Political Risk:

High

Score:

35/100

Collapse
1 58/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Liberia has a bicameral legislature: a Senate and a House of Representatives.[1] The Constitution provides for these legislative bodies to oversee of the defence.[2]…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
In the Legislature, there are two oversight committees on defence and security. In the Upper House, the Senate, the Committee is referred to as…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The independence of the Liberian Legislature is formally enshrined in the Constitution, which clearly establishes a bicameral legislature, the Senate and the House of…
Explore
2 38/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Liberia’s Legislature has designated security and defence oversight committees in the Upper House and the Senate. This committee is referred to as Defence, National…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
The committee is comprised of members with some level of expertise in the defence sector. [1][4] Some of those in the committee include former…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
These Committees were much more responsive to policymaking during the period of the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) [1] However, since UNMIL exited…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
The committee meets regularly, at least once a month. The short-term oversight entails conducting a budget hearing and making amendments to the budget. The…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The committee’s long-term investigation is not commissioned, nor conducted. The Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) highlights that Liberia’s Legislature lacks systematic, long-term…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The Senate confirmation hearing provides an opportunity for the minister to share his vision for the office. Such a vision is more often aligned…
Explore
3 17/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 0 / 100
There is no recent record of the national security strategy being debated. The last public consultation held on the national security strategy was held…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: NA / 100
In 2008, Liberia’s first post-war national security strategy document was drafted. The drafting was preceded by an extensive, countrywide consultation, which in effect opened…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
The last public consultation on the national security strategy was carried out in the last term of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s administration (2012-2017).[1] On June…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
A review of the official defence websites in Liberia reveals that the information provided is outdated and not updated in real time. For instance,…
Explore
4 50/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
The policy of openness outlines that matters of defence and security ought to be open and consultative. This policy of openness led to the…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
Numerous civil society groups and nongovernmental organizations (NGO), including human rights organisations, operate in the country. A National Aid and NGO policy was introduced…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
In the transition process of Liberia from the notion of regime security to human security, CSOs have played an active role in partnering with…
Explore
5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Liberia is not a significant defence exporter. Liberia acceded to the UNCAC on 16 Sep 2005.[1] and considered a State Party.[2] The country has…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
Liberia is a State Party to UNCAC, and a 2022 civil society parallel report (executive summary) indicates that while legal instruments for implementing Chapter…
Explore
6 50/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 75 / 100
There is evidence of regular ongoing public debate on issues of defence.[1] The civil society Security Sector Working Group is one of the many…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 25 / 100
The government engagement happens often behind the scenes than in the open and in the public space.[1] The Senate and Lower House Committees are…
Explore
7 63/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
According to the Act establishing the Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC), the Commission is mandated to investigate all acts of corruption across the public, private,…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 25 / 100
The National Defense Act 2008, Chapter 8, Code of Conduct, states that all personnel of the Armed Forces of Liberia (AFL) shall adhere to…
Explore
8 42/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 100 / 100
The National Defense Act 2008, Chapter 8, Code of Conduct, states that all personnel of the Armed Forces of Liberia (AFL) shall adhere to…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
There are some internal accountability structures outlined in Liberia’s defence and security legal framework. The National Defense Act of 2008 mandates the establishment of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
Staff of the Defence sector are recruited with full knowledge of the risk of corruption. Accordingly, they are trained to minimise the risk through…
Explore
9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
There are a few reports on public trust in the Armed Forces of Liberia and the security sector in general. The social cohesion and…
Explore
10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
There are no regular assessments carried out in the defence sector.[1] Concerns about national security have been used to circumvent the process of audits…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
Risk assessments are not conducted; this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.[1][2][3][4]
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
Risk assessments are not conducted; this sub-indicator is marked Not Applicable.[1)][2][3][4]
Explore
11 33/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
The process of acquisition planning formally begins with the Ministry of National Defense submitting its budget requests to the Ministry of Finance and Development…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Liberia’s defence and security legal framework, including the National Defense Act of 2008 and the National Security Agency (NSA) Act, outlines procedures for acquisition…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
Liberia’s external oversight of defence acquisition planning involves three primary institutions: 1. General Auditing Commission (GAC): As Liberia’s supreme audit institution, the GAC conducts…
Explore
12 38/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
The Defence budget is not accessible in terms of detail showing key expenditure.[1] Rather, the budget is a composite of the Armed Forces of…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 50 / 100
In 2013, the Ministry of Finance and Development Planning replaced the Ministry of Finance, with the mandate to formulate, institutionalise, and administer economic development,…
Explore
13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
There are two legislative committees mandated to scrutinise the defence budget.[1] Both the Ways and Means Committee and the Defence Committee review and scrutinise…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
These Committees possess formal power+K49:K51s to influence decision-making. These powers include the authority to confirm or reject presidential appointments to key positions within the…
Explore
14 25/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 25 / 100
Beyond the general review during the legislative budget process, there is limited knowledge of expenditure and detailed allocation. However, the Defence budget is published…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The approved defence budget is available through the Ministry of Finance and Development Planning. However, certain aspects of the Defence budget, especially the section…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
Requests for defence-related information are usually funnelled through the Ministry of National Defense’s bureaucratic channels. Due to security concerns, such requests undergo careful scrutiny.[1][2]…
Explore
15 0/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no alternative source of income for the Ministry of National Defense. The primary source of income is the budgetary support as allocated…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
In Liberia, the Internal Audit Agency (IAA) is legally mandated to establish and oversee internal audit functions across all branches of government, including the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
In Liberia, formal mechanisms for scrutinising non-central government sources of funding within the defence sector are limited.[1] While the General Auditing Commission (GAC) and…
Explore
16 13/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
In Liberia, the effectiveness of internal audit processes within the Ministry of National Defense (MoD) remains limited. The Internal Audit Agency (IAA) has faced…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of enabling oversight of the internal audit function of the Ministry of Defense (MoD) by parliamentary committees.[1] The General Auditing…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is a scope limitation in the external audit of the internal audit function in the defence ministry expenditure. According to the GAC, based…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The IAA is mandated to establish and direct internal audit functions across the Executive, Judiciary and Legislative branches of government.[1] In the security sector,…
Explore
17 63/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The General Auditing Commission (GAC) is external and mandated to conduct financial audits of MACs. Compared to internal audit, these external audits are designed…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The external audit undertaken by the GAC is independent and protected by law.[1] As a matter of procedure, it reports to the Legislature with…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The GAC conducts audit by first investigating government consolidated accounts. This account is where all government transactions are generated. It later goes to individual…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The findings of the GAC audit are often systematic, particularly in terms of breaches of the public financial management law.[1] However, due to the…
Explore
18 35/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
The 2008 National Defense Act of Liberia explicitly prohibits members of the Armed Forces of Liberia (AFL) from engaging in outside employment without prior…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
While there is no recent public documentation or findings directly linking current defence institutions in Liberia to businesses in the natural resource sector,[1] historical…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
The Liberian government has established legal frameworks aimed at regulating the involvement of defence personnel in private enterprises. The 2008 National Defense Act mandates…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The transparency of public officials’ interests in Liberia, particularly around asset declarations and conflict of interest, remains a significant challenge. While the Code of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The scrutiny of public officials’ financial interests in Liberia, particularly concerning asset declarations, has been largely superficial. The Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC) is designated…
Explore
19 50/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 50 / 100
In 2023, the Liberia Drug Enforcement Agency (LDEA), jointly with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, seized 520 kg of cocaine, valued at approximately US$100…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
The government of Liberia launched an investigation into how drugs arrived in Liberia. In the meantime, the Ministry of Justice expressed disappointment in the…
Explore
20 0/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 0 / 100
No policing function is exercised over the defence sector to investigate corruption or organised crime. Rather, the police have a unit called the Professional…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
No policing function is exercised over the defence sector to investigate corruption or organised crime.[1][2] Therefore, this indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
No policing function is exercised over the defence sector to investigate corruption or organised crime.[1][2] Therefore, this indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore
21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
According to Chapter 5, Article 29, of the legislature, the Senate and House of Representatives have the power to enact laws, review and appeal…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
While Liberia’s Constitution and legislative framework grant the Legislature oversight authority over security matters, in practice, access to classified information remains restricted. The National…
Explore
22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
The Act establishing National Security Agency states that the Director General and his deputy shall be appointed by the President with Senate confirmation required…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
The Act establishing the National Security Agency (NSA) stipulates that the Director General and Deputy are appointed by the President, subject to Senate confirmation.…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
The Act establishing National Security Agency outlines that the Director General and his deputy shall be presidential appointees. This makes the selection criteria clear…
Explore
23 100/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Liberia signed the ATT 4 June 2013, ratified it 21 Apr 2015, and the ATT entered into force 20 July 2015.[1]
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
Liberia was the first ECOWAS member state to fully domesticate the ATT by amending its Firearms and Ammunition Control Act of 2015 to align…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Liberia has established the National Arms Commission. Though the arms embargo have been lifted since 2016, legislative oversight on arms has not evolved to…
Explore
76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework regulating lobbying activity. The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) categorises Liberia’s Parliament as lacking transparency measures regarding lobbying.[1][2]
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
There is no legal framework regulating lobbying activity.[1][2] Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
There is no legal framework regulating lobbying activity.[1][2] Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no legal framework regulating lobbying activity.[1][2] Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Expand
Q1 NA/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Q2 NA/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Q3 NA/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Q4 NA/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Q5 NA/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Q6 NA/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Q7 NA/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Q8 NA/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Q9 NA/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Q10 NA/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 NA/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Q12 NA/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Q13 NA/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Q14 NA/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Q15 NA/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Q16 NA/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Q17 NA/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 NA/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 NA/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Q20 NA/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 NA/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Q22 NA/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 NA/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 NA/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question