Political Risk:

High

Score:

38/100

Collapse
1 50/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
Formally, Parliament approves, enforces, and supervises laws on defence and security; approves and reviews state budget included in the defence and security budget; and…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
There is legislation guaranteeing legislative oversight over defence policy. Article 178(n) of the Constitution assigns the Assembly the responsibility to define defence and security…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
According to the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure [1] and the Defence and Security Policy [2], legislative scrutiny of defence policy is required to be…
Explore
2 33/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 75 / 100
In Parliament, there is the Defence, Security and Public Order Committee responsible for national defence and security policies; policies for training and developing the…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
It has been alleged that a number of the Parliamentary Defence and Security Committee members do not possess sufficient knowledge of the National Defence…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 50 / 100
The Defence and Security Policy of the Republic of Mozambique was approved by Act 17/97, of October 1, in 1997 [1, 2], and revised…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
Short-term oversight of Defence and Security Units is rarely conducted due to a lack of resources, particularly for funding the travel of members of…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
There is a Parliamentary Committee for Defence, Order and Public Security whose mission is to provide long-term supervision [1]. However, usually, long-term and strategic…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence, sometimes, incorporate recommendations into their practices, taking into account what is established by the Constitution of the Republic of Mozambique…
Explore
3 6/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 25 / 100
There is a National Defence and Security Policy [1], but there is no National Defence and Security Strategy. The Defence and Security Policy is…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 0 / 100
The discussion is not deep and focuses on issues related to the mission, objectives, responsibilities, and exclusivity of each Defence and Security Forces, civil-military…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
The Defence and Security Policy requires citizens to defend the homeland and promote state security and public order. It also outlines the involvement of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The public can access documents and information on the Defence and Security Policy in Parliament. There is the Parliament Library that makes all documents…
Explore
4 33/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
The culture of secrecy regarding defence and security issues compromises transparency and the relationship with civil society organisations [5]. One of the basic guiding…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
Since the early 1990s, CSOs in Mozambique have benefited from a range of legal protections, including the rights to freedom of association, expression, and…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
The Defence and Security Institutions engage CSOs on several aspects of National Defence and Security, including gender issues [1], Child soldiers [2], human rights…
Explore
5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
According to SIPRI, Mozambique is not a significant arms exporter [1]. It signed up and ratified at least the UNCAC Convention, the African Union…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
The country is not a significant producer and exporter of Defence and Security products, but it has signed and ratified the Arms Trade Treaty…
Explore
6 38/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 25 / 100
In Mozambique, public debate among academics, journalists, opinion makers and CSOs on matters of defence and national security is occasional. This debate is conducted…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
Traditionally, the government has been relatively uninvolved in public discussions on defence and security. However, with the emergence of the terrorist insurgency in Cabo…
Explore
7 38/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
In Mozambique, there is a general legal and institutional framework for combating corruption. There is no specific anti-corruption legislation for the Defence Sector [1].…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 25 / 100
In recent years, Mozambique’s leadership has repeatedly emphasised the need to combat corruption within the defence sector. In 2021, during the opening of the…
Explore
8 42/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
In the Mozambican Armed Forces, there is the Inspectorate General of Defence, which is a unit responsible for monitoring compliance, ethics, integrity, and corruption…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Constitution of the Republic, the Defence Policy, and the ordinary laws of the Defence and Security Forces require that the Defence and Security…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
In terms of effectiveness, the staff of the Ministry of Defence and the Mozambican Armed Forces who deal with inspection, integrity, ethics, and anti-corruption…
Explore
9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
The level of trust in the Armed Forces, as one of the most honest and trustworthy institutions in Mozambique, has decreased given the lack…
Explore
10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
The assessments of the General Inspectorate of Defence have focused on the inspection of Human Resources; Inspection of Material Resources; Inspection of Financial Resources;…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
No corruption risks assessment are conducted in the defence sector so this indicator is marked Non Applicable [1, 2, 3].
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
No corruption risks assessment are conducted in the defence sector so this indicator is marked Non Applicable [1, 2, 3].
Explore
11 50/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
There is a clear process for the entire production cycle, acquisition planning, export and import of defence products [1]; the Defence Budget is made…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The expenditure on the production, acquisition planning, and export of defence products is presented in the General State Budget and in the Economic and…
Explore
External oversight Score: 25 / 100
The inspection, supervision, and monitoring units operate within a legal framework, which includes: 1) Parliamentary Regulations, granting oversight powers and responsibilities to the Defence,…
Explore
12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The Defence Budget of Mozambique is integrated into the State Budget and is presented with a comprehensive and disaggregated breakdown of expenditure across functions.…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
According to Mozambique’s legal framework, specifically the SISTAFE Law (Sistema de Administração Financeira do Estado), the government is mandated to submit the draft State…
Explore
13 75/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Parliamentary Defence, Security and Public Order Commission has powers to supervise the defence budget [1]. The defence budget is incorporated into the General…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Parliamentary Committee on Defence, Security and Public Order has the authority to analyse the Defence Budget and attempts to influence budgetary decisions through…
Explore
14 42/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The approved Defence Budget is proactively published for the public through the Economic and Social Plan and State Budget [1]. In practice, citizens, civil…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
The vast majority of the approved Defence Budget is fully disclosed and comprehensiveness to the media and civil society actors, with exceptions made for…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 50 / 100
The approved Defence Budget is made publicly available on the website of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and is published in the Official…
Explore
15 33/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The Defence and Security institutions (Armed Forces, Police Forces and Intelligence Services) have their companies and economic and financial enterprises, such as “Empresas Monte…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Mechanisms for scrutiny and oversight are in place and administered by a central government department. At the Ministry of National Defence, the General Inspectorate…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The defence revenue sources other than central government allocations are monitored and audited internally and externally. Internal audits are conducted by the National Defence…
Explore
16 50/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The National Defence Inspectorate is responsible for ensuring oversight and accountability within the Ministry of National Defence. Its key functions include: • Conducting inspections,…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 50 / 100
The inspections are carried out for sensitive or critical issues related to human resources, financial resources and operational issues, but are for the exclusive…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Internal audit reports and Armed Forces documents are classified as “Secret” under the State Secrets Law [1, 2]. These reports are rarely shared with…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
In terms of institutional outcomes, the internal audits is carried out by the National Defence Inspectorate and there are very few cases of disclosure…
Explore
17 0/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
In Mozambique, external auditing of the Armed Forces is extremely limited. There is no supreme audit institution with a dedicated mandate over the defence…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
There is no supreme institution that carries out external audits of defence expenditure [1, 2]. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no supreme institution that carries out external audits of defence expenditure [1, 2]. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
There is no supreme institution that carries out external audits of defence expenditure [1, 2]. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
18 30/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The Constitution of the Republic [1], the Defence and Security Policy [2], and the Law on National Defence and the Armed Forces [3] do…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
The Constitution of the Republic and Defence Policy would prohibit defence institutions from engaging in business related to the exploitation of the country’s natural…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
The Statute of the Military of the Armed Forces of Mozambique states that military personnel, in the exercise of their functions, are exclusively at…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The Constitution of the Republic as well as the Defence Policy attribute the exclusive function of the Armed Forces to guaranteeing the military component…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The interests and business of defence institutions associated with the exploitation of natural resources, particularly in Northern Mozambique, where mineral resources and liquefied natural…
Explore
19 50/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 50 / 100
The 1st and 2nd National Survey on Governance and Corruption in the public and private sector carried out on a national scale, in all…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
The government is aware of the possibility of organised crime in the defence and security sector and is in a position to take action…
Explore
20 50/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 25 / 100
The General Inspectorate of Defence is a body of the Ministry of National Defence responsible for supervising and controlling the correct administration of human,…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The independence of the General Inspectorate of Defence is established in formal terms, but the appointment of the Inspector General depends on the Minister…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Inspectorate-General of Defence is legally independent and autonomous [1]. However, in practice, it is politically influenced, as the Minister of National Defence appoints…
Explore
21 13/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Parliamentary Committee on Defence, Security and Public Order has specific competence over the State’s Intelligence and Security Policies (SISE) [1]. This includes reviewing…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The parliamentary oversight function has little or no influence over the Intelligence Services, because the legislation on Protection of State Secrets and Right to…
Explore
22 33/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 50 / 100
In Mozambique, Intelligence Sector issues are competitive and protected by the State Secrets Law [1]. The Intelligence Policy is not public, and the recruitment…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
Traditionally, senior positions in the Intelligence Services depend more on the trust of the executive than on the technical competence and knowledge of the…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
The recruitment and appointment follow the Verification element, but the process does not require a public competition and observes the principles of confidentiality of…
Explore
23 50/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
On 3 June 2013, Mozambique signed the ATT Treaty [1]; on 14 December 2018, it deposited the Treaty [1]; and by Resolution No. 11/2018…
Explore
Compliance Score: 0 / 100
Since the ratification of the ATT in 2018, Mozambique has not yet submitted an Annual Report [1]. Between 2013 and 2019, Mozambique experienced political-military…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Mozambique is not a weapons producer yet, but Article 8 of the regulation on defence products, approved by Decree No. 34/2007 of 10 August,…
Explore
76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Despite lobbying activity and some prominent corruption cases involving lobbyists, the country has no framework for regulating lobbying. There is only the Public Probity…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
The public officials in defence institutions are not required to publish records of lobbying meetings or to disclose any identified conflicts of interest risks.…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
The public officials in defence institutions are not required to publish records of lobbying meetings or to disclose any identified conflicts of interest risks.…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no oversight or enforcement of lobbying legislation. The institution that could deal with lobbying supervision would be Parliament and the Attorney General’s…
Explore

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Expand
Q1 NA/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Q2 NA/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Q3 NA/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Q4 NA/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Q5 NA/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Q6 NA/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Q7 NA/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Q8 NA/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Q9 NA/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Q10 NA/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 NA/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Q12 NA/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Q13 NA/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Q14 NA/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Q15 NA/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Q16 NA/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Q17 NA/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 NA/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 NA/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Q20 NA/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 NA/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Q22 NA/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 NA/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 NA/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question