2016-2028. The plan is published publicly in general terms without specification…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
A list of expected procurements and expected centralised procurements is published for the upcoming year, [1] whereas longer-term purchases are only generally identified, e.g.…
Explore
Q61 50/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
Defence purchases are made public with almost no exceptions – major ones are usually announced by the Ministry of Defence to the media (previously…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 25 / 100
Information about the major defence purchases usually is announced by the Ministry of Defence to the media either in press releases or interviews, while…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 63/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
There are formal policies and procedures explaining which companies could be discriminated against and on what grounds, covered by two main laws used in…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 75 / 100
Consistent implementation of the two main laws: the Public procurement law and the Defence and security procurement law – is ensured by monitoring how…
Explore
Q63 75/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
Most of the procurement requirements are clearly derived from the State Defence Concept [1] and no major procurements non-consistent with the needs defined in…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Scrutiny is occasionally conducted by the Parliament and the State Audit Office [1] [2] to verify if procurements are made in line with the…
Explore
Purchases Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces systematically bases all purchases on clearly identified and quantified requirements revealed in the National defence concept and…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 75/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 100 / 100
There are no detailed, openly available, comparable statistics on the allocation of defence procurements; the publicly available information confirms that most are conducted through…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 50 / 100
All procurements are subject to external scrutiny by the State Audit Office which has the power to request any information related to the procedures…
Explore
Q65 67/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 100 / 100
Officials involved in designing tender specifications and taking decisions are subject to regulations designed to prevent conflicts of interest, including restrictions on professional activity…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information regarding audit trails specifically that can be found to provide a score for this indicator. Decisions of the tender…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Tender board regulations and codes of conduct are explicitly defined in the legislation, including the minimum number of members, procedures of establishment and operation,…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no publicly available information on external verification. According to the government reviewer, all technical specifications are available for comments to industry during…
Explore
Q66 75/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Legislation is in place prohibiting collusion between the representatives of the defence sector and bidders, and between bidders themselves (Public Procurements Law, Defence and…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
There is clear legislation and freedom of action (and duty) for the procurement commissions to exclude bidders from the competition in case the bidder…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The Competition Council has demonstrated activity and independence on various occasions, punishing collusion between bidders. It has also warned the defence sector of the…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The Competition Council offers training for procurement specialists on collusion patterns and potential malpractices. [1] [2]
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NEI/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
The MOD has introduced formal policies and procedures of monitoring, assessment and reporting upon a supplier’s service and or delivery obligations. Assigned civil servants…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
All contracts, including modifications, are publicy availabe in the public database of the Procurement Monitoring Bureau. [1] The information at the disposition of the…
Explore
Monitoring Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. There is no public information available relating to the monitoring of contractors and their obligations
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. No details could be found regarding the frequency of enforcement with regards to breaches of…
Explore
Q68 100/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Decisions of the tender boards (procurement commissions) can be challenged in the Procurement Monitoring Bureau and in court. [1] [2] The list of the…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 100 / 100
The complaints mechanisms available to bidders are clearly defined, accessible [1] [2] and reasonably priced (e.g. in case of public procurements falling under the…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 100 / 100
The legislation does not allow for discrimination of complainants in future procurements. [1] [2] The active use of the complaint mechanisms suggests that companies…
Explore
Q69 100/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Latvian Criminal Code criminalises active and passive bribery and abuse of influence, prescribing sanctions of imprisonment of up to five years (or up…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 100 / 100
The cases are solved according to the Latvian Criminal Law. [1] The judicial system is a politically independent state system. [2] At the same…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. The amercement is ordered by the court or, in the cases provided for by the…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 100/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Offset contracts are prohibited by the law based on EU legislation. [1] [2]
Explore
Due diligence Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore
Monitoring Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that offset contracts are concluded in the defence sector of Latvia. Offset contracts…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 63/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The use of agents and intermediaries is technically allowed according to the legislation as far as the contractor is able to prove its eligibility…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Sanctions have to be applied according to the legislation (Law on Public Procurements [1], Defence and Security Procurements Law [2]). There have been no…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 75/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 75 / 100
Usually major details of major procurements’ financing packages are made publicly available to include the sums involved and the timelines of delivery (e.g. CVR(T)s,…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Almost no acquisitions are granted as a result of political influence by the selling…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ministry of Defence and the National Armed Forces almost always cite clear and…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Domestic political pressures have been growing in recent years to support the domestic defence…
Explore