Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Mexico Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
The Mexican Army and Air Force train and prepare military personnel to effectively carry out their general missions. The training for military operations comprises…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no public evidence of a military doctrine that considers corruption a strategic issue for operations. As such, this indicator is marked ‘Not…
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
As noted previously, Mexico’s participation in peacekeeping missions in other countries is very recent and, therefore, the training provided before these mobilisations has focused,…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
The Military Education System fosters a culture in anti-corruption matters taking into account principles such as legality, honesty, loyalty, impartiality, and efficiency that all…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
The general planning of policies that respond to internal and external threats that affect national security and defense are contained in the Joint National…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Mexico has little experience in mobilising peacekeeping missions, deploying 83 members of the military and police personnel (May 2015 to May 2019) in United…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of M&E guidance for missions on how to monitor corruption and no evidence of professionals being deployed to monitor associated…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Mexico has little experience in mobilising peacekeeping missions, deploying 83 members of the military and police personnel (May 2015 to May 2019) in United…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of specific guidelines for personnel addressing corruption risks in contracting during peacekeeping missions. [1] [2] [3]
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of personnel receiving training on corruption risks during peacekeeping missions. [1] [2] [3]
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. In Mexico, the use of private military contractors is not regulated and the Montreux…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are no provisions for the supervision of Private Military Contractors. There is a…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Mexico does not have policies or regulations on the use of Private Military Contractors.…
Explore